A singularity

On Rainman and I'm going to close.

If they would have stretched into a civilian design, then orbital insertion, would take far less power.

Q factor, or maximum aerodynamic pressure, came from my paper......?

Rainman, you remind me of a famous general who attacked a rather large Indian village.

This guy would not take the advice of his Indian guide constituents, who were cringing in the saddles, at the thought of his prospects.

You don't have to talk to me any longer.

2. For Stalker, I had received a file on Titor to save as an attachment, but don't know what this is, as I am reformatting and will attempt to dump my o.s. tomorrow.

There are agents known as time cops, or time police, who will intercept you, if you are too verbose, in your applications to this project.

They are told of in other web resources on time travel.

I suggests that you look these up?

There are reasons for this./

To those who were polite, I bid you a'du.
 
I really don't think that creedo is a "bot". For instance, "bots" don't typically make up words. It would certainly be an innovation (in my experience) if a bot did, indeed, fabricate it's vocabulary. NLP's (Natural Language Programs) such as Alice, follow strict syntactical and grammatical rules. I've never seen one violate them. This is not to say that one could *not* code a bot that would, but I'd be surprised. (Again, my Psych background has left me somewhat familiar with AI, as it is a HUGE deal in both cognitive psych and cognitive neuro). I really do think, and I can't stress enough that this is NOT a CUT or an ATTACK on creedo, that creedo *IS* schizophrenic. It's not just his "word salads". His posts seem rife with delusions. I would not doubt it if he claimed to all that "Aliens" were "beaming" thoughts into his brain. As to your assertion, Rainman, that he is of above average intelligence... I would contend that most 6 year olds can master English grammar and syntax, yet creedo has demonstrated that this essential communicative skill has eluded him. I dunno. Utter bafflement.

Creedo: I would like to take some tissue samples from your brain. Can I?
 
I believe there are others on this forum that will vouch for what I am saying here. Anyone?
Click to expand...

I'll be more than happy to comply.

The substitution of "string" for "thread" is another potential indication that Creedo is, indeed, a 'Bot.
Click to expand...

Yes, creedo acts and writes as if he is in fact a bot. I've never seen such an advanced bot though.

Roel
 
Well, perhaps I am moving away from my Bot theory of Creedo and moving over to Siegmund's side of schizo. Clear evidence of delusion follows:

Q factor, or maximum aerodynamic pressure, came from my paper......?
Click to expand...

Oh really? So now you are taking credit for Daniel Bernoulli's work, are you? Yes, this would classify as delusional, since Bernoulli quantified the basic concepts of fluid dynamics back in the 18th century!! You can learn about it on NASA's website...you know, the agency that you seem to be denigrating.

If they would have stretched into a civilian design, then orbital insertion, would take far less power.
Click to expand...

And now another attempt at logical imperative, where there is none! Allow me to correct you, just because it is so much FUN!

1) Power is not a measure of efficiency for orbital insertion. Rather, specific impulse is the appropriate measure. And, of course, this is based on the orbit you wish to achieve, which are based on the launch site location, orbital inclination, eccentricity, and perigee.

2) There is no logical imperative that "stretching" (again, what a choice of verbs!) the space shuttle to become a civilian design has any bearing on how much specific impulse is required to achieve orbital insertion for a given mass. You've made a muddle of social issues (civilian vs. government) that have nothing to do with science and engineering. But nice try (NOT)!

3) Keep an eye on Burt Rutan...a REAL engineering prodigy... I predict he will be the first civilian to reach orbit, and yes, he is working on it right now in Mojave, CA.

You don't have to talk to me any longer.
Click to expand...

You're right, I don't. But you make it so much fun that it is hard to resist! And let's not forget, YOU were the one that decided to bring up space shuttles.

RainmanTime
 
Ah, creedo's first name is 'Daniel', and there is another matter about him, but as Rick mentioned, he has to slow down sometimes, I think.

So, we hope you all don't treat people with problems as such as this, when it is obviously some other members of this forum, with the problems.

Now, I do not know creedo's last name, but if it helps, define why you think that anyone else is superior? Frankly, get some religion or something.

Well, I am also older, perhaps, that is why!

/ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
Verity,

The answer to your question isn't simple. The term "singularity" is used in mathematics and has somewhat different meanings depending on the context.

But here's a simplistic answer:

A black hole is a region of time-space that is so gravitationally warped that from within nothing can escape.

A black hole can be defined as having two "parts" - the event horizon and singularity.

The singularity is the region at the "center" of the black hole where space-time is maximally warped. How much it is warped and the topology of the region depends on the class of BH (static, non-charged spinning, charged non-spinning and charged spinning, i.e. Schwarzschild, Kerr, Reissner-Nordstrom and Kerr-Neumann BH's.)

The event horizon is the region surrounding the singularity where gravity is so strong that once that threshhold is crossed nothing can escape. Charged BH's have an inner and outer event horizon.
 
Close your eyes. Do not think of anything anything at all. Forget that you are real remember nothing. Thier is your singularity.
 
When first thought that such an object may exist, by Dr. Stephen Hawkings, years ago, the term "Black Hole" was given as the name of such an object that would bend space-time into an infinity, for lack of better terms to describe such an object. At that time, it was just thought that black holes would exist, but what exactly the object was could not really be determined. With more and more math, and thinking, this gravitational warped well of the distortion of space-time into an infinity and viewed as not having an outlet perhaps, was termed a singularity. Once passing the event horizon, nothing can escape, not even light, and anything caught up in it, may be in that warped space-time distortion, in the manner that would be there (atoms strung out - to even smaller particles or who knows actually), and exist there (if anyone can call it that) forever. Even though now, there is a leakage out of the black hole called the Hawking Radiation, it is only radiation in a form from the black hole, as a result of the action occuring in that warped upon its-self space-time gravitational well, and although perhaps, limited, it is still thought of as being so near to being an infinity, that the term singularity can be used to describe that all dimensions (lenght, height, width, time) that define space-time tend towards a single unknown dimension or just a single dimension.
Thus, the black hole is single (singularity) or as 'one' as a dimension inside.
Since then, other work as been done to provide an explanation as to what exactly a black hole will be as a description to the rest of us mere mortals, where we and regular space-time could never exist and never exit except as some Hawking Radiation.
 
Back
Top