Skepti,
Yes. Here's the rest of the context so you can see what I was refering to:
Razimus contacted me about this a day or so after he posted messages on three sites asking for people to give him Pamela's email address because the address he had was no longer valid. His attempts to solicit the email address from people without Pamela's permission was not well received on those sites. He took a lot of flack over the attempt. Remember, Razimus is someone that we've dealt with for years. He's not a bad guy but he is someone who has been a bit over-the-top regarding Titor. No one was willing to give up that private information to him.
I won't post the entire email but in closing it here's what I advised him:
As you go about this please keep some perspective: the story is almost ten years old. No one really cares about it any more except for the flurry of interest in Italy following last year's Voyager episode about Titor on RIA network. If you post asking for someone to have Pamela contact you make sure that your post doesn't sound like "yet another Titor researcher". No ALL CAPS, no text set off by *ASTERISK*, excessive bold text, red text - nothing that is indicative of someone who is consumed by the story. Let's be frank – don't do anything that makes it look like you're a Titor nutcase hell bent on solving the Titor Conspiracy. Pamela simply will no longer respond to emails that even look like that's the case. She (and I) has had hundreds of fruitbat email contacts who really troubled her with their irratic ideas. OK?
Remember that this is now and always has been Internet entertainment – nothing more. It's not a huge conspiratorial hoax, it's not National Security, it is not imperative that anyone ever solves the mystery and it's not something that should, in our desire to solve the mystery, cause us to announce online "suspect" Titor's personal information like real names, address', phone numbers, etc.
So, even before the report was made public I'd warned him about using the real names of real people in Titor "suspect" lists. I didn't do that at random. It was specific to him. I know how much this has consumed him, at least online, over the years and I know how he has had a tendncy to get outside the envelope in the past.
As to your quote above, here's more of the context of my response taken from anothr email to him:
One last time: Perspective. Titor is a game. Fingering over a dozen real people and a couple of real businesses by use of the terms “suspect†while suggesting fraud isn’t a game. You’ve already had one person respond to your Anomalies portion of the expose who appears to have interpreted your information as an accusation of some sort of possible Internet financial fraud. That’s not a good sign. Coupled with your statements about the owner, Olav Philips, as being the #1 suspect, Anomalies being involved in assisting people with such hoaxes and all the obvious factual errors in the report and…do you see where I’m going with this? I’m not suggesting that Olav would sue you. What I’m saying is that if you look at just one of the people that you fingered you’ve left yourself wide open to civil liability. Now multiply that by the 110 names – 15 of which we absolutely know not to be sock-puppets, suspects of anything and who haven’t had any involvement with the Titor Saga for almost a decade and the involvement that they did have was minimal at best...[snip]
The report had come out and I had correctly guessed how Razimus would approach it - once again he was over-the-top.
I posted some comments on Anomalies after I posted the above quoted text there. Here are my additional comments:
As I said you fingered over a hundred people and if just one takes offense to the accusation...
And so far not one, but two very real people not included above have seen their names on your Titor sock-puppet list and have had to take the time to respond - Beaux from ATS and Jeanette on youTube. That's at least 17 people's names that you put out there that were incorrect.
You and I both know that what I wrote to you was in no way a threat. It was simple advice with a request to put this thing into some sort of common sense perspective. I still don't know what you believe your end-game is, what you hope to acomplish or if you've really considered the privacy issues involved with shotgunning over a hundred names into the public arena with no evidence to support the accusation that they were puppet accounts for Titor.
Anomalies Post
Raz knows that I wasn't threatening him. I was trying to give him some perspective on what it was that he was actually doing when he tossed out over 100 names of posters. most of whom appeared to have been using their real names. and accused them of being Titor sock-puppet accounts...simply because they only posted a few times and never posted about Titor again.
When I first received the report from Raz via email I immediately recognized 15 of the names on his "puppet" list as people that I have had personal contact with at one time or another. I told him that they were not Titor alter-egos/sock-puppets. I told him that not everyone will have a sense of humor, ten years after the fact, when they see their real name associated with a report that calls them "suspects" in a context that implies that they were involved in some sort of fraud. And within 48 hours of that message to Raz two people - people that were not in my list of 15 - recognized their names and replied to him (Jeanette and Beaux).
Olav Phillips, the owner of Anomalies.net, was listed as Suspect #1. One might not agree that Raz accused him of a crime - yet on this site at least one poster, Doghead, has posted his interpretation of the report as possibly being an accusation of a crime by Phillips.
Re: JOHN TITOR A.K.A. RAZIMUS REPORT [re: Razimus]
02/13/09 09:13 PM (203.129.33.114) Edit Reply
Financially motivated fraud, eh?
Motive?
Means?
Opportunity?
Signature?
Identity?
If it is proven to be an Anomalies.net operation as you allege, then it is potentially arguable that they committed fraud to obtain an economic benefit- increased traffic, therefore increased ad revenue etc.
I will try and find a historical snapshot of their front page to see if an appropriate legal disclaimer was there. The usual one disclaims responsibility for the content of posts, but the legal clause in this case would need to be broader for them not to fall foul of Federal online and broadcasting laws. Not that they are enforced consistently...
Doghead's Post
Olav was not in a humorous mood upon reading the report, viewing the videos and seeing Doghead's post given the above context that involves his very real name and the name of his website being associated with an accusation of "financially motivated fraud".
And we've only heard from three people whose names are still hanging out there. There are another dozen names on the list that I'm fairly confident that I had contact with via PM or email in 2003-2004 after the JTFan media blitz promoting The Book for the JTF. It's been my practice to save all Titor related emails but they are spread out over several HDD's. I just haven't been too motivated to dig through them to see just who on the list has contacted me. It's enough for me to know that a significant number of real names are incorrectly on the list of Titor puppets.
Now, that's the context in which I was communicating with Razimus. Not a threat but advice and a call to step back and look at what he was engaged in with some sense of calm and a clear head.
And here's the problem, other than the privacy issue, with his conclusions regarding the names of people who only posted a couple of times on the Post 2 Post "I am from 2036" thread:
You can't put the Titor Saga as it was in Jan-Mar 2001 on that site into the context of 2009, which is what he did. In 2001 on Art Bell's site we had about 5,000 members. A little over 100 of them postd at least one time on the Titor thread. In other words, only 2% of the members even bothered to post at all on the thread. The BBS was very active on a broad base of topics and Titor was just one of those topics. People dropped in to post, weren't interested enough to continue, and moved on to another topic.
And there's the false premise. Razimus concluded that those people had to be sock-puppet accounts because they never posted to the Titor thread again. He does so without knowing whether they "never posted again" or simply moved on to another topic on the general P2P forum.