Hello DS638,
So basically you could do it, but it’s hard to tell if the dollars and cents of it would ever add up.
I suspect it is like any developing technology we have ever seen in our history: It will be incredibly expensive, and meagerly useful at first. And as we experiment and learn, efficiencies will go up and cost will come down.
For example, I can easily predict that the first application will not be "earth to orbit", because the Delta-V's (velocity changes required for orbit) are so large. However, I could easily see one of the first applications where it would make sense would be for Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters that are used to apply small forces and moments for the purpose of "station keeping".
If you are familiar at all with the Lagrangian libration points in space, then you know that "L1" (which represents the gravity balance point between any two bodies, such as Earth-Moon) is a metastable point. This means, while the energy to maintain that position is minimum (due to its being the gravity balance point between Earth and Moon), it does require fairly frequent "station keeping" burns to maintain an object in that position. This is why we generally establish "halo orbits" centered on metastable points like L1.
A "beamrider" light track propulsion system would be ideal for this application. This would allow one to have a permanent waystation in space in a halo orbit around an L1 point. You would never need to "refuel" the station, you would simply hit it with light beams every so often to maintain its halo orbit.
In point of fact, the Earth-Moon L1 Lagrangian point is the most attractive marshalling point for missions to both the Moon and on to Mars. It is a major operational focus of NASA and their new space exploration initiative.
RMT