"actually, science is and i love it. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
science says that perfection can be achieved through randomness. if that is so, perfection can also be achieved by will."
"my evidence is my statement, along with everything i have learned about the subject since i have been here. im no scientist, but without perfection from randomness, 2+2 just doesent add up."
You obviosuly dont understand true science. Science is mak9ing a claim or hypothesis, whatever you want to call it, and either proving it through trial and error, disproving it through trial and error, or backing it up with observations or facts you have already collected about it.
You simply state that science says that perfection can be acheived through randomness, and that yourstatement is proof. But "Science" in and of itself proves nothing. What field? Science is never simply science. Both Rainman and I have stated specific fields of science that have provenperfection impossible, and backup our claims up with evidence, not a single sentence.
Your methods are 100% unscientific
"i would go as to say that infinity IS perfection, not like it."
Once again logic can be used to see that you are proving yourself wrong. If infinity is perfection than a human can never attain perfection. In nothing can a human reach infinity because it goes forever. Infinity is not graspable by humans in anything because the idea of infinity itself means there are no ends, so a human will never reach the ultimate and thus they cannot be perfect. Congratulations you have proven yourself wrong.
"sounds like a place ive heard of before, its called heaven. too bad people cant see how its done there."
Hey guess what, I was thinking about heaven when I wrote that, wouldn't ya know it. Your statement furthers your arguement none, I don't know why I'm even answering this. You have provided an archetype in heaven that your "perfect" humans cant match up to. If you believe in heaven you have just stated that there is another level above humanity that humanity cannot reach. I'm going to chalk this up as proving yourself wrong also.
"the only way the world will ever be that way is if the entire world decides to work together, pay no attention to their differenes, and all have a common cause. if one person does not go with it, the chain will fall. this will never happen of course, but that is the correct solution."
When I read the first line or so of this I thought "yeah, but thats never going to happen,"
but you beat me to the punch. Once again you have proven your statement useless.
"i would like to ask you and ray something. why do yall believe that the universe is not perfect? why do yall believe the universe is not absolute?"
I don't believe the universe is perfect because overpowering evidence proves that it isn't. If the universe were perfect there wouldn't be any problems. You see, thats what perfection is absolute flawlessness, and the universe is full of flaws, If it weren't flawed, no one would ever die, its that simple. No one would ever kill anything else, there would be no destruction. Jupiter would align with mars, peace would guide the planets, and love would steer the stars. (If you didn't get the reference you suck =P)
"if you believe in bushido, you believe that life and death is perfect."
Considering the fact that I'm not a Japanese warrior, I'm gonna say I don't believe in Bushido. I am a christian though, and christianity teaches that life after death is perfect if you go to heaven, and it sucks ass if you go to hell. I also believe that death is the culmination of imperfection.
"the biggest point in my argument that proves it exists: it is a word we understand, is it not? how could a human comprehend something that is unattainable? how could he even utter the word?"
CONGRATULATIONS, you have finally got it. Humans don't understand it at all. Yet we throw around the word like we know what we are talking about, some of us get it a little bit in the fact that we understand we are not perfect, but none of us can grasp what it is like to be perfect, and thats why we can't attain perfection. People like you, however, ABSOLUTELY don't get it, and should be restricted from saying the word, you thing perfection is some thing that we can get if we want to, but you are so horribly mistaken.
"if this is not true, i could say everything math and science has mapped is a lie. its not perfect, so its useless to me."
HAHAHAHA so your saying if a theory or math problem turns out to be incorrect it is a lie? hahahaha, and that since they are wrong they are automatically useless?
Ok, ok, whew I have to stop laughing, anyway Im going to use a single quote to wipe this one out.
When someone stated that he had failed up to a certain point in his lightbulb research Thomas Edison was indignant, and he wen on to explain that they had in no way failed but “We now know a thousand ways not to build a light bulbâ€
Just think about that quote, and get back to me when you understand its implications.
"if you throw something up in the air, it always comes down right?"
Once aga9in science is absolutely not on your side, heres how it should read: If you throw something that is more dense than the atmosphere of the earth up, its greater density will cause it not to float, but to sink in the atmosphere, thus returning it to the earth. However if you throw something that is less dense than the earth's atmoshpere into the air, it will float away.
"is that not a perfect law? not a theory? you could say this is not true, airplanes and birds fly right? but other laws come into play with those right? not theories."
No gravity is not a perfect law, humans still don't understand it completely. If you object and think we have a complete grasp on gravity, just go look up an extensive description of black holes and read.
"i dont see how anyone can look into the sky and say that it is not perfect. the "system" of the universe has no flaw in my opinion. although things can be looked at as flawed, until you understand its purpose."
I looked into the sky, and I saw the smog of a billion different pollutants, yep confirmation that the universe is flawed.
"mathematitions say that everything can be made into an equasion. the equasion can only perfect when it is... equal."
I defy you and all mathematicians to conjure up a equation for the logic of a woman. =P
Number of times thus far that Ruthless has proven himself himself wrong: 4
In the words of the illustrious Stan Lee: "EXCELSIOR!"
science says that perfection can be achieved through randomness. if that is so, perfection can also be achieved by will."
"my evidence is my statement, along with everything i have learned about the subject since i have been here. im no scientist, but without perfection from randomness, 2+2 just doesent add up."
You obviosuly dont understand true science. Science is mak9ing a claim or hypothesis, whatever you want to call it, and either proving it through trial and error, disproving it through trial and error, or backing it up with observations or facts you have already collected about it.
You simply state that science says that perfection can be acheived through randomness, and that yourstatement is proof. But "Science" in and of itself proves nothing. What field? Science is never simply science. Both Rainman and I have stated specific fields of science that have provenperfection impossible, and backup our claims up with evidence, not a single sentence.
Your methods are 100% unscientific
"i would go as to say that infinity IS perfection, not like it."
Once again logic can be used to see that you are proving yourself wrong. If infinity is perfection than a human can never attain perfection. In nothing can a human reach infinity because it goes forever. Infinity is not graspable by humans in anything because the idea of infinity itself means there are no ends, so a human will never reach the ultimate and thus they cannot be perfect. Congratulations you have proven yourself wrong.
"sounds like a place ive heard of before, its called heaven. too bad people cant see how its done there."
Hey guess what, I was thinking about heaven when I wrote that, wouldn't ya know it. Your statement furthers your arguement none, I don't know why I'm even answering this. You have provided an archetype in heaven that your "perfect" humans cant match up to. If you believe in heaven you have just stated that there is another level above humanity that humanity cannot reach. I'm going to chalk this up as proving yourself wrong also.
"the only way the world will ever be that way is if the entire world decides to work together, pay no attention to their differenes, and all have a common cause. if one person does not go with it, the chain will fall. this will never happen of course, but that is the correct solution."
When I read the first line or so of this I thought "yeah, but thats never going to happen,"
but you beat me to the punch. Once again you have proven your statement useless.
"i would like to ask you and ray something. why do yall believe that the universe is not perfect? why do yall believe the universe is not absolute?"
I don't believe the universe is perfect because overpowering evidence proves that it isn't. If the universe were perfect there wouldn't be any problems. You see, thats what perfection is absolute flawlessness, and the universe is full of flaws, If it weren't flawed, no one would ever die, its that simple. No one would ever kill anything else, there would be no destruction. Jupiter would align with mars, peace would guide the planets, and love would steer the stars. (If you didn't get the reference you suck =P)
"if you believe in bushido, you believe that life and death is perfect."
Considering the fact that I'm not a Japanese warrior, I'm gonna say I don't believe in Bushido. I am a christian though, and christianity teaches that life after death is perfect if you go to heaven, and it sucks ass if you go to hell. I also believe that death is the culmination of imperfection.
"the biggest point in my argument that proves it exists: it is a word we understand, is it not? how could a human comprehend something that is unattainable? how could he even utter the word?"
CONGRATULATIONS, you have finally got it. Humans don't understand it at all. Yet we throw around the word like we know what we are talking about, some of us get it a little bit in the fact that we understand we are not perfect, but none of us can grasp what it is like to be perfect, and thats why we can't attain perfection. People like you, however, ABSOLUTELY don't get it, and should be restricted from saying the word, you thing perfection is some thing that we can get if we want to, but you are so horribly mistaken.
"if this is not true, i could say everything math and science has mapped is a lie. its not perfect, so its useless to me."
HAHAHAHA so your saying if a theory or math problem turns out to be incorrect it is a lie? hahahaha, and that since they are wrong they are automatically useless?
Ok, ok, whew I have to stop laughing, anyway Im going to use a single quote to wipe this one out.
When someone stated that he had failed up to a certain point in his lightbulb research Thomas Edison was indignant, and he wen on to explain that they had in no way failed but “We now know a thousand ways not to build a light bulbâ€
Just think about that quote, and get back to me when you understand its implications.
"if you throw something up in the air, it always comes down right?"
Once aga9in science is absolutely not on your side, heres how it should read: If you throw something that is more dense than the atmosphere of the earth up, its greater density will cause it not to float, but to sink in the atmosphere, thus returning it to the earth. However if you throw something that is less dense than the earth's atmoshpere into the air, it will float away.
"is that not a perfect law? not a theory? you could say this is not true, airplanes and birds fly right? but other laws come into play with those right? not theories."
No gravity is not a perfect law, humans still don't understand it completely. If you object and think we have a complete grasp on gravity, just go look up an extensive description of black holes and read.
"i dont see how anyone can look into the sky and say that it is not perfect. the "system" of the universe has no flaw in my opinion. although things can be looked at as flawed, until you understand its purpose."
I looked into the sky, and I saw the smog of a billion different pollutants, yep confirmation that the universe is flawed.
"mathematitions say that everything can be made into an equasion. the equasion can only perfect when it is... equal."
I defy you and all mathematicians to conjure up a equation for the logic of a woman. =P
Number of times thus far that Ruthless has proven himself himself wrong: 4
In the words of the illustrious Stan Lee: "EXCELSIOR!"