creedo299
Epochal Historian
Linearity post, history differences between 1500s and 2000s:
To time travelers only visiting this year 2000 era realm.
Please note the following on both vampire and werewolf topologies.
There is ample evidence that in the 15, 16, 17 and 18oos, that there were both vampire and werewolf plagues, in central Europe.
These were invested plagues, which some in part had come from India, as retribution for past deeds of others.
There was also naturally occurring vampire clans, such as said in Germany, which were famous said completive clans.*Vampires have their own kind of economy and sociology and they more or less stick to themselves, unless they must deal with man.
Other than this, real vampires have very little to do with mankind.
The two sources that I point to over what is given in the year 2004, as supposed to have been factual, the movie Van Helsing, follows accordingly.
That one, in Bullfinch's book occult and mythological creatures, there is an engraving to print, from the rough 1600s showing an entire town razed by an army of werewolves.
The only survivor of this encounter, told his story by escaping to a tree, at which he heard two werewolves converse, after they ran to the base of said tree.
*These werewolves looked similar to large black wolves, however could both talk and stand errect on their hind legs, at will.
The second was offered in a simple red colored book on vampires, which told of people who were dug up two to three weeks after being interred, being found to be awake, however immobile in the daylight, with their mouths gorged with blood.
There is evidence in the contacts I have made, that vampires began to socialize with mankind, in the probable 30s 40s on to the 2000s.Titled Vampires.
This would mean that as I have been told, that vampires may have made use of laboratories, to genetically alter their young, so that they could blend in with then human crowd, for sub genetic variants of vampires, surviving on into the future?
This is also indicated by two or three late to 2000s film jonra, showing variants on the old standard stereotypical vampire, whop is said to inhabit the night, replacing these stereotypes, with modern looking wimen, in fashionable dresses.
It may be that the new stereotypes, such as Van Helsing, are very nonaccurate and meant for entertainment purposes only?Van Helsing link http://movies.yahoo.com/movies/feature/vanhelsing.html
There is also the serious question raised, are some vampire attacks, which may have been recent, being blamed on the vampires, when the real culprit this era, may have been the said underground alien network.
This network has been known to manufacture both new types of scare creatures, as well as beings, that classically could have passed for vampires.
If you are visiting this time and have seen the movie Van Helsing, then realize that what is shown within this movie, may not be an accurate portrayal of factual information?
It is said even in American, that there are active clans of vampires, however it is their wish for their own economic reasons, to stay well hidden and not receive real publicity, as to their particulars.
To time travelers only visiting this year 2000 era realm.
Please note the following on both vampire and werewolf topologies.
There is ample evidence that in the 15, 16, 17 and 18oos, that there were both vampire and werewolf plagues, in central Europe.
These were invested plagues, which some in part had come from India, as retribution for past deeds of others.
There was also naturally occurring vampire clans, such as said in Germany, which were famous said completive clans.*Vampires have their own kind of economy and sociology and they more or less stick to themselves, unless they must deal with man.
Other than this, real vampires have very little to do with mankind.
The two sources that I point to over what is given in the year 2004, as supposed to have been factual, the movie Van Helsing, follows accordingly.
That one, in Bullfinch's book occult and mythological creatures, there is an engraving to print, from the rough 1600s showing an entire town razed by an army of werewolves.
The only survivor of this encounter, told his story by escaping to a tree, at which he heard two werewolves converse, after they ran to the base of said tree.
*These werewolves looked similar to large black wolves, however could both talk and stand errect on their hind legs, at will.
The second was offered in a simple red colored book on vampires, which told of people who were dug up two to three weeks after being interred, being found to be awake, however immobile in the daylight, with their mouths gorged with blood.
There is evidence in the contacts I have made, that vampires began to socialize with mankind, in the probable 30s 40s on to the 2000s.Titled Vampires.
This would mean that as I have been told, that vampires may have made use of laboratories, to genetically alter their young, so that they could blend in with then human crowd, for sub genetic variants of vampires, surviving on into the future?
This is also indicated by two or three late to 2000s film jonra, showing variants on the old standard stereotypical vampire, whop is said to inhabit the night, replacing these stereotypes, with modern looking wimen, in fashionable dresses.
It may be that the new stereotypes, such as Van Helsing, are very nonaccurate and meant for entertainment purposes only?Van Helsing link http://movies.yahoo.com/movies/feature/vanhelsing.html
There is also the serious question raised, are some vampire attacks, which may have been recent, being blamed on the vampires, when the real culprit this era, may have been the said underground alien network.
This network has been known to manufacture both new types of scare creatures, as well as beings, that classically could have passed for vampires.
If you are visiting this time and have seen the movie Van Helsing, then realize that what is shown within this movie, may not be an accurate portrayal of factual information?
It is said even in American, that there are active clans of vampires, however it is their wish for their own economic reasons, to stay well hidden and not receive real publicity, as to their particulars.
