Help from (a) John Titor.What would John Titor do?
- Thread starter ProfessorFaustus
- Start date
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
Re: Congradulations: You won
Re: SPR
According to the description, it is a usent message board about Relativity.
I am not interest in dicussing relativity.
That is the key mistake you made.
Try again, Darby.
In anticipation, let me answer the next obvious question: if not interested in "discussing" relativity, then why make (genera)] relativity a issue with discussing time travel?
Answer: Understanding General Relativity is a prerequisite for talking about the "scientific" and "technical" approach to time travel. I all-ready understand GR amd differential geometry, I do not need to discuss the background material with anyone.
There is a difference between talking about elementary algebra and talking about word problems that involve the use of algebra.
I want to discuss application(s). I assume anyone else who word drops such technical and scientific terms understands the theory all-ready. (That was my mistake.)
For example, I am not interested in discussing textbook lessons and reading tech journals on the background material, I am interested in latest research results that explore applications of textbook lessons. I all-ready know and have many resources upon which to read, hence the reference to links in a previous post.
(To date, there has not been any improvement upon the Tipler model. I am hoping Mallet's methoid may prove more accessible within my lifetime.)
Check, again, Darby.
Besides, I am a math grad student who does Logic, never go near any way shape or form in applied math, let alone physics. (Eek!)
Re: SPR
According to the description, it is a usent message board about Relativity.
I am not interest in dicussing relativity.
That is the key mistake you made.
Try again, Darby.
In anticipation, let me answer the next obvious question: if not interested in "discussing" relativity, then why make (genera)] relativity a issue with discussing time travel?
Answer: Understanding General Relativity is a prerequisite for talking about the "scientific" and "technical" approach to time travel. I all-ready understand GR amd differential geometry, I do not need to discuss the background material with anyone.
There is a difference between talking about elementary algebra and talking about word problems that involve the use of algebra.
I want to discuss application(s). I assume anyone else who word drops such technical and scientific terms understands the theory all-ready. (That was my mistake.)
For example, I am not interested in discussing textbook lessons and reading tech journals on the background material, I am interested in latest research results that explore applications of textbook lessons. I all-ready know and have many resources upon which to read, hence the reference to links in a previous post.
(To date, there has not been any improvement upon the Tipler model. I am hoping Mallet's methoid may prove more accessible within my lifetime.)
Check, again, Darby.
Besides, I am a math grad student who does Logic, never go near any way shape or form in applied math, let alone physics. (Eek!)
Good_Scientist
Temporal Navigator
Re: Congradulations: You won
Maths students that cant do physics, the USA universities are doing badly here!
Physics is easier to do if you are good at matsh than if you are good at physics.
GS
Maths students that cant do physics, the USA universities are doing badly here!
Physics is easier to do if you are good at matsh than if you are good at physics.
GS
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
Can do but choose not to do.
I did not write that I cannot do physics, I wrote that I do not study physics nor do I work in a field of mathematics that has any applications. Logic is the purest form of mathematics, unlike the pretenders e.g.Number Theory.
Why oh why do people insist on mis-reading what I never write?
Oh, Rand, say me from these irrational minds.
I did not write that I cannot do physics, I wrote that I do not study physics nor do I work in a field of mathematics that has any applications. Logic is the purest form of mathematics, unlike the pretenders e.g.Number Theory.
Why oh why do people insist on mis-reading what I never write?
Oh, Rand, say me from these irrational minds.
Good_Scientist
Temporal Navigator
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Well it is implied from this quote
So........ You cannot do physics, as was implied by your above statement.
Arithmetic is the purest form of mathematics. Logic is as philosophical as it is mathematical, and the PUREST form of logic (in Maths) is arithmetic.
GS
Well it is implied from this quote
So........ You cannot do physics, as was implied by your above statement.
Arithmetic is the purest form of mathematics. Logic is as philosophical as it is mathematical, and the PUREST form of logic (in Maths) is arithmetic.
GS
Scannell
Chrono Cadet
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
LOL, Professor F, or is it Javier? Not only do you use cloaker IP addresses, but at this point it’s reveal'n to be JAVIER because his canniness is forever blossoming into road apples.
The TTA wears many masks and we have detested, revealed and debunked them all!! He gave away his last drop of wisdom when he used the word "OUCH". You posted it here in this thread.
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=40512&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=40215&Search=true#Post40512
"Coincidently" Javier also recently used the word "OUCH".
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=39943&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=38696&Search=true#Post39943
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=40414&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=40200&Search=true#Post40414
LOL, games, games and more games, just to keep the Titor story live'n!!
LOL, Professor F, or is it Javier? Not only do you use cloaker IP addresses, but at this point it’s reveal'n to be JAVIER because his canniness is forever blossoming into road apples.
The TTA wears many masks and we have detested, revealed and debunked them all!! He gave away his last drop of wisdom when he used the word "OUCH". You posted it here in this thread.
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=40512&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=40215&Search=true#Post40512
"Coincidently" Javier also recently used the word "OUCH".
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=39943&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=38696&Search=true#Post39943
http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=40414&Forum=All_Forums&Words=Ouch&Match=Entire%20Phrase&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Old=allposts&Main=40200&Search=true#Post40414
LOL, games, games and more games, just to keep the Titor story live'n!!
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
not who you claim
I am bothering to reply because my ego cannot stand the most egreious error. I do not want some one else claiming credit for what I did. (Likewise, I do not want to be credited for what some one else has done.)
I am not this "Javier" fellow to which you refer.
I am who I always was and am.
If you do not believe me, then I have done the correction and I am absolved from supporting ignorance.
It is not like I am hiding from any one.
If yo ever bothered to read my posts, you will know who I am and how to reach.
I am very accessible unlike others who cloak themselves behind avatars and cute nicknames.
I am bothering to reply because my ego cannot stand the most egreious error. I do not want some one else claiming credit for what I did. (Likewise, I do not want to be credited for what some one else has done.)
I am not this "Javier" fellow to which you refer.
I am who I always was and am.
If you do not believe me, then I have done the correction and I am absolved from supporting ignorance.
It is not like I am hiding from any one.
If yo ever bothered to read my posts, you will know who I am and how to reach.
I am very accessible unlike others who cloak themselves behind avatars and cute nicknames.
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Although Logic as a sub-branch of Mathematics has philosophical underpinnings and roots, Logic, or somethings refer to as Foundations, is a branch of Mathematics investigating the strength of aximatic scheme that many mathematicians take for granted. An algebraist does not worry about the Axiom of Choice, they just use it or not in their proofs. A logician worrys about the Foundations Axiom aka Axiom of Choice.
Further note: there is a difference between "philosophical" logic e.g. Modal Logic or Temporal Logic versus mathemaatical logic i.e. Proof Theory, Set Theory, Recursion Theory, and Model Theory.
(Visit here for a salacious example of Recursion Theory in the "S&M" Theory)
<font color="blue">http://calbruin.livejournal.com/28842.html[/COLOR]
Here are a few sites for easy reference to learn more.
<font color="blue">http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/philos/maths[/COLOR]
<font color="red">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_logic [/COLOR]
<font color="yellow">http://drfaustusod.tripod.com/scriptorium/id17.html[/COLOR]
(You will need to cut & paste, I thought hyperlinking was supported.)
I did not imply, you inferred incorrectly.
To correct your mis-understanding:
Although Logic as a sub-branch of Mathematics has philosophical underpinnings and roots, Logic, or somethings refer to as Foundations, is a branch of Mathematics investigating the strength of aximatic scheme that many mathematicians take for granted. An algebraist does not worry about the Axiom of Choice, they just use it or not in their proofs. A logician worrys about the Foundations Axiom aka Axiom of Choice.
Further note: there is a difference between "philosophical" logic e.g. Modal Logic or Temporal Logic versus mathemaatical logic i.e. Proof Theory, Set Theory, Recursion Theory, and Model Theory.
(Visit here for a salacious example of Recursion Theory in the "S&M" Theory)
<font color="blue">http://calbruin.livejournal.com/28842.html[/COLOR]
Here are a few sites for easy reference to learn more.
<font color="blue">http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/philos/maths[/COLOR]
<font color="red">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_logic [/COLOR]
<font color="yellow">http://drfaustusod.tripod.com/scriptorium/id17.html[/COLOR]
(You will need to cut & paste, I thought hyperlinking was supported.)
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
an answers to an old question
chicken
chicken
Good_Scientist
Temporal Navigator
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
NO, I even spoke to a mathematician friend on this one, and Arithmetic IS the simplest and purest form of maths, no question, no arguement.
You implied it and I inferred that you couldn't do physics, what possible other implication were you trying to get across, and what possible other conclusion could I have come to.
GS
NO, I even spoke to a mathematician friend on this one, and Arithmetic IS the simplest and purest form of maths, no question, no arguement.
You implied it and I inferred that you couldn't do physics, what possible other implication were you trying to get across, and what possible other conclusion could I have come to.
GS
ProfessorFaustus
Chrono Cadet
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
They are incorrect.
If you bother to read the references to which I linked in the previous post, you can come to understand why.
There is nothing "pure" about arithmetic because is it entirely operational, in other words, application of basic operators: + (plus), - (minus), x (multiplication), and / (division).
If you have any further questions or you do not understand something, then ask me.
I write what I mean and mean what I write, no more, no less.
They are incorrect.
If you bother to read the references to which I linked in the previous post, you can come to understand why.
There is nothing "pure" about arithmetic because is it entirely operational, in other words, application of basic operators: + (plus), - (minus), x (multiplication), and / (division).
If you have any further questions or you do not understand something, then ask me.
I was not implying, I was directly claiming that I do not do physics, nothing more, nothing less was claimed. What I wrote is completely transparent to anyone who is not seeking some hidden alternative meaning.
I write what I mean and mean what I write, no more, no less.
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Let's get down yet another coincidence. I speak fluent Spanish - Javier speaks fluent Spanish. I've used every word on the "Magic List" that Javier has used. Cipher and Jim Scannel also used the same words in posts. Raimnan used all of them as well - as did Buzzmaker. It follows, logically that --->
Darby is Javier Cortez. Javier is Titor. Buzzmaker is Javier. Cipher is Jim Scannell. Jim Scannel is Javier. ProfessorFaustus is Javier. Sheldon Ross is ProfessorFaustus.
Darby must, therefore, be Titor, Javier, Cipher, Jim Scannell, Buzzmaker, Rainman and Sheldon Mark Ross.
OK - I've been caught. I'm all of them. So I also have to confess: I'm also Pamela, CAT, Larry Haber, Brandon Haber, Ben Z, Roel van Houten, Raul Burriel, Paul Curran, Adam Ruell and Creedo.
I got so caught up in being everyone on the forum that I let my Cipher and Scannell characters plant logic bombs that exploded on my other characters and revealed them all.
Dude, I have to apologize. I had everyone in the realm freaked out in an attempt to be taken seriously with this tiresome, obscure debate. I had everyone convinced over the Titor thing for six years that I was just me - Darby. Now I have to bring it on, brother, and slap myself around. But I have had some insight into the matter:
Plainly its a good thing that I'm actually the only member of the forum. Otherwise someone might get a bit pissed off over this twist of fate. And then, oh baby, my well thought out decisions and actions would be for naught.
Let's get down yet another coincidence. I speak fluent Spanish - Javier speaks fluent Spanish. I've used every word on the "Magic List" that Javier has used. Cipher and Jim Scannel also used the same words in posts. Raimnan used all of them as well - as did Buzzmaker. It follows, logically that --->
Darby is Javier Cortez. Javier is Titor. Buzzmaker is Javier. Cipher is Jim Scannell. Jim Scannel is Javier. ProfessorFaustus is Javier. Sheldon Ross is ProfessorFaustus.
Darby must, therefore, be Titor, Javier, Cipher, Jim Scannell, Buzzmaker, Rainman and Sheldon Mark Ross.
OK - I've been caught. I'm all of them. So I also have to confess: I'm also Pamela, CAT, Larry Haber, Brandon Haber, Ben Z, Roel van Houten, Raul Burriel, Paul Curran, Adam Ruell and Creedo.
I got so caught up in being everyone on the forum that I let my Cipher and Scannell characters plant logic bombs that exploded on my other characters and revealed them all.
Dude, I have to apologize. I had everyone in the realm freaked out in an attempt to be taken seriously with this tiresome, obscure debate. I had everyone convinced over the Titor thing for six years that I was just me - Darby. Now I have to bring it on, brother, and slap myself around. But I have had some insight into the matter:
Plainly its a good thing that I'm actually the only member of the forum. Otherwise someone might get a bit pissed off over this twist of fate. And then, oh baby, my well thought out decisions and actions would be for naught.
Scannell
Chrono Cadet
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Darby,
Hey man LOL I didn’t say I was Cipher, I’m just Scannell, (and not the other Jscannell). And as Scannell, I’m just speculate’n, my opinion, and that’s all, just SPECULATE’N given what information Cipher presented to us.
Anyone in their right mind would have to be clueless to not see that in some way you must also have a intervene'n MOTIVE with the Titor story. Because we simply know that this is what’s keep'n it going.
If You, Pam and Florida Slim Jim weren’t here to speak and comment, this Titor story would have been done with years ago. Now we see a different kind of learned maneuver happening with all these cloakers.
And your point is Darby, those duplicate words mean diddly-squat if used AFTER THE FACT. I know Cipher mentioned something about the importance the “timing†of the words had.
Yep, the dude sure did, here’s what Cipher said:
LOL, your Chi Square didn’t even account for “TIMINGâ€!!
Darby, I’ve got to tell ya again, fence sitting is the devil's dilemma. It's neither doing nor not doing. It's the wobbling compromise that makes no one happy. Its lukewarm tea, the devil's own brew.
Darby,
Hey man LOL I didn’t say I was Cipher, I’m just Scannell, (and not the other Jscannell). And as Scannell, I’m just speculate’n, my opinion, and that’s all, just SPECULATE’N given what information Cipher presented to us.
Anyone in their right mind would have to be clueless to not see that in some way you must also have a intervene'n MOTIVE with the Titor story. Because we simply know that this is what’s keep'n it going.
If You, Pam and Florida Slim Jim weren’t here to speak and comment, this Titor story would have been done with years ago. Now we see a different kind of learned maneuver happening with all these cloakers.
And your point is Darby, those duplicate words mean diddly-squat if used AFTER THE FACT. I know Cipher mentioned something about the importance the “timing†of the words had.
Yep, the dude sure did, here’s what Cipher said:
LOL, your Chi Square didn’t even account for “TIMINGâ€!!
Darby, I’ve got to tell ya again, fence sitting is the devil's dilemma. It's neither doing nor not doing. It's the wobbling compromise that makes no one happy. Its lukewarm tea, the devil's own brew.
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Scannell,
I see. Please enlighten me on the Chi-Square Test. And then enlighten me on the parameters that I set when I posted the original tests. I must have missed something...though I don't think so.
(And why am I posting to myself here?)
Scannell,
I see. Please enlighten me on the Chi-Square Test. And then enlighten me on the parameters that I set when I posted the original tests. I must have missed something...though I don't think so.
(And why am I posting to myself here?)
Darby
Epochal Historian
Re: Can do but choose not to do.
Scannell,
Huh?
You mean that I took my time machine forward from April 2004 to May 2006, saw that Cipher was going to post something about Javier and a list of words, took my time machine back to April 2004 and did a Chi-Square Analysis on Buzzmaker and posted the results with the specific intent of foiling Cipher's analysis circa 2006 from the year 2004?
Yikes! I'm a genius.
Scannell,
Huh?
You mean that I took my time machine forward from April 2004 to May 2006, saw that Cipher was going to post something about Javier and a list of words, took my time machine back to April 2004 and did a Chi-Square Analysis on Buzzmaker and posted the results with the specific intent of foiling Cipher's analysis circa 2006 from the year 2004?
Yikes! I'm a genius.