How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at home.

Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

Ruthless...I know that you are able to determine if anyone is being less-than honest with you.

This is a matter of trust.

That Reactor got angry, and made it so he couldn't sign in as Reactor, I did that same thing with OvLrdLegion. I put in random numbers as to not be able to sign in again, and cancelled my e-mail account.

Thus, when I got over my frustration's, I had to re-register as KerrTexas. When I did this, I let the Moderator know it was me, and what had happened. I also tried to tell as many people as I knew at the time, that I was once here as OvLrdLegion.

This isn't the issue that is on the table with what we are saying has happened. Reactor can get angry everyday and do this again and again, for all I care.

However, if someone post's as different people, you know, that this is a violation of the trust we have placed with the people we are having discussions with in the forum's.

If I have a discussion with you, and signed into the site as OvLrdLegion, and made off that I was two different people...I would think that you might feel somewhat betrayed and angry, yourself.

or...

If you thought you were having a discussion with me, and got insulted at times, and were dragged through the mud, so to speak, and discovered that sometimes you were addressing me, and sometimes you were addressing my wife, under the guise of just me, would this also chap your hide or what ?

Now imagine if I was doing both of these to you at once, are you indicating here that you would not feel any anger...at all ?

It would seem to me that I would have to either leave, or earn your trust back, and I don't believe you would do so if:

1. I never admitted to you what you know I did...

2. That I told you that my wife might still be speaking to you, and you wouldn't know when it was her or me.

Also, most discussion forum's ( excepting those that archive manuscripts and specific texts ), would never allow anyone to post the entire content's of any lengthy text into the threads.

That this was done to create problems should be clear to you, and any moderator would stop it, anywhere, not just here.

Why didn't Reactor post his survival book, or his "brother" post the religious book over on Time Chatter ?

Instead he posted that material here ? Where he claims he was having problems with the Moderator already ?

I know you are an intelligent man, so I think you can understand the dynamics of what is taking place here.
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

Lloyd, you continue down a very bad road here. I am not kidding.

Lloyd wrote:
Well his name is Floyd. And yes he was playing games I will agree but vengence is way too strong of a word. Inappropiate Im not sure about that. I have seen people make long post here before with strong opinions. There is no TTI policy that I know of for what Floyd was doing. The policy said the post can be deleted at any time that is all he new. And his post were of material that is commonly publicyly available at your local library and with no copyright. Nuff said.

Since you continue in your lie, then it is time to reveal the next in the damning evidence against Reactor, BuckRogers, Rainman2, Time_God, and God_Of_Time. As mentioned before, myself and KerrTexas have "telegraphed" (provided hints) about what is coming. And also as I mentioned above, it will result in tying Lloyd to yet another TTI account.

When some people type and make errors, some errors are common and others are not very common at all. Someone here on TTI makes a very common typing error of the following form:

don,t

Anyone who still believes Lloyd is NOT LYING in his story of he and his "brother" should probably want to do a text search on TTI for that exact text string above. The results of the search are interesting. There is no doubt that the poster who makes this error the most, by a HUGE margin, is Reactor1967. Look at how many times his username shows up on the results list of that search.

And then notice the following other user names that show up at the top of this results list who also make the exact same typing error:

God_Of_Time
Music_man
BuckRogers

This clearly shows that all of the above, along with Reactor1967, are the same people doing the typing. Lloyd is behind all of these user accounts. And notice the new one in the list of allegations? Music_man. No surprise there.

And oh yes...let's not forget that there is yet more evidence tying all four of these accounts to the same person. We have hinted at it, but I will save that for the next phase... if Lloyd insists on continuing.

Lloyd, would you like to tell people here on the forum what email address you used when you changed it on your reactor1967 account? You have not mentioned that little detail in your story about doing this...I wonder why you did not mention that. Are you afraid it could get you in trouble? BIG trouble?

You are at your next decision point, Lloyd. Once again I implore you to choose wisely. So far, you have not.
RMT
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

Not only does Lloyd make another very poor choice, but there is a great deal of irony in one sentence of his reply, as we shall see. Here is what Lloyd wrote, again up in the BAN thread:

Ray:

You mean your evidence against my brother. Which by the way he is drinking beer with me tonight and watching movies. As for the hole Im not in any hole even if you banned me. I will be just fine. I will be beside my brother drinking beer and watching movies. My activities around here for the most part have slowed down. I,ve been working on my code that you won,t let me post on this forum. I'm fine ray and I will stay fine.

Your rigid frame of thinking which I compare to heuristics is something you should understand. Forming a way of thinking to catch many acceptable situations but that does not accuratelly apply to all situations and there is no formal proof that your behavior is always correct even though and here is the kicker. "You believe it is."

But I am telling you that only you believe it and maybe your students or your followers believe. Your behavior that is. If mop used the TOS on all your post he would have to ban you. What would happen if I went around here threatening to bust people's chops. God forbid I should say that to a female here. Boy I would really get in trouble. Your lucky I don,t call the police where you live and make a report on that and press charges against you. I have up to one year I think. See you can do it here at TTI but other users can,t. You dug your own hole a long time ago but no one that has the power will step up to the plate and throw the dirt on your grave.

Frankly, I don,t see why I should stick around and reply to your so called evidence when you can break the rules but no one else cant. And, I did not break any rules. I don,t see why I should reply and get bullied.

Good day Ray.

First this statement from Lloyd:

You mean your evidence against my brother.

No, I mean the evidence against you, Lloyd. For we are now approaching the revelation of evidence about an action that you have even written about and admitted that you, yourself, took this action. You fully admitted it in one of your recent posts. You told everyone here that you changed your email address tied to your reactor1967 account. And that is the evidence that will soon (very soon) be exposed here for everyone to see. And you must remember: You made the choice to push it this far. It was through your choice that this evidence is revealed about your careless and potentially illegal action.

And now here is the irony in Lloyd's latest response:

Your lucky I don,t call the police where you live and make a report on that and press charges against you.

How lucky do you feel right now, Lloyd? Because while you claim that you should call the police on me, there is a different agency of the government that I may very well have to report you to. And it relates to that email address you used and changed in your reactor1967 account. You do remember whose email address you appropriated and used in your account, don't you Lloyd? I am sure you do.

How would you feel if agents of the US Federal Government were made aware of what email address you used? Given the email address you used, and the fact that it belongs to the US Federal Government, they are the agents that will be involved. Are you honestly ready to face this situation, Lloyd? It is extremely serious what you have done. But perhaps you do not think so. And why are you even refusing to talk about this email address? You were only too happy to tell us that you were messing around with the email address on your reactor account. Why all of a sudden do you not wish to talk about it any more?

To other TTI members reading this: If you have not guessed by now, Lloyd decided to fraudulently use the email address of someone in the US Federal Government. The charges for abusing or misappropriating the identity or email information of a US Federal Government employee could be very serious indeed. And you have seen how I have given Lloyd every opportunity to come clean or avoid this, and he just continues to act deceitfully.

Lloyd: Are you ready for Raul and agents of the US Federal Government to be informed about what you have done? The server records are all in the possession of Raul. All the evidence is here. Not only that, but when you changed that email in your account, the forum software automatically sends out a verification email to the address you entered. So that federal government email address you entered, it already has received an EMAIL from TTI, and it is associated with your username. So technically, the federal government already has evidence of what you have done.

The next reply you post, Lloyd, could result in some very unpleasant things happening in your life... all as a result of your own choices, your own careless games you play here. I know that right now, I am glad I am not you. And I feel sorry for you because of what you have done. But truly you have absolutely no one to blame but yourself.

RMT
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

Privacy Policy

User Information:

As you visit our site, <font color="red"> the Time Travel Institute does not collect any personal identifying information about you. Your name, address, phone number, and email address all remain your private properties. Our server does, however, note non-personally identifying details such as, but not limited to, the server you are logged onto, the geographic location of the ISP you use, the type of browser you use, and your IP address. This information is obtained solely for the purpose of enhancing the over-all experience of the website for visitors.[/COLOR]

<font color="blue"> No where do I read that the information can be used to threaten a member. [/COLOR]

Message Board Registration: There are instances where a user may provide specific personal information in a message to us or when registering for the message board. Information you enter on the registration form for the message board will be viewable to the public. You may, however, choose the option to not have your e-mail address be viewable to the public. This option is available at the time of registration or at any time by visiting the profile link at the message boards. We will not offer lists of e-mail addresses of our registered members to a third party. However, if you choose to have your e-mail public, there is a possibility of other Internet users contacting you.

Cookies: The message boards at the Time Travel Institute use cookies to store the following information: the last time you logged in, your username and password, and your preferred "topic view", if you set it in preferences. These cookies are stored on your browser. No cookies are used by the message board software program to track your movement or perform any other function other than enhance your use of the message board. You may delete all cookies set in this forum by visting the "preferences" area of the forum and selecting the "delete cookies" link.

Third-Party Advertising Services: The Time Travel Institute uses third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address or telephone number) about your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements on this site and other sites about goods and services that may be of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, please click here.

To find out more about the privacy policies of specific advertisers, click below:

Burst! Media

Fastclick

Third-Party Cookies: In the course of serving advertisements to this site, our third-party advertisers may place or recognize a unique "cookie" on your browser.


Advertisement



Advertising Survey
Help us improve this site. Click here to take our advertising survey.



The Time Travel Institute, although entirely fictional, still respects your privacy. View our privacy policy here.
This page has been accessed times.
Sci-Fi Site of the Week - June 1, 1999.
Contact us.

© 1997-2005 Time Travel Institute. All rights reserved.
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

If you have a problem with someone it should be done in private not used to give someone a "power trip." This whole situation is just plainly wrong. Anyone can see it and I will speak my mind.
With this type of behavior the web site is headed for a "dead zone". Dead zone as in reduced activity. If you feel the need to ban someone just ban them and they can take it up with MOP but I feel you are violating the web sites own privacy policies.


The Time Travel Institute, although entirely fictional, <font color="red"> still respects your privacy. [/COLOR]

[/quote]really? Doesn't seem like it.
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

Pamela,

As for "power trips" and doing this in public: Lloyd decided to block all incoming Private Messages. I had initially attempted to PM him when we realized he was abusing the rules with multiple accounts. So this was forced into the public forums by none other than Lloyd.

If you feel the need to ban someone just ban them and they can take it up with MOP

Done, per your request.

but I feel you are violating the web sites own privacy policies.

And how would you feel about someone breaking the law?

You should make sure you have all the facts before you take a side.
RMT
 
Re: How to build a homemade nuclear reactor at hom

I understand what you are saying, Pamela.

Still does not excuse Reactor from his behavior. You would have to admit, that regardless of Rainman's response, for Reactor to do what "he" did was indeed inappropraite, and "something" had to be done.

In Reactor's public record, as seen when "anyone" clicks into his bio page, was a link to a site that goes even further with subjects that could be very dangerous.

To then have the same individual, begin to post implied Islamic commentaries, militant guidebooks, including the Communist Manifesto, and a complete and un-abridged edition of the Qu'ran in it's entirety, well, I for one don't see the humor nor innocence in engaging in "that" kind of behaviour.

Hopefully, this is a done deal. I hope we "all" can take our lumps as we deserve them , leave this behind, and focus more "positive" energy into other topics.
 
Back
Top