I'm back

Re: I\'m back

You know about Homer!?!?!!?!!???! how, he dosent recover the russian documents for another 9 years in your time! WOW! im really impressed... /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Re: I\'m back

why are you mad? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Re: I\'m back

I told you guys it wasn't me. But I had more weird coincidences about "attacks from Mars" today. But since I'm not Titor, I don't suppose anyone cares now. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/devil.gif

Creedo times out, system use demands.

Massive SpaceTime NeuroPop. You are simply too, two, to much, Creedo.

.FCD.

.END.
RainmanTime
 
Re: I\'m back

I can give out info now because the military from my time is not watching me now. Adelphia cable??? is this what its called now, i thought all connections were satallite connections, cable i thought died out in 2002, thats what my dad said. i guess he was wrong. I dont suppose any of you guys know that i have changed my location- i am now in a small town in pennsylvania, because i wanted to see how the past north was.
 
Re: I\'m back

So... since you're free to give out info now... please, be my guest. Any information whatsoever from the future will suffice. Let us remain in awe.

/ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif
 
Re: I\'m back

Hi John,

What a shame you can't provide us with any photos or any other form of verification. Guess we'll just have to take your word for it. After all, why would you lie?

Anyway - hope you can fill in a few details for us all.

1. So what is the deal with the John Titor Foundation?? Is it an LLC or an INC? And what's their story?

2. How have you managed to find this worldline? What's our current divergence from your time?

3. Do you have any comments on the multitude of Time Travel hoaxers appearing on internet forums these days?

4. How is Europe in the future. You didn't really comment on it last time. And why did Russia attack us?

Well, I don't want to hog your attention. Those couple of questions should suffice. Oh, by the way, I'm sure you have a completely valid reason for not contacting her, but I'm sure Pam would love to hear from you.

James
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

*Note, any more harassment in these threads Rainman, I will go to the MOP?

Rules rules contact under robotic moderators duality clause>

To John Titor; I would like to know, there is a similarity of the case that was used for the C204 and a U.S. Navy Divers transducer.

Another board moderator, said that this unit was possibly a radar or microwave test load calibrator?

I would like this statement verified by you, please, (The main Tripler cylinders, are highly complex and machined apparatuses, which run on a cryo-field, which generate a Kerr-like at-length pulsed field, which materize4s some eight feet from then said time travel unit.

Question 2...I would like if you could also verify this additional statement?

The internal working of the said time displacement unit, either has, or does not have miniature computerized electronics boards, placed within it, to balance all functions, of needed projection of the Kerr field.

Statement;In this base receiving you information, what is thought about the said C204 and the time traveler using it, is that the need for the IBM large frame computer to take back to the future to program what has been said lost and the inner working of the C204 time machine, don't not concur in principle with each other.

In otherwords, if said John Titor can come from the future and needs a large IBM computer to program others, but the set-up of the C204, requires a mini-computerized board internally, then why was there a need to come to this time period to begin with; this is there are still computers within the future?

I understand that not all boards can carry code and that the IBM was code interchangeable.

Thank you Time Traveler, under Gray's robot moderators.
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

Note a said junior colleague, had used a hand held time displacement unit.

This unit found openings in space and time, that the user, could open and step into.

Did the user of this type of unit, utilize a laser point projector, which was connected to the main unit, which would activate the temporal entry unit, when feedback for that laser had shown a difference in light pressure register back to the hand held time displace unit?

Please and thank you, under time travel rules
 
Re: I\'m back

4. How is Europe in the future. You didn't really comment on it last time. And why did Russia attack us?

Yes, please do tell us. I think even with these so called low yield nukes, Holland would still be wiped out from the European map. :eek:
 
Re: I\'m back

I have no idea or intrest in any of the sites, foundations, stories, rumors, ect, ect about me. So im sorry, i cant help with that one.

As i said last time, there really isnt a huge difference. i am only 3 some years ahead, not 500. its basically the same.

If hoaxers are that low-down and bored, let them do what they please.

Although, i havent been to europe for about 20 years, i think its still in the process of rebuilding. the only major part of europe thats not doing much is england, which still has its very old buildings and stuff, wich im proud to say that none of them were hurt. Russia attacked us because there was an argument over who was superier. usa said they are much stronger, yet the russians had a much lager army. in a way, it was something very kiddish like, "my countrys better than yours!"
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

No, there is not a similarity of the case that was used for the C204 and a U.S. Navy Divers transduce

verification- yes

verification- no, there is only one computer insde the device, thats just to regulate heat and stuff, the entire time your traveling, your asleep.
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

no, there was no laser, if im mistaken im sorry. once your in the device, there are programmers and scientists that program you into the time, and i dont know what happens after that, i just wake up in 2004.
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

Been reading this board for a fair few months now after I was introduced to the story of john titor about a year ago.

Can't help but pick a few holes in your story :

1. Your sentance structure and use of vocabulary is nothing like that of the original posts.

2. You say your president was impeached for a trillion doller debt. Currently the US are just over 4 trillion in debt and rising. Unlike their last instance of economic trouble (where the interest of the debt was pushed back into the american market) they are relaying on foreign money (mostly from asia) which carrys with it 100's of billions of dollers in interest. You also say a public time machine is 2 billion dollers and then go on to say that it's not much money which in essence will make a trillion not much either.

If you really are from the future can you tell us how this was resloved? It wasn't mentioned in the posts from 2000/2001 and you've not mentioned it now, I think the rising possibility of a global economic crash would be an important event in history?

3. You say your processors in 2039 are 7ghz. Yet Moore's Law states speeds will double every 18 months (as it has done for the past 40 years). Although there is a limet to the height silicon can be, there's currently a lot of research going on towards tissue based computers. Where carbon is used to create single cells capable of transmiting a on/off signal in a collective. I imagine we'll have 7ghz pc's withen the next 2 years.

In the 2000/2001 posts it says that processor speeds are also measured in varibles not ghz anymore and he also seemed quite knowledgeable in terms of technology, can you explain the path of progresion for the processor.

edit : 1 or 2 typo's : found a good article www.csmonitor.com/2003/1201/p16s01-coop.html
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

Note, any more harassment in these threads Rainman, I will go to the MOP?

Awww...kicked to the curb like an old Coke can. As soon as the "real" John Titor shows up, I am of no worth anymore.

(sniff). Gosh, I was kinda enjoying the thought that maybe I was Titor. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Question to John Titor (AKA BOOMER): Why does it appear your usage of grammar has changed since you were here last? Maybe time travel is having a degrading effect to your synaptic responses? I'm not sure you would have referred to buildings (in England) as not being "hurt" in your last visit here. But obviously, there's something much more deep about time travel that I haven't quite "got" yet.

And as long as you're answering questions, can you get the suspense over right now and tell us if Bush or Kerry is going to win? That will tell me how much ammunition I'm going to have to stock-up on.

Kind Regards,
RainmanTime
 
Re: I\'m back\\To said time travler>

i am "John Titor", if you want my real name, you could break some futuristic codes and-
Well that's just super-duper. I'll remember that for when I need it. But that is not an answer to the pressing questions I asked, now is it? You offered to answer some questions, so I am taking you up on your generous offer.

Add another one to it: Is there ever a cure developed for sarcasm? If so, can you bring a few tabs back with you on your next trip? I feel an attack coming on.


Kind Regards,
RainmanTime
 
Back
Top