Lussorio F
Temporal Novice
I don't know where you get you information from but you wrong! My rebuttals to the various skeptic's arguments that can be read on that forum, dismisses your claim that I was debunked.
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello I'm from the year 2046
- Thread starter Lussorio F
- Start date
Lussorio F
Temporal Novice
With all due respect, I don’t know who you are. You could be anyone from a government goon at to steal the advance technology that I came to this time period with. To just some weirdo who wants to truss me up like a turkey and dribble over me in a sweaty leather ski mask. But I’m prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt contact me privately with some details about yourself and we will talk about a possible meeting with conditions.
Last edited by a moderator:
hard-worker
Temporal Navigator
Over here in Canada our son of a rich man who was son of a rich man, prime minister son of a prime minister is just loved for unknown reasons. His father gave us a seperation from England. I believe that this one will cause Canada as it is now, being dissolved and many smaller countries being formed.
In your future will Canada as it is now actually become 6 or more countries?
In your future will Canada as it is now actually become 6 or more countries?
Lussorio F
Temporal Novice
That certainly true of the EU that broke up to smaller regions in the world-line that I came from and even though events are unfolding in a slightly different manner in this world-line. It that it going to happen here to. But and this may be of some good news.,unlike in my world-line the demise of the north America and Canada may not be so dramatic.
ScornedTramp
Chrono Cadet
Maybe you could run some future concepts or theories by us, perhaps something that is unheard of in our time, so as that we could discuss or debate it.
Lussorio F
Temporal Novice
I explained in some detail on another forum and somewhere on this forum, that my temporal manipulation device does not work to your model of time travel that is quite frankly ludicrous.
QUESTION FOR YOU:- how using your concept of time travel do you resolve the grandfather paradox.? Ever heard of causality?
Last edited by a moderator:
Lussorio F
Temporal Novice
Because his model violates causality, which is fundamental to all natural science, especially physics. Anyone who has study physics at high school will be scratching there head at his odd concept and understanding of basic physics. The fact he unable to explain how his model of the time travel resolves classic paradoxes, speaks volumes. Then hes busting my balls, by holding my CLAIMS to a unscientific model. I don't mind being scrutinized, I welcome it, but lets be scrutinize with sound science.
Last edited by a moderator:
ScornedTramp
Chrono Cadet
I'm with Einstein on this one. I feel like Lussorio is more focused on what we do or don't know, and is offering very little in the way of subject matter.
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not meaning to be rude, but he said on another message board that you can create a microsingularity at home with household objects. I think this statement makes this entire case debunked.
"Where do you get the micro-singularity?
I believe a rudimentary one can be made at home with simple everyday household objects if your the technicality minded type."
"Where do you get the micro-singularity?
I believe a rudimentary one can be made at home with simple everyday household objects if your the technicality minded type."
Last edited by a moderator:
1993... for a "lost" tech... how do you know it existed if it was "lost"... why would you, or your superiors, believe it will exist in "this" T/L since this T/L was created when you entered it?
(Dimension Theory Of Temporal Travel ) was explained by a technician to me along these lines, that for every decision or action that's made, the alternative is played out in another reality. He when on to explain in the most simplest of terms, That the act of simply travelling back in time creates a new "world-line", distinct from the one from which you left. So by going back in time you can change events but those changes wont effect YOU, or the world-line you came from. You just prevent another version of yourself from a (lag reality) undergoing the experience. However the (Dimension Theory Of Temporal Travel ) means there are already versions of yourself that haven't undergone the experience you want to change. You can only go forward in time in the same world-line, not back without it becoming a new reality. There sadly a number of users on this forum that are not going to grasp these concepts due to being ill-educated in basic mathematics and science and dare I say lacing in common sense.
Serious Claim - How my temporal displacement device (time machine) works!
( I won't begin questioning what "Time Laws" exist that also create a "PAST" whenever a "NEW" T/L is created by all you TT'ers out there... seeing as how " I " remember "existing" before 1993.)
"Do you know John Titor or heard of him? Does he exist in your timeline?
Yes, we are part of the same division."
Hello I'm from the year 2046
JT and you end up on the same time-line. How fortunate for us... and you. I mean, what are the odds that both you and John would "create" the same T/L.
Why do you offer revelations of "our" future (or our possible future)? You can only offer what has occurred in "your" T/L. You are engaging in the same mistake JT made when he capitulated and begin answering questions about the future and "his" civil war.
This sounds to me like just another weak attempt at perpetuating the same story all over again. These Tales FAIL at the statement, "I first went back to XXXX year to retrieve a Blah blah blah... ".
I'd like to say, "Nice try." but it isn't.
Last edited by a moderator:
Based on the last few responses outlining the problems with this story and the lack of substance being provided, I'm applying the "Confirmed Hoax" prefix to this thread.
@Lussorio F if at any point you're able to provide substantive information or proof, we'll of course revert the thread prefix change.
@Lussorio F if at any point you're able to provide substantive information or proof, we'll of course revert the thread prefix change.