I'm back from visiting the future and . . .

Re: un-proveable? Wait and see.

I don't think so Creedo299 so time cop don't care about you taking picture of it..so what is your informtion about this proof?? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Re: some answers

Do we colonize the moon due to overpopulation?
a new era looms for old age

If so, do we then dig too deep and send the moon crashing to earth? Do you travel through this time period and go some 100,000 years into the future and meet 2 distinct races, one above ground and one below? If so, I hope you didn't go out at night..
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

I have some questions for you, Professor.

1. You traveled 100 years into the future, how long did you stay in the future ?
2. The information you are posting was from what source ?
3. You claim Raul has banned you from posting your video on this site ?
4. Did you return the machine back to whom you stole it from?
5. Exactly where did you end up in the future, or a general idea of the location?
6. How much distance did you travel whilst in the future ?
....A. By walking, i.e., 5 miles, 2 miles, what ?
....B. By vehicle ?
....C. Didnt travel anywhere, but remained in one spot?
7. What time was it when you arrived, not a specific time, but during morning, afternoon or night?
8. Where did you transport yourself to the future from, your living room, or did you go to an empty field somewhere?

I have more questions, but these few will suffice for now.
 
Re: un-proveable? Wait and see.

Let's see here.
I claimed:
Click to expand...
My point about falsifiability still stands. Your claim of time travel remains unfalsifiable with general predictions that have little, if any specifics. For example, Newton's F=ma is a specific prediction. No wiggle room there. If you can measure an acceleration of a known mass that is not proportional to the exerted force, then it is falsified. The wide gaps in specificity in your predictions leaves plenty of room for you to squirm ("clarify") when/if they don't come to pass. All I am waiting for now is your "iron-clad" falsification deflector of "well, I could have changed your worldline." /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Wait until November 4th 2008 for the election results.
That will prove if I am right or wrong. Either the President is a man or a woman and either a Democrat or a Republican.
Click to expand...
Or neither a Repub nor a Dem. Did you see Greenspan talking about a 3rd party candidate? Another poster here has predicted this very thing for 2008. Are you then saying that prediction is wrong? And why no name? Are you also going to claim the place you read this did NOT say "President So-and-so", but instead vaguely referred only to his male gender and Democratic partisanship?
I dont know the book and the movie. I just read the brief item online.
Click to expand...
And so you are telling me that the brief outline just said "it won an oscar" and did not say in what category it won the oscar? This is even more humorous to think that a news article said "some movie about senior citizens, based on some book, won an oscar." Wow, journalistic standards must really take a nosedive in the near future! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Look, a lot of what I claim will easily be proven one way or the other. Wait and see.
Click to expand...
And what guarantee do we have that you will still be around here (or even if "here" will still be here) so we can roast you if any particular prediction does NOT come to pass as you say? We will, of course, want your take on things if they do not happen as you suggest. In fact, there is a lot that could go wrong....go wrong....go wrong....with your predictions.

And finally it seems you have NO predictions with a solid "in the next 2-5 months" timeframe...hedging on all of them, it would seem. Awfully suspicious.
RMT
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

An attack will occur in France in the next few months past March 2006 (Or was it 2007?). Oops, I forgot to note the city.
Click to expand...

Events resulting in violence or death against humanity should not be revealed if a Time Traveller is visiting the past FROM the future. However, since you are FROM the present and you visited the future you can make a difference. You could've been more adamant at remebering specifics as you were in the following claim...
Being the smart cookie, I searched the history archives for news events of 2006 through 2008. It is rather like this web site ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighties ).
I just merely recorded some the items that I read.
Click to expand...
Was this significant event noted in "Wikipedia"? And if it was wouldn't you want to be involved in a present day attempt to foil a future attack, especially at this point in time so soon after 9/11? You could've recorded the specifics, being the smart cookie you are.

If your claims are true, then I challenge you to take this future knowledge you have been blessed with and attempt to make a difference and save lives instead of posting here to gain credibility.
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

The only thing I'll say about this is:

You claim to have gone 100 years forward...so 2107 and your predictions pertain to our near future...2007-ish

That's like me finding out facts about 1906 today. I don't think I could find the sorts of facts you are sharing very easily. Even if I went to a library to find them.

Why would you go so far forward only to look so far back again?
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

I know Inglegood area, I worked there on Imperial Hwy. some time ago and it is not what you are telling us, well not like Compton, correct me Mr.Rainman from LA X if Im wrong, and something else, why someone will take a time travel machine there...if is nothing in that city like electronic engeniering reaserch buildings or secret goverment buildings, etc. more than that, theres only a few buildings in that city, most residential. Sorry about my english, its geting worst since I live in Baja.


remember, you are the one that make this story, you are the one have to prove it. I dont doubt, I dont belive you.
 
Re: some answers

Here are some answers to questions I was asked -- or rather will be asked.
Click to expand...
So herein you have actually provided opportunities for someone... like me... to directly prove you wrong. Watch.

Question to Prof Faustus, the Time Traveler:
What will be the Mega Millions numbers, including the Mega number, for Tuesday, 21 March 2006?
Faustus Alleged Answer:
• 17, 43, 6, 33, 38, 28, and 12

There you go. We don't have all that long to wait for this one folks! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
RMT
 
Re: some answers

Come on folks. Mark is just having some fun pulling your leg, poking fun at time travel stories and having a good laugh.

Go back and look again at his predictions - they are the cliche of cliches of all time travel stories.

I think that he might be getting a better laugh than he anticipated because some folks are taking him somewhat seriously.
 
Re: no videos then?

Well, I guess sharing the video recording I have is not an option. Sorry, guys. The moderator prevents me from sharing the video of my time travel trip.
Click to expand...

"""I do not recall having a conversation with anyone about posting video on the TTI forums. You're welcome to tell everyone on the forums this. If the video exists, let him show it to us. I would be interested to see it. Raul"""

Well, there you have it. Post a link to your video, we ALL want to see it. Just post it on your website that you have listed in your bio, and post the link for us, including the Moderator, to follow.

If you cant follow through with this, then consider this post the final chapter of your claim.

.............................................. The End .....................................
 
Back
Top