I'm back from visiting the future and . . .

ProfessorFaustus

Chrono Cadet
I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

To demonstrate my access to time travel and intelligence on future happenings, I present my findings on my visit to the future.

I stole a time machine I came across while in Inglewood. Apparently the guy, some historical social-cultural anthropologist had no idea how un-safe and unsecure Inglewood, LA can be.

So I stole his tim machine when he was not looking and took a quick trip to the future.
I decided to be conservative and just voyaged 100 years into the future to see some things.

Here are some observations on the near future:
1. The next US president will not be a woman. He will be a Democrat though. (Sorry, Republicans but you almost had it. Next time, put Condi Rice instead of McCain.)
2. A terrorist attack will occur in France in the next few months past March 2006 (Or was it 2007?). Oops, I forgot to note the city. (Why they attack France, I have no idea. Perhaps, Arab terrorist hate the French like everyone else does.)
3. Next year's oscar-winning picture is based upon a book about some senior citizens re-discovering their love for each other.
4. New evidence about who the Zodiac killer was comes to light. Evidence suggests it was a homosexual mathematician grad student from Stanford.
5. A current (as of 2005-6) celebrity will die in a stupid mishaps. (He was too young and cute to die so tragically foul.)
6. Research from John Hopkins and from HArvard Medical School suggest a current genome mapping give clues to an approach to fighting cancer.
7. Avoid India in August 2006.
8. President Bush visits China in late Spring 2008.
9. Brittany divorces.
10. Rumours abound that Michael Jackson, the pop star, cloned himself. More sources than the National Enquirer report this.
11. A major radio host announces his (hint, hint) that he is/was diagnosis(ed) with cancer. (I think that happens this year or maybe next.)

Sorry, I am not a sports fan so I did not pay attention to US sporting events. And I travelled before the basketball thing was announced.
I can tell you that Germany and Brazil end up in this year's World Cup Final, again. Damn, I was hoping to see Germany vs. England. Italy is third.
This time, the USA did/does not make it as far.



There you are.
If you doubt me, then prove me wrong.
If you have questions, then ask.
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

To demonstrate my access to time travel and intelligence on future happenings, I present my findings on my visit to the future.

I stole a time machine I came across while in Inglewood. Apparently the guy, some historical social-cultural anthropologist had no idea how un-safe and unsecure Inglewood, LA can be.

So I stole his tim machine when he was not looking and took a quick trip to the future.
I decided to be conservative and just voyaged 100 years into the future to see some things.

Here are some observations on the near future:
1. The next US president will not be a woman. He will be a Democrat though. (Sorry, Republicans but you almost had it. Next time, put Condi Rice instead of McCain.)
2. A terrorist attack will occur in France in the next few months past March 2006 (Or was it 2007?). Oops, I forgot to note the city. (Why they attack France, I have no idea. Perhaps, Arab terrorist hate the French like everyone else does.)
3. Next year's oscar-winning picture is based upon a book about some senior citizens re-discovering their love for each other.
4. New evidence about who the Zodiac killer was comes to light. Evidence suggests it was a homosexual mathematician grad student from Stanford.
5. A current (as of 2005-6) celebrity will die in a stupid mishaps. (He was too young and cute to die so tragically foul.)
6. Research from John Hopkins and from HArvard Medical School suggest a current genome mapping give clues to an approach to fighting cancer.
7. Avoid India in August 2006.
8. President Bush visits China in late Spring 2008.
9. Brittany divorces.
10. Rumours abound that Michael Jackson, the pop star, cloned himself. More sources than the National Enquirer report this.
11. A major radio host announces his (hint, hint) that he is/was diagnosis(ed) with cancer. (I think that happens this year or maybe next.)

Sorry, I am not a sports fan so I did not pay attention to US sporting events. And I travelled before the basketball thing was announced.
I can tell you that Germany and Brazil end up in this year's World Cup Final, again. Damn, I was hoping to see Germany vs. England. Italy is third.
This time, the USA did/does not make it as far.



There you are.
If you doubt me, then prove me wrong.
If you have questions, then ask.



welll I guess that you have sin!!! you shall not steal........but I think that you are making this story up...hahah sound to good to be true...where is the picture of the time travel machine?? write back. :oops:
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

I wonder if I might ask the good Doctor to hold discussions about claims of time travel in the "time travel claims" forum? Long ago, we did ask Mop to set up such a forum just for this purpose. It would be kind if you could repost this over there and continue it in that area.

Muchas Gracias,
RMT
 
future artifacts

To when I travelled, paper newspapers are a thing of the past.

Everything is in electronic version.

I was about to attempt to steal some stuff from the future but I could not risk it.
I was afraid that I would have been unsuccessful.
The thief of the time machine was easy. My terrority, somewhat, the absentminided professor on a field study trip, and I was just lucky enough to happen to be at the right place at the right time to witness his arrival and his sorry attempt to hide the machine.

Truth be told, it took me a week to figure out how to read the controls and a day or two to actually pilot the machine to anytime.

I did manage to video record parts of my trip, just in case something had happened to me.
If I can just figure out how to up load 698 MB of video somewhere on the Internet, then I could share the video, otherwise come visit me here in LA.
 
Re: Sure, but first . . .

I'll do the same but I was waiting for you to post the same admonishment to Zeshua.
I thought I did? I certainly made at least one smartass comment to him to at least point this out, I believe. I could be wrong so I will go check. In any event, I agree that Zeshua's claims don't belong here either.

RMT
 
doubts?

"welll I guess that you have sin!!! you shall not steal...
Like you never took anything from the office at work. Paper clips count also. Besides, I have done bigger sins, I think, at least according to the Christian mythology.

but I think that you are making this story up...hahah sound to good to be true...
Now why is that?
Not enough about American revolutions? Did I fail to mention Civil War and secret societies activities?
Perhaps you wanted more threats about World War III or the coming Apocalypse.
Christ, you people. You must assume the future is all doom and gloom.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Future will be equally dull as the Present.
No World Wars. No American Civil Wars or Revolutions. No major civil un-rest. Heck, Los Angeles never suffers another (racial) riot, at least not through 2107 AD.

Then, again, I always challenge you.
If you doubt me, then prove me wrong.
 
Re: doubts?

In reply to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"welll I guess that you have sin!!! you shall not steal...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Like you never took anything from the office at work. Paper clips count also. Besides, I have done bigger sins, I think, at least according to the Christian mythology.


why did you sin??? did you know that sin you can't enter the kingdom of heaven if you sin one time....unless you know Jesus Christ?? to ask him for forgive your sin?? but I do have a question for you....you took the time machine from him....what if he was looking for his time machine because you stole it from him....and then he is stuck here in LA..then what if he have a family in the future?? now he don't have a way home back because you stole his machine...



Now why is that?
Not enough about American revolutions? Did I fail to mention Civil War and secret societies activities?
Perhaps you wanted more threats about World War III or the coming Apocalypse.
Christ, you people. You must assume the future is all doom and gloom.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Future will be equally dull as the Present.
No World Wars. No American Civil Wars or Revolutions. No major civil un-rest. Heck, Los Angeles never suffers another (racial) riot, at least not through 2107 AD.

Then, again, I always challenge you.
If you doubt me, then prove me wrong.


prove of the time travel machine the picture of the machine and then we all believe it but you don't have the proof of it then you are a fake...

John Titor did show his machine so why not YOU SHOW YOUR MACHINE OK?? ARE WE FAIR???


post the picture of the time machine of it on this board or other board...let see if you really did stole the time machine....!!!

:oops:
 
pictures or photoshop?

Pictures especially in today's age of technology are insufficient proof of my validity.

If you want proof, then just wait until what I say comes to past. You can wait a few months, can you not?

Besides, I can post all the photos and video I want because I can always fake them, just as a certain hoaxer did that some idiots still believe.

Just to demonstrate that I more of a genuine time traveller than that hoaxer, I offer verifiable facts that can easily be dis-proven with time.

But if you really, really want photos, then I send you something. Give me your email.
Of course, you should always be skeptical and perhaps assume I could have photoshoped them just as a certain hoaxer did.

:oops:
 
Re: doubts?

Prof. Faustus,

If you continue here then you shall be challenged in your statements, with accepted science.
If you doubt me, then prove me wrong.
Yes, that is the nice juicy bait that people who believe Titor took hook, line, and sinker. Burden of proof lies with the claimant. See Carl Sagan's famous quote about extraordinary claims...

But I do agree with your own statements to Warrior... WE do not need to prove you wrong, because TIME itself can take care of that job. Unfortunately, your predictions are just as unfalsifiable as Titor's, seeing as how you adopted his tactics of non-specificity. I especially like the sly way you addressed a terrorist attack in France. How convenient you cannot remember the city, and could not even pin down a date.

How about something highly specific...such as the predictions made by Informer in another thread that we will be tracking?

RMT
 
no videos then?

Well, I guess sharing the video recording I have is not an option.

Sorry, guys. The moderator prevents me from sharing the video of my time travel trip.
 
Re: I\'m back from visiting the future and . . .

(sigh) OK, so I guess I had better start the process. Darby, and others, please feel free to lend a hand.

Here are some observations on the near future:
1. The next US president will not be a woman. He will be a Democrat though. (Sorry, Republicans but you almost had it. Next time, put Condi Rice instead of McCain.)
Lovely. Not gonna give a name, huh? How non-specific of you!
2. A terrorist attack will occur in France in the next few months past March 2006 (Or was it 2007?). Oops, I forgot to note the city. (Why they attack France, I have no idea. Perhaps, Arab terrorist hate the French like everyone else does.)
Oh yes... I'd say you covered a HUGE swath of time with that one! So it could be anywhere in France, and any time from April 2006 thru who-knows-when in 2007.
3. Next year's oscar-winning picture is based upon a book about some senior citizens re-discovering their love for each other.
The obvious problem here is you don't name the book. The less obvious problem is that you do not even name which, specific, oscar it wins. Idiots would be dumb enough to assume it was best picture. But I am not an idiot.... at least not in that sense! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
4. New evidence about who the Zodiac killer was comes to light. Evidence suggests it was a homosexual mathematician grad student from Stanford.
No date, so open-ended. I'd even bet there were well more than one Stanford grad who would fit this vague profile.
5. A current (as of 2005-6) celebrity will die in a stupid mishaps. (He was too young and cute to die so tragically foul.)
Wow...as if that doesn't happen very often. Again, no name and no date. Could be anyone/anytime.
6. Research from John Hopkins and from HArvard Medical School suggest a current genome mapping give clues to an approach to fighting cancer.
Yawn. Do I really need to point out the same non-specifics?
7. Avoid India in August 2006.
I avoid it now, for many reasons. You give none.
8. President Bush visits China in late Spring 2008.
With the Olympics scheduled for Beijing, I don't think that is very hard to predict. Just don't take credit for it if him going during the SUMMER (after June 21st) does occur!
9. Brittany divorces.
I think Keven Federline can predict this one. No date, and no name of who she divorces. That dumb trailer trash could certainly divorce and marry plenty of times in the next few years. She's already done it once! Oh...that was annulled!
And BTW, you do not specify Brittany Spears, so one is left to assume again.
10. Rumours abound that Michael Jackson, the pop star, cloned himself. More sources than the National Enquirer report this.
Let me guess...Weekly World News picks up the story too! BTW, why didn't you pick up a National Enquirer from that time, seeing as how you claimed that newspapers were no longer used?
11. A major radio host announces his (hint, hint) that he is/was diagnosis(ed) with cancer. (I think that happens this year or maybe next.)
Names, please. You are really being silly here.

Are you willing to move this to the claims board now?
RMT
 
un-proveable? Wait and see.

Unfortunately, your predictions are just as unfalsifiable as Titor's, seeing as how you adopted his tactics of non-specificity.


Let's see here.
I claimed:
•The next US president will not be a woman. He will be a Democrat though.
Wait until November 4th 2008 for the election results.
That will prove if I am right or wrong. Either the President is a man or a woman and either a Democrat or a Republican.

I claimed:
• A terrorist attack will occur in France in the next few months past March 2006 (Or was it 2007?). Oops, I forgot to note the city.
I was not there and I got the information from another news item that referred back to the France episode. It is like saying "September 11th". No one here needs to footnote in every instance that it happened in New York. It is generally understood that "September 11th" is the event that happened in New York (even though Washington, D. C. deserves equal attention and respect.)

I claimed:
• Next year's oscar-winning picture is based upon a book about some senior citizens re-discovering their love for each other.
I dont know the book and the movie. I just read the brief item online.
Again, proof will happen with time. Wait and see.

I claimed:
•New evidence about who the Zodiac killer was comes to light. Evidence suggests it was a homosexual mathematician grad student from Stanford.
Again, I read that item in a summary of the news events. No date was given. But it will happen this year or next. That much I am certain.

I claimed:
•A current (as of 2005-6) celebrity will die in a stupid mishaps. (He was too young and cute to die so tragically foul.)
I cannot recall which year it was, but since it did not happen last year, then it must happen his year then. Problem solved.
Who is it? Hint: Bloom
How do they die? Think: of how Bono and Kennedy similarily died, but add a car like Princess Diana.

I claimed:
•Research from John Hopkins and from Harvard Medical School suggest a current genome mapping give clues to an approach to fighting cancer.
No date given. Could have been announced anytime in the next two years.
Wait and see. Or, follow up on what they are doing now. In order to be news in the future, they need to be doing the research today.

I claimed:
•Avoid India in August 2006.
I cannot be more specific without giving away the natural cause.
If that is not enough of a warning, then sorry.
By example, at this very instant, I cannot tell you the exxact date, if such a notion applies, of when Katrina happened. Likewise with the disaster in Indonesia last year. I can tell you about when it happened but not the exact date.

I claimed:
•President Bush visits China in late Spring 2008.
No dates were given. Just the months.

I claimed:
•Brittany divorces.
A piece of pop culture that was included and I noted for some who may be interested.

I claimed:
•Rumours abound that Michael Jackson, the pop star, cloned himself. More sources than the National Enquirer report this.
A piece of pop culture that was included and I noted for some who may be interested.

I claimed:
•A major radio host announces his (hint, hint) that he is/was diagnosis(ed) with cancer.
Here I am being deliberately vague. I do not want to disclose some one else's personal problem especially if they may not know themselves let alone letting the world know, which he will eventually do -- at his choosing, not mine.


I keep referring to this news source that I read somewhere or such. What is it, exactly?
Being the smart cookie, I searched the history archives for news events of 2006 through 2008. It is rather like this web site ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighties ).
I just merely recorded some the items that I read.


Look, a lot of what I claim will easily be proven one way or the other. Wait and see.
Come on, patience. I could not quickly find what was going to happen next week . . . perhaps.
 
Re: un-proveable? Wait and see.

If you time traveled and took photos, they would either be confiscated by what is known as a time cop, or have turned blank. Nice try.
 
some answers

Here are some answers to questions I was asked -- or rather will be asked.

• Texas

• Senator Shockley

• Clif Edelman

• Lake Victoria

• 29 August 2007

• Fair Weather

• Jerry Springer -- that I found hard to believe, but truth is stranger than fiction

• Eric Clapton

• New Zealand -- should have been the West Indies

• Michelle Wu -- you will have an esay shot; no competition if you act at the BBQ and not after the Holidays

• $22 million box office sales -- just breaks even, obviously he did a worse job than the lesser known actor

• 17, 43, 6, 33, 38, 28, and 12

• final score: 11 - 9

• another final score: 106 - 99

• pay attention to an Adian Craig, a Desiree Coffey, and a Kalion

• "Whip it up." -- always something, good question by the way

• 82 -- I'm not going to be any more specific, it is best for you to figure out the rest

• Walter, on 7 February 2007, try the other route instead, and look for the girl in the felt hat
 
Re: un-proveable? Wait and see.

If you time traveled and took photos, they would either be confiscated by what is known as a time cop, or have turned blank. Nice try.

but I don't think so Creedo299 because they have bigger thing than a time travler...so what is your proof of this idea??

you don't have a proof of this idea naw..............forget it.
:oops:
 
Back
Top