Time travelling in the informational "dimension"

D

decibelus

Temporal Novice
Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

Well,I think that the proceses in the universe are "preestablished".Let me explain:given a starting situation ("zero moment") if we know all factors involved,we can predict,in fact know for sure how the situation will evolve at any time (of course,allien factors excluded) and how the situation got to that zero moment and its status at any previous moment.(Example(grosso modo): the situation in a pool game,once the white ball hit)(of course "in the real life" the interactions are infinitely more complex, but if we could have the capability to input and process all of them we could know how things were or will be at any particular moment...)
Can we? Well it`s possible that intuition and profecy work this way, of course refering to the subject`s area of interest...How does the brain get and process those informations?That I don`t know (yet I have some unfinished ideas)
Another "dayly" backwards(grossier) informational travel is, of course the recalling (memory)
happy.gif


------------------
decibelus
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

decibelus, your english is better than mine! Tell you the truth, I'm based on a dictionary, without it I can imagine the big mess. Your explanations are quite accurate! When you find out what you said was good is by looking at results, in this case replies. You were describing characteristics of current moments and relation with effects to both directions (time). Let's say the brain has the power to "pre-elaborate". There's a probability about wormholes, capable of absorbing and light speed to accelerate. My question is: Is it true that wormholes are for the past, and light speed for the future? That's my limit because I don't possess the knowledge, but I'm sure I'll be helpful if I team up with an expert. Just like the way we're doing now, thanks! When this is achieved the next step will be testing. You also were asking about a possible interaction between two subjects from a different time. Simple like you said for now only future is possible, that's out of the question no doubt about it. The past seems to interact too. This is when you realize that future depends on the past as an starting point from zero. Able to touch the past...? only together we might get to better conclusions. I'm telling you, the answer is missing, but is there somewhere. On a walking state we are in motion, if we do it backwards just exactly as you proceeded able to reach the bigining position. That should be the process of such machine. The opportunity of having visualization is an advantage to be noticed by cameras (interior & exterior look) but only able to record. Then we'll say: Look!!, those are our pre-images!!! Doesn't it sound great?
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

First of all, I`m not an expert and I don`t have "the knowledge"
happy.gif
.
About wormholes... do they exist? I thought they were only a fantasy, a "how about if"... However, such a wormhole could be the proximity of a blackhole, where all processes MAY(incertitude but possibility) be ACCELERATED so a "jump" in "time" would be possible, but in the future not in the past...
Concerning travelling in the past, I don`t think it`s possible:we could not reverse the surrounding`s interactions by isolating the subject because the subject has been very part itself of those interactions (Example: you can not reverse a pool game to its start if you isolate a ball!)
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

Rectification wormhole-blackhole: the jump in the future would be possible only for an outside subject to an object (lets say starship) wich would exit the blackhole`s proximity (because the "time" of the ship would flow faster than that of the subject).Wouldn`t it be nice if we could enter a blakhole`s proximity to solve a problem and get out with the answer "faster" than otherwise?
happy.gif

Observation: we cannot go back in time but we could travel through (a "frozen", standing still) present - if our "time" (inside processes) would flow much faster than the surrounding`s "time".
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

My friend! Please read again my post. On any circumstances I did say you were an expert. The word "IF" says it all. I could make mistakes too, and gladly welcome them for a chance of learning. If you discredit any of my statements I'll will analyze them. Now, about isolating objects from actions: Suppose the traveler takes it, it'll be absent until he gets back with it. In case of someone else from outside it'll be present until the moment is taken. Please reply your comments, and please feel free to read any of my posts as I'll read yours. Although I'm not old. Glad to be with someone, thanks!
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

Excuse me but I didn't quite understand (English) what you wrote from "Supose the traveler...". Please refraze or be more specific.Thanks.
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

Well, as you know "traveler" means someone going from one point to the other, right? On this case this traveler is the person having the experience of going through time (back and forth) with the "possibility" of success. This traveler is the one taking the ball or whatever is at the place. Once you take something, it can be replace for another thing (buying same ball but another one), but NOT for the same one taken (same ball). Of course, otherwise you (the one at the place) "or" that one (traveler) returns it. Please tell me "if" you understood, maybe later I could explain more clear. "This is without insulting": if you're having problems with this "language" I suggest you get a "dictionary".
 
RE: Time travelling in the informational \"dimension\"

decibelus, I see now your point, better late than ever. Suppose instead of supose. Thank you, but didn't I say "your english is better than mine" Least I understand what everybody tells me, no need to "repeat" so many times. As I said before I cought the WRONG IMPRESSION.
 
Back
Top