Co2 not main trigger for ice age.

[Angleochoas]

mr. reactor your post above

"If sunspots activity is related to the cooling of the earth and from the link you posted it seems to be then somewhere the sunspots tell us how much solar energy is reaching the earth. If sunspots are not very active then this seems to suggest the sun itself is in a cooling period and that the earths ice ages are in relation to the suns own warming or cooling periods. Anyway that is what sunspots seem to suggest. As I read there is a debate about this."

When the earth becomes cold ,beyond normal, for whatever reason be prepared for the solar flare. you can make a cauchy surface field to protect you and others. may God be with you and with me.

Not to hijack this response, but I have a question.
So, we know solar flares cause electromagnetic disturbances.
Taking that into consideration, are we still at odds if whatever does such is indeed a form of energy = heat?

Thanks for entertaining my question.
I had a couple sources for reference on this;

Solar Mayhem - Softpedia

According to this, actual solar gas has indeed reached our planet previously;

Cloud of solar gas strikes our planet - CNN Oct. 24th 2003

Solar storm heading for Earth - CNN Dec. 14th 2006

Huge solar flares - increased activity - CNN Jan 21 2005

 

[reactor1967]

Not to hijack this response, but I have a question.
So, we know solar flares cause electromagnetic disturbances.
Taking that into consideration, are we still at odds if whatever does such is indeed a form of energy = heat?

Thanks for entertaining my question.
I had a couple sources for reference on this;

Solar Mayhem - Softpedia

According to this, actual solar gas has indeed reached our planet previously;

Cloud of solar gas strikes our planet - CNN Oct. 24th 2003

Solar storm heading for Earth - CNN Dec. 14th 2006

Huge solar flares - increased activity - CNN Jan 21 2005

Don,t worry about the hijack part. Your good. As far as I know heat is caused by sub-atomic particles gaining speed which means they gained energy. Also, the electron is said to move further away in its orbit as it gains energy. Anyway someone might come along and tell me I am wrong which they are welcome to do so. Heat is a concept of energy being out of balance with other energy. When all energy is the same it is called entropy which means there is a complete balance and no work can be done. But when energy is out of balance then work can be done. Now, this is my view I am not an expert. As for electromagnetic distrubances energy causes that. Electrons when they get slowed down or stoped emit energy. Plasma (heated gas) can conduct electricty and forms magnetic fields when it does conduct electricty. In outter space there is all kinds of EMF energy and radiation because of what is called thermo-dynamics. I don,t know how helpful I was but here was my answer.

 

[Angleochoas]

Does the gravity that exists outside our atmosphere have anything equivalent to directional governance? (IE; North, South, etc).
Is this where we finally get to comprehend 4th dimensional shape? Where it essentially would have to be comprehended and proofed for any practical usefulness?
Leading to a 4th dimensional compass?

 

[reactor1967]

Does the gravity that exists outside our atmosphere have anything equivalent to directional governance? (IE; North, South, etc).
Is this where we finally get to comprehend 4th dimensional shape? Where it essentially would have to be comprehended and proofed for any practical usefulness?
Leading to a 4th dimensional compass?

Interesting. North, East, South, and west can be applied to 2 diminsions. So for a four dimensional compass you need 8 directions for north, east, south, and west. This is just my view on the subject which anymore I don,t claim to be completely right I am just giving my view on the subject. Good luck with this.

 

[Darby]

Interesting. North, East, South, and west can be applied to 2 diminsions. So for a four dimensional compass you need 8 directions for north, east, south, and west.

What's so interesting about it? For any n dimensional coordinate system where you arbitrarily indicate a center point with a scalar central vaule of zero you have a positive and negative direction for the scalar function. Thus the total number of possible signed values for any such coordinate system is 2n - where n is the number of dimensions in the system. It's not an "Oh, wow!"situation. It's an obvious, by definition, system based on the arbitrary definition of the coordinates. Positive and negatie relative coordinates are just that - relative. The values are pre chosen by the person who defines the coordinate system.

Remember, there's no requirement that the system have negative numbers associated with the coordinates. You could number the coordinate of the event as X = some number approaching +infinity by y = another number approaching +infinity and never reference negative numbers; and the output of the equation would be exactly the same as is you used both positive and negative values for the locus of two or more events on your arbitrarily numbered coordinate system. The space-time seperation would be exactly the same regardless of whether or not you have all positive coordinates, all negative coordinates or a combination of positive and negative or positive, negative and imaginary coordinates in your arbitrary system.

 

[reactor1967]

What's so interesting about it? For any n dimensional coordinate system where you arbitrarily indicate a center point with a scalar central vaule of zero you have a positive and negative direction for the scalar function. Thus the total number of possible signed values for any such coordinate system is 2n - where n is the number of dimensions in the system. It's not an "Oh, wow!"situation. It's an obvious, by definition, system based on the arbitrary definition of the coordinates. Positive and negatie relative coordinates are just that - relative. The values are pre chosen by the person who defines the coordinate system.

Remember, there's no requirement that the system have negative numbers associated with the coordinates. You could number the coordinate of the event as X = some number approaching +infinity by y = another number approaching +infinity and never reference negative numbers; and the output of the equation would be exactly the same as is you used both positive and negative values for the locus of two or more events on your arbitrarily numbered coordinate system. The space-time seperation would be exactly the same regardless of whether or not you have all positive coordinates, all negative coordinates or a combination of positive and negative or positive, negative and imaginary coordinates in your arbitrary system.

Well to simply answer your question about why the Oh wow. Not everyone is as smart as you and professor RMT. Somethings I still think are neat even though you are very studied in the matter and they may no longer be of any value to you outside of their mathematical use. You gave a very good post of the subject explaining it more in detail.

Mathematically I still think there is a lot to learn and a lot more fields of study not yet invented or that are unknown. For example as you know I worked on storing data in a number and making that number go up and down in value always staying the same length of digits but the amount of data stored in the number varied with the time it took to decode all the data out of that number. And if I were to take that number actually two numbers and double them then I would also be performing a function on all the numbers stored as data in that number. I am the only person that I know of that does that. So to me mathematics does not yet have all the answers but is working on it. And yes, I may be a little off but I do get a kick out of somethings that to others seem not so very important. Human nature I guess. We are not all the same.