RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Darby & Pamela:
While I appreciate Darby highlighting and clarifying my point about Pamela's tendency to always pop-up and act in the role of "information validator" (and he got it spot-on), I am more interested in calling attention to the primary point I have made in my response to Pamela.
Pamela, I can appreciate that you may not have the time or inclination to respond to all my points regarding your logic. However, this single point is probably the most important one I have made. And I think not only that Darby would agree, but I think he has also pointed this out more than once as well. Certainly I would think you should be at least as interested in the answer to this question as you would be in asking an alleged time traveler all sorts of unrelated questions.
It is a total non-sequitor for a time traveler who claims "I don't really care if you believe me" to even find it necessary to make their claim in the first place. Why the need for the claim?
I have a theory, and unfortunately it speaks more to the fact that these claimants are NOT time travelers, but instead hoaxers who wish to impress upon you certain thoughts, most often of a political nature. If someone (non-time traveler) wanted to influence what you thought may occur in our future, perhaps in an effort to get you and others to take specific actions, how effective would they be in getting you to do this if you thought they were just another person? They need some sort of "hook" that will draw you in. Something that will make you treat them as somehow more credible than psychics and mediums who claim to predict the future (or someone who claims to be enlightened enough to do so). Claiming to be a time traveler is that very hook. While they say they do not care if you believe them, their need to make the claim itself is indeed designed to (hopefully) get you to believe what they are going to tell you about the future. And as we have seen, what they tell us about the future is invariably a story of gloom and doom.
I can think of no other reason for them to make this claim, other than to get your attention and to hopefully gain credibility so you listen to their propaganda. If someone else can enlighten me for another valid reason for them making their claim (and then saying they don't care if you believe them), I AM ALL EARS. Explain it to me.
RMT
While I appreciate Darby highlighting and clarifying my point about Pamela's tendency to always pop-up and act in the role of "information validator" (and he got it spot-on), I am more interested in calling attention to the primary point I have made in my response to Pamela.
WHAT DOES THE CLAIM TO BE A TIME TRAVELER SERVE???? Every single hoaxer we have seen (including Titor) has been emphatic that they do not care if we believe them. If this is true, and they are not just seeking attention, then WHY MAKE THE CLAIM? This is the question that is never sufficiently answered.
Pamela, I can appreciate that you may not have the time or inclination to respond to all my points regarding your logic. However, this single point is probably the most important one I have made. And I think not only that Darby would agree, but I think he has also pointed this out more than once as well. Certainly I would think you should be at least as interested in the answer to this question as you would be in asking an alleged time traveler all sorts of unrelated questions.
It is a total non-sequitor for a time traveler who claims "I don't really care if you believe me" to even find it necessary to make their claim in the first place. Why the need for the claim?
I have a theory, and unfortunately it speaks more to the fact that these claimants are NOT time travelers, but instead hoaxers who wish to impress upon you certain thoughts, most often of a political nature. If someone (non-time traveler) wanted to influence what you thought may occur in our future, perhaps in an effort to get you and others to take specific actions, how effective would they be in getting you to do this if you thought they were just another person? They need some sort of "hook" that will draw you in. Something that will make you treat them as somehow more credible than psychics and mediums who claim to predict the future (or someone who claims to be enlightened enough to do so). Claiming to be a time traveler is that very hook. While they say they do not care if you believe them, their need to make the claim itself is indeed designed to (hopefully) get you to believe what they are going to tell you about the future. And as we have seen, what they tell us about the future is invariably a story of gloom and doom.
I can think of no other reason for them to make this claim, other than to get your attention and to hopefully gain credibility so you listen to their propaganda. If someone else can enlighten me for another valid reason for them making their claim (and then saying they don't care if you believe them), I AM ALL EARS. Explain it to me.
RMT