Re: Why was the John Titor \'hoax\' so compelling...
Good question.
Or rather, a basic question.
Which is why it is so odd that so few people ever ask it.
Personally, I never found it compelling or even mildly interesting.
And before I go any further, I should tell you that, while I am a very healthy skeptic, I also happen to believe that ANYTHING is possible (based on my own observations and experiences). Only the human mind is limited - well, up to a point. -
Which is why I find a time machine a highly unattractive - and redundant - contraption.
But, if you ask me, THAT - i.e. a
machine - is the only reason why this figure ever attracted as much attention as it did.
The general reaction was unbelievably pathetic, back in the day... (Or even now, for that matter.)
I mean, here you had adults, many of which self-proclaimed "skeptics" (who would jump at the throat of anyone who'd dare suggest homeopathy, for example - ask Brian Josephson, without going any further), - and yet, they were seemingly unable to even think of a sequence of "plain", sensible questions, nothing to do with machinery (which, I am sure, he/she had rehearsed reasonably well) that would've blown his/her cover in minutes.
Like... "Where does your surname come from? Can you tell us about its etymology? How about its ethnic origins, your family history?" (You don't have to give out any "sensitive", confidential information to answer those questions.)
Supposedly "he" claimed that it was his real name. So... has anyone tried to identify this family? IS there a family of that name in the US?
Finally, let's ask ourselves this simple question:
Would the same people have lavished the same (relatively respectful) attention on this person, had "he" claimed to be a time traveler WITHOUT a machine?
What do you think? ;-)
Anyone?
P.S. By the way, I believe somebody mentioned Hawking as being a possible candidate for the "mastermind" of this petty charade... and "sense of humour" was mentioned even.
I do hope (for his sake) that he is not.
Whoever it was, their words certainly didn't exhibit any sense of humour. Rather, they betrayed an insidious - quite possibly sociopathic - mind. He/she was either babbling (irresponsibility) - or perhaps attempting (however pathetically ineffectual their attempt may have been) to plant a seed of a self-fulfilling prophecy of a bloody "civil war", among other things.
Not a very attractive couple of alternatives, is it?