Since the singularity was less than the size of an electron (I think that's how it was described) and the dual event horizons were somehow merged or manipulated' date=' I would have to guess that this was the place where he could be in without destroying himself.[/quote']The "field" enveloped the entire vehicle and, according to JT, scooped some earth from beneath the unit also. He WAS IN IT. How does that protect him from it?More "assumptions" please.
I could "debunk" each of your statements, one by one, but you guys don't like to have to keep seeing your falderal pointed out.
I guess most of the people here reading TTI know the debunkers' opinions, so i don't get the repeating thing all over,Clogging every damn threat about Titor with the same old debunk phrases.OK ppl (<=titor debunkers) i heard your opinion the last 8 years PLEASE stop posting the same arguments and let the others breath.
Believe me, I am tired of repeating it too and I haven't done it for as long as quite a few others, but I have a problem with just letting ignorance go unchallenged. It can become contagious.
yeah i like those thread-closing-i'm-60-years-old-know-all-debunking-coments as well.
Actually, Im over 60, and I do not think I "know-all" but, I can spot BS when I see it and apparently, I can see it better than many others. They say, hind sight is 20/20. Well, with over 60 years of hind sight... it serves me well enough.
Takes away ANY possibility to discuss....so are we supposed to stop fantasising and think freely?
Ummmm... Yes? There is a difference in fantisizing and accepting fantasy as reality.
On the (civil-)war side i just say one more thing:
Everything after that line is opinion and your opinion, even when it's complete jibberish and wrong, is yours and actual facts are unlikely to alter it so, I won't waste any time with that.If you JT fans want to hold him as a prophet, or your mesiah, or even "a real" time traveler, you go for it, but don't expect me or anyone else that knows he was fake, to not point out the absurdity of these claims.
In the same allusion that you say, I am set in my ways and won't look at anything new, (which is incorrect) I could say you are set in your mind and choose to not accept evidence that is contrary to your belief so, my posts are for the new people exposed to this BS for the first time...not you... If you don't like your beliefs challenged... go to a site that accepts BS as real stuff. Or, stay right here... and learn something. What I like about this site is, ideas will be challenged, and a better understanding can and usually does, (at least for me) develope.
I think the issue with all the debunkers is they never actually got the "big picture".
Or, they actually do have the "BIG picture" and "know" when BS is BS.
They didn't want to believe in the story to begin with' date=' so they overlooked all the subtleties that led to a larger more truthful portrait.[/quote']Subtleties?? "... overlooked the subtleties"?? Have you ever watched a movie... read a fictional book, attended a live play? Have you never noticed, that any good movie, fiction book, or play, is FULL of subtleties?? That's what makes the story GOOD. Even when fictional, subtleties are what make it "seem" believable.
What's the saying? "You can't see the forest from the trees"
What's the saying? "Ignorance is bliss."