Time Travelers Confuse Archelogists

wa1ex

wa1ex

Temporal Navigator
So apparently they open this 400 year old tomb said
to have been from the Ming Dynasty....

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_3122542.html?menu=news.quirkies

And they found a swiss watch in it....(apparently the tomb was untouched)

If you do see this from another site the source is on Ananova which from what i have seen in
the past is not really 100% accurate findings /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

This was for entertainment purposes only....
 
clockph1.jpg


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1096959/Mystery-century-old-Swiss-watch-discovered-ancient-tomb-sealed-400-years.html
 
Hahahaha funny as all the usual TTers. fakers we have had here in the past years,anyhow i still have a bit of hope that someday we will have an interesting story over this forum,so for now i'd rather take a more important nap right now like i have been doing lately because this forum has become so boring with fakers and time travelers impersonators.So long,zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz /ttiforum/images/graemlins/frown.gif
 
"Local experts say they are confused as they believe the tomb had been undisturbed since it was created during the Ming dynasty 400 years ago."

Where's the independent supporting evidence that: (1) the site was undisturbed for 400 years, (2) that the object was a Swiss watch, (3) that the watch wasn't at least 400 year old, (4) that the Swiss didn't make watches 400 years ago and (5) that the watch wasn't proper to the ear of ~1500?

We know, as a matter of fact, that Swiss watchmaking goes back to at least 1500.

In other words, absent any other evidence, where's the mystery?
 
Back
Top