Greetings from 2025.

Heck signe me up on that one too! :D

Anyway i guess if he comes back, he'll just come with some excuse to why he either can't or doesnt want to give any proofs, as they usually do.
 
Anyway i guess if he comes back, he'll just come with some excuse to why he either can't or doesnt want to give any proofs, as they usually do.

and it better be a darn good excuse too, none of this "my wife won't let me" or "the time machine doesn't work that way". I know if a real TT came to the boards they would be limited in what they could say, but come on at least give us a plausible explanation...
 
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gifLol! And stuff. This has got to be the funniest attempt at a tt yet. Didn't work so he/she will go elsewhere. Or, if they think they can con it a bit carry on for a while whilst increasing the number of visitors to this site by trying to get his/her 'friends' to see how clever he/she is.
To the 'friends' of 'Zeshua', don't you think it sad that your friend is trying to con people who know better? I'd pummel the person in the playground tommorrow if I were you guys. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
 
Zeshua,

Although not neccesary for the tunnel, per Lorenz, using Time Dilation, we define the tunnel in seconds.

I'll give you a break and take you literally - that you mean (Ludwig) Lorenz and not (Hendrik) Lorentz here.

Time Dilation? Lorenz? Lorenz died 14 years before Einstein published the Special Theory of Relativity in 1905.

Maybe you really did mean Lorentz, who died in 1928. But his work was in E&M/Optics.

Hmmm...quantum tunneling. Four years after Lorentz died (1932) von Neumann published the first paper on QM that had a firm grasp on the math and took the issue beyond both Heisenberg and Dirac.

Just tell us...who is Lorenz? Please. And point us to where he makes reference to quantum tunneling or time dilation. (Ludwig Lorenz, like Hendrick Lorentz, worked in E&M. He didn't work in QM or Special/General Relativity because they hadn't been discovered prior to his death.)

And how do you define "seconds"? (A rigorous definition).
 
The most recent post in this forum is very interesting, still seems like a big joke of a story but also some interesting things, I posted a link to something in this guys post to the thread, the link url was wrong but the address was right.
 
I have no idea where that puts him. In 20 years, there is a leap year 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024, so that is five and not four!

I have no idea where this guy is from but there are 365.25~ days in a year. That is until you get into astronomy then it is 365.2422 days, so he called it -- 0.24219 which would be about correct, I guess.

But still from 2005 to 2025 and that is 20 years there are 5 years that are leap years!
Unless it is divisible by 4 and 400 and somewhere there is that 100 divisor, so the year 2000 is not a leap year, but 2004 is and was and had a Feb. 29th!
I guess it was divisible by 400 (the year 2000) so that is why it was not a leap year, neither is the year 1600, 1200, 800, whatever!
 
Zesh,

I've been busy (with retirement) so I hadn't gotten around to commenting on your 22-FEB-05 post:

02/22/05 08:17 AM (216.127.72.7) Edit Reply



Greetings All,

It is currently 72 degrees on February 22nd 2025 and this is my now attempt #20.
[Shooting for 20 years .25>.24219, (4*.24219 is .96876~1)*4=3.87504~4 should put this at Feb 22nd 2005]

...snip...

Responses will be slow but also instantaneous, be patient.

You used a formula to calculate your number of days between 22-FEB-05 and 22-FEB-25 but you misculculated the number of leap years. There are 5 not 4. They are 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024. Add another ~6 hours for the time between 29-FEB-2024 and 22-FEB-2025 and you should have posted at approximately 0215 hours on 21-FEB-05, not 0817 hrs on 22-FEB-05.

You made another big error in your calculation. You used tropical years instead of sidereal years. THey are not the same, my friend. You not only missed the date but your tunnel opened up somewhere other than where the Earth "should" have been.

Next time your time tavelers should check with an astronomer (who would tell you what time it is) rather than a computer geek (who can't tell time).
 
Of course someone posted a post that couldn't be answered by this Zeshua fellow so of course we'll never hear from him again. He'll never make another attempt to post on this site. Maybe on some other. This is nothing new. I've been on some other sites before and everyone who has ever posted a message saying they are posting from the future has been proven a fake. Of course John Titor claimed to be in the present time so this type of test couldn't be run with him...but you know...
 
Back
Top