Debunked in 5 Minutes

they can right books on it but they never came out and said heres how to time travel and unless somone physically proves it can happen i will always doubt it but seeing as you guys cant learn to think logicaly im just gonna stop posting cuz its a waste of my time so good bye then
 
I hesitate to reveal my attempts at time travel, as I am neither a scientist nor technically minded person, I have mostly been a passenger, or spectator to certain events that have left me in awe, confused, and generally dazed by their actuality. Time travel is a fact, concrete and very real. It is just the discussion, the attempt to convey something which must be impossible, and finding that it is possible, no matter what you do that is against the accepted scientific norm. I can only say that what some of you remember from school, will prove to be boulderdash, scientific heresy is alive and well and you are living it right now. Remember, you are told that you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, that will be proven to be inaccurate, there are stars out there now that are breaking these rules. If you can travel faster than the speed of light you will transcend known time, you can choose where to alight if you wish. I will say that my first foray into the world of timetravel nearly cost my crew and I our lives, such were we ill prepared for the time we arrived at. A clue: if you go back a thousand years, do not expect the air to be the same as it is now, the bends can, as you all know be fatal, we were lucky, stupid, but lucky.
 
no i havent
Click to expand...

Well, before you start taking the Mickey out of people because they believe in certain scientific possibilities, it's probably a good idea to actually know something about the subject at hand. It's something of a safeguard against coming accross like an over-excitable child.

[...]i never said i was smart[...]
Click to expand...

Good move. Stick to not saying that.

[...]i never said i was smart[...]
Click to expand...

No, you said you could "easily" disprove that time travel was possible 10 times over in less than 5 minutes - in other words to conclusively falsify the work of Einstein, Hawking and many, many more in under 30 seconds. As you have not done so, I stick by my initial assessment that you're full of crap.

im just saying what i feel
Click to expand...

No, saying what you feel would be saying that you, personally don't believe that time travel is possible. Making a statement beyond that would be saying that you could easily disprove the possibilty in less than half a minute. And mocking everybody on this board (which we have to assume you did specially for this reason) because you, personally, don't believe what more informed others think could be possible goes way beyond just saying what you feel.

[...]seeing as you guys cant learn to think logicaly[...]
Click to expand...

How on Earth do you define the word "logic"? Is it logical to claim to be able to disprove decades of scientific research in front of an entire community while mocking them when you actually know nothing about the subject at all, therefore leaving yourself open to nothing but ridicule? Is that logical in any way, shape or form? I admit that you've seen that you're no match for sparring with people here and have decided to quit while you've got some shreds of dignity left, which is logical, so there's hope for you yet.
 
hawking and einstein said there was time travel and how it worked? what is the book called and is it available in libraries?
 
Very well said trollface.

Before you can disprove this, can you define time for us, define the future for us, define the past for us.

You have disproved the theory of time travel in a very superficial way. But time is just a dimension, like up, down and across, you can move through it, you can manipulate it, you can do what ever you want with it. But do find the true answer, you must answer what time excaclty is.
 
you must answer what time excaclty is.
Click to expand...

More seriously, time in itself may be nothing at all. It may not consist of any particular componets that make up a construct of "time".

The components that do seem to be involved is the position/vibrational dynamics of energy, matter and frequency It is the manipulation of any of these components that would effect the process of other elements. I.e. the pilot of the SR-71 flying at full speed across the globe experiences a slowing down of time. Is " time " actually slowing down, or are the essenses of the mass in motion within the sphere of influence of high velocity just reacting to the forces placed upon them? Time itself just a passive, ghost of the event.
 
Back
Top