RenUnconscious
Quantum Scribe
Ollyb,
I agree..
I agree..
Whoops. Hang on a sec, Ren. Is there some rule or law that I don't know about that says Life (and therefore the Creation thereof) must always be based on DNA as we know it (or even carbon for that matter?)?the point I am trying to make is, we do not have the technology to Create life, only duplicate it, engineer it, mess with it. because, Honestly, how do you make a cell? lets just say we are talking about an amoeba, its pretty simple. first you have to somehow create the DNA, hundreds of billions of amino acids in a precise order. Then you have to have a cell to put it in. I'm NOT talking about taking an existing cell and ripping the DNA out of it. I'm talking about Creating a cell from scratch.
Exactly. And "golems" have been created in past times, and will be created again. But as you say, this is just one example.The "golem" is but just a crude example of this.
And indeed this is completely, scientifically accurate. Our universe expands at The Speed of Light... SQUARED! That squared factor (in E=mc^2) defines a surface... if you consider that surface as the bubble of light defined by the Speed of Light, then we can say that we live in a "Hubble Bubble" defined by the surface of the expanding universe's light energy.It seems as though the universe "expands" to accomodate the idea.
Again, you've hit the nail on the head with your distinction, Zerub. It is the next-higher systemic level ABOVE what we call "natural". Systems embedding within systems, all in a swirl of Creation! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gifSome may view this as supernatural. I vew it as SUPER--natural.
Another whoops! OK, I do see that now. But now I am a bit confused by what you are saying. Here let me help you understand my confusion:did you not read my last post? I specifically said life may not even be based on DNA or carbon. it is entirely possible in my opinion to have life based on something other than DNA as we know it and carbon.
But then you go on to say:Thats why I think no Scientist is ever going to create life, just screw around with existing life.
I'm not saying its impossible to create life
we have no common culture or even a common language shared by all individuals on the planet.
Your tone here sounds a bit sad. What if this ultimate Creator did us an ultimate favor in hiding His/Her existence within science? I think it was OllyB who pointed out that it is not the ANSWER that is fulfilling for any of the questions we have in life, but rather the JOURNEY we undertake and experience in order to arrive at that answer.WE, as a society and a whole, make me sick. We must be like, I dunno, annoying little Ants to intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, Let alone to an Ultimate creator who has chosen to give us a Universe beyond all comprehension and then hide his existence within science itself.
Yep, I will agree that life is not going to be created "solely" by science or a scientist. Hopefully you are not exlcuding science and scientists from playing a part, however large, in achieving it, right? Creating life will take a mixture of elements from all walks of our own lives, IMHO. And, in fact, I believe it will take a healthy balance between Science and Spirituality to achieve the creation of new life.No scientist is ever going to create life. But it may be possible to create life and probably is, I just don't think it will be accomplished by a scientist. I think it will take an element of art, an element of passion, a person who does not function based solely on science and logic. Someone who believes in the power of the human mind.
Totally agree. And since anything is possible, I like to ponder and discuss what might be possible, so that maybe we can help make it become possible.who knows, anything is possible.
Interesting. Yes I do see this view. We're a bunch of bridge-builders! It certainly fits with the connectionist, networked nature of Nature.Consider the possiblity that mankinds purpose is to create alternate bridges for life to come into and leave this realm of existence.
Now I ask you to consider this: If there IS a Creator that fashioned us as lifeforms, and if the universe IS characterized by fractal, embedded, non-linear, closed loops... then would it not stand to reason that the penultimate achievement towards which we are headed is to also be able to CREATE LIFE?
Yes, I can see your point here. But as a counterpoint, biologics seem to have a greater capacity for self-regeneration and repair. Not to say that eletronics might not also get to this stage as well.I don't think biologics would be around once the power of machines is fully harvested.