Titor and his assumption of Hilary Clinton ?

J

jedgeller

Temporal Novice
Your enemy was in the cities. Was the President in 2005 also on the enemy side? How did you feel personally about the President then?
The President or "leader" in 2005 I believe tried desperately to be the next Lincoln and hold the country together but many of their policies drove a larger wedge into the Bill of Rights. The President in 2009 was interested only in keeping his/her power base.


How he said the President in 2009 he used his/her .... this could be one of Titors few sutle hints

Wow

Was Hilary Clinton suuspected of running for president in 2000 for the 2008 campain ?

This was interesting to me, ive been following the Titor story since 2003 ... his assumption that the 2004 olympics would be the last was interesting since the 2006 occured but if he merely meant the Summer Olympics i guess this year would be the first time we can finally debunk Titor if the 2008 olympics in china dont occur. not too much longer for everyone to wait i presume
 
Jed,

How he said the President in 2009 he used his/her .... this could be one of Titors few sutle hints

Wow

Was Hilary Clinton suuspected of running for president in 2000 for the 2008 campain ?
Click to expand...

I do believe I can say that it was a matter-of-fact that Hillary was planning to run for president even as her husband was stumping to win his first term as president!!! I mean honestly... anyone who was around during the 90s and watched how Hillary played her way from 1st Lady to Senator from New York couldn't POSSIBLY have been surprised by a "Titor prediction" of a him/her... which is really no prediction at all...merely a hedging of bets!


Welcome to the forum,
RMT
 
I hate to disappoint anyone, but Titor stated "his/her power base". Now, I really do not think that a female has a power base. And some people are forgetting who votes in Elections every four years vs. just voting for some members of Congress because they are in for six years. I did not know that Iowa was full of them either all that much. Those people are Evangelicals (spelling?) and that will be that. It will be a man and a lot of people will not like the voting religious.
 
Razimus,

Welcome back my friend...

It's been so long...

How is your website? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Barack? Huh?

Yes it seems Skull&Bones through Kerry have "endorsed" him...

Yes it seems The Masons through Ted Kennedy have "endorsed" him...

And his speech at "St. Lucifer College" indicates the Satanists, Lucerfarians and The Romans (Italians) and The Zionists (Super Zionist Jews (whatever they really are...)) have given the "green light" for Obama to be president.

I find it "odd" people like you and "TheSadOne" have "such predictive powers" for the "divining the future"...

I'm into "the paranormal" perhaps you too would let me test you and study you... /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

Crazy "social genetic" theories are out there... That men of african and caucasian heritage (what caucasian heritage is "unknown") are "super evil people". We don't believe it the same for women of african and western european heritage. But "some" might be evil.

So if you are an "evil organization" and your choice is a "evil (mind controlled programmed bi d&s s&m) woman" or a "mixed heritage evil man"...

I think they would go with the man...

Women are so "emotional and feeling based" and there is that whole "maternal" thing...

I don't think "they like women" at all...



TheCigMan
 
Back
Top