Dealing With Chronohistorian

Sosue'

What you're doing here, is brining politics into time travel.

If you adopt your view and enter into time travel this way, you would cause a 90% timeline divergence, instead of only a 70% divergence, which is the known complaint now.

Yes the fundamentalist in Iraq do talk to the fundamentalist in Iran.

Not good.

I can't say more than that are youre trying to assemble legions, not time travel.

Why are you here in the first place?
 
We didn't hold a gun to their head like Saddam did.
Click to expand...
We Didn't?

I have no doubt that a democratic society, if embrassed, in Iraq will make the world a better place. I just wish I could travel time and ask our weasel of a president to hold his horses before invading Iraq and give the rest of the world a chance to get behind us... he really jumped the gun with this war.

Why do we have almost 50% of male black-americans in our prison system right now. Can't answer that either.
Click to expand...
I can /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif It's called racial profiling. For example, I believe that there are just as many white people driving around with a pocket full of dope as there are blacks but the police stop more blacks than whites. Obviously, this only leads to more blacks being jailed and promotes the police to profile but if they stopped and searched more white people, the numbers would change significantly... it's a nasty and unjust cycle.

Why did they abuse at these Iraq based prisons?
Click to expand...
I believe they did it not only because they were told to but also because they are terrified. Lets face it, most of the kids that joined our armed forces before the war, joined to either get out of the ghetto, get money for college, or just buy a little time, most of them never thought they'd actualy be killing people, nor do most of them have the heart to do so. I believe that most of them are very affraid over there and fear works in strange ways. I'm not saying what they did was right but in a messed up situation like the war in iraq I can see how things like this could happen when fear gains control. I think most of them don't understand why they are there, as most americans don't understand it either and our government and the media seem to enjoy pulling the wool over our eyes. I think all we want as Americans, soldiers and humans is the truth and I believe we have heard very little of that since 9\11

Can anyone travel back and slap Georgy Bush in the back of the head on the day he decided to move forward with this war? Tell him that he is going to make a mochary of America and damage our rep in the world. I agree Sadam should have been thrown out of power and the Iraqi people deserve to live in a democratic society but we should have waited for the support of the rest of our neighbors on this planet before dropping bombs.

that's my 2 cents,

1stBorn
 
If you adopt your view and enter into time travel this way, you would cause a 90% timeline divergence, instead of only a 70% divergence, which is the known complaint now.
Click to expand...

I can't say more than that are youre trying to assemble legions, not time travel.
Click to expand...

You're right, Creedo. Thanks for calling me on this. I'll drop it.

My only excuse is that Chrono led me into it, indirectly, with his comment about Hitler.

Consider this case closed.
 
Did the powers that be ever solve the existence problem of instant travel. (The star trek transporter thoery)?. ie Was it determined that you are the same person who left, or an exact copy of that person, meaning the original traveller ceased to exist?. ie if you change the quantum state of sub atomic particles, does it BECOME the original , or is it just an exact copy?.
 
Perhaps if one uses those faster than light particles, to copy the state, then true time travel would be possible, you could transport yourself to another time using quantum entanglment.
 
Lets clear up all this hitler nonsense,

Hilter was neither a 'good' leader, nor was he a good man. Infact he was a bit of a mentalist, if you will. He was neither any good at leading others for any valid reasons

He was however an 'effective' leader. Perhaps this is a better phrase that doesn't step on as many toes. He was a VERY effective leader and had a whole nation of 'his own' people eating out of his own ideals and hungry for more. Few would argue with him, because he convinced so many people that not many of them wanted to. he convinced people to kill others and actually agree with it. He also convinced them that starting a world war was the right thing to do. How many people could do that. Its like Bush and Blair starting the war on Iraq and 100% of the public in both nations in agreement over it. in reality its 50/50 at best.

This has nothing to do with patriotism or national pride (as i might be accused) but Winston Churchill was a 'good' leader. He didn't want to 'invade' or 'exterminate' anyone and responded in war in a self defensive manor. He didn't have to convince anyone because everyone already knew what they had to do. He was an effectivce leader because he motivated troops and a nation when things looked hopeless. He was good leader because he didn't motivate people through delusion of fanatical personal ideals. He motivated a nation for 'good' as he knew Hitler was a demented and would not stop his killing until he wanted too. This is an example of a 'good' leader.

I suppose anyone in the US would be offended if i said the events at pearl harbour were lucky? In that if it hadn't have happened Europe may well have become one giant germany. America would have then lost also. Many more would have died.

Rant over.

Talking of time travel though. It would be interesting to see the alledged Hilter timeline, where Hitler won the war. I would suspect that Pearl Harbour or the Normandy beach landings didn't occur in that time line. What do you reckon?




Kind regards,
OllyB.

p.s. excuse spelling
 
Back
Top