RainmanTime
Super Moderator
Maybe I can coax Creedo into having a real scientific discussion with this thread title?
If I'm not mistaken, there were at least a couple people who agreed upon the fact that before we can hope to travel through Time, we must understand what it is. Understanding what is meant by the combined dimension known as SpaceTime is one way to approach it. Still another valid approach to understanding Time is to understand its physical multiplicative inverse, namely Frequency.
Everyone always talks about traveling through Time, but few ever talk about traveling through Frequency. I ascribe this to the general public's lack of knowledge about Frequency, and just how much science and engineering know about it.
Mathematically speaking, if you understand Frequency, and can understand what it means to "travel through Frequency" you will be in a better position for understanding Time and thus how to achieve "travel through Time".
So does anyone (Creedo?) wish to have a scientific discussion about the Frequency domain, and Frequency response? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
RMT
If I'm not mistaken, there were at least a couple people who agreed upon the fact that before we can hope to travel through Time, we must understand what it is. Understanding what is meant by the combined dimension known as SpaceTime is one way to approach it. Still another valid approach to understanding Time is to understand its physical multiplicative inverse, namely Frequency.
Everyone always talks about traveling through Time, but few ever talk about traveling through Frequency. I ascribe this to the general public's lack of knowledge about Frequency, and just how much science and engineering know about it.
Mathematically speaking, if you understand Frequency, and can understand what it means to "travel through Frequency" you will be in a better position for understanding Time and thus how to achieve "travel through Time".
So does anyone (Creedo?) wish to have a scientific discussion about the Frequency domain, and Frequency response? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
RMT