Time travel evidences

S

sunflogun

Temporal Novice
I just came across this page that talks about time travel evidences and they are mind blowing indeed. It's a countdown from 10 to 1, but on number 10 we have a 400 year old miniature Swiss watch, how more obvious can it get?

10 Most Compelling Pieces Of Evidence That Prove Time Travel Exists

spacer.png


 
Apparently, the word "Swiss" is inscribed on the back. If you consider the language(s) spoken by the people of Swizerland, 400 years ago, then it's highly unlikely they would have used the English word "Swiss".

 
Just for the heck of it, I did a search on the "first piece of evidence", but on the archaeological validity of the Si Qing in Shangsi County find on it's own. Every result, at least as far as the 10 pages deep, I bothered to look at, was about the TT story. NO results were returned for the tomb discovery. Maybe, the "entire" story is made up. Does anyone have access to a Chinese archaeological data base?

 
Awesome article. I've read it lefts me amazed! I'd like to know more about that Swiss match, I mean it could be totally fake but still a catchy found. Has anybody analyzed it to tell if it's real or counterfeit? If this would be case it would be a concrete proof that something had happened.

 
OK, so this link you show does someway "prove" that there is something true behind this story. I do believe time travel and superior knowledge is behind all this, how could it be explained otherwise?

 
No one ever showed this to be a "real" watch. A working watch this thin does not exist yet today. Did it come from an even further future? Why is there no information to the "discovery" of the tomb... only about the alleged watch?

 
Wow this is incredible if it were proven to be true!! I hope someone could clarify this if it's true or just another time travel hoax. It would be really disappointing if it were fake. Although as what Gpa said, that watch doesn't exist during the present time... so it would be waaaay cool if it was from the further future!

 
No one ever showed this to be a "real" watch. A working watch this thin does not exist yet today. Did it come from an even further future? Why is there no information to the "discovery" of the tomb... only about the alleged watch?
Click to expand...
All those are good questions and I really don't have an answer to them. I don't think it's a real watch, just a representation of a watch. Either cases, it's an evidence that in the past knowledge of common watches and Swiss existed, so that's also a proof.

 
Either cases, it's an evidence that in the past knowledge of common watches and Swiss existed, so that's also a proof.
Click to expand...
Proof of what? If the watch is fake. If the story is a hoax. If the alleged tomb and Si Qing don't actually exist, (I can't find any evidence it or he does exist.) . Then the only proof is, the whole story is not real. I can't see why anyone twists things into showing something they are not.A. The watch is not real.

B. But it says Swiss on the back so that proves they knew about Swiss in the past. It looks like a common watch does today, so they knew about common watches.

A. The tomb is not real. (as far as I can determine)

B. ???

A. The story is false, fake, a hoax, not true, made up, etc.

B. Still, you never know.

 
an interesting read, first time I've heard of this really and I can't help but feel its a prank that the watch was somehow sneaked in and then found. If this is a time travel thing, then its a prank or something to mess with our heads which don't seem likely.

 
Proof of what? If the watch is fake. If the story is a hoax. If the alleged tomb and Si Qing don't actually exist, (I can't find any evidence it or he does exist.) . Then the only proof is, the whole story is not real. I can't see why anyone twists things into showing something they are not.A. The watch is not real.B. But it says Swiss on the back so that proves they knew about Swiss in the past. It looks like a common watch does today, so they knew about common watches.

A. The tomb is not real. (as far as I can determine)

B. ???

A. The story is false, fake, a hoax, not true, made up, etc.

B. Still, you never know.
Click to expand...
Well, you can be right, it can be a well made hoax, like you say you looked up for the tomb and didn't find it. I do not have the knowledge to say if it's true or not, I just wonder why someone would make up something like this.

 
To me it looks more like a ring-sized replica watch, and someone in the comments of that second post points out that the hands are set to 10 past 10 which is a traditional display for advertising and photos. Perhaps someone who was exploring the tomb had it on their person and dropped it without saying anything...?

 
The small watch in the tomb has 69000 search results when you google it in Chinese, which I just did. paste "小瑞士手表在上思县找到了" into google and you're off to either the truth or one helluva coverup...

and the first page of results has a link to:

http://history.gmw.cn/2014-05/27/content_11439064.htm

Where they explain it is actually a ring from a groundskeeper which was lost and fell into the dig while it was occuring...

 
I just came across this page that talks about time travel evidences and they are mind blowing indeed. It's a countdown from 10 to 1, but on number 10 we have a 400 year old miniature Swiss watch, how more obvious can it get?10 Most Compelling Pieces Of Evidence That Prove Time Travel Exists
Click to expand...
Yeah. If you look back in the thread archive six or seven years you'll find that this was discussed at length. Pretty weak. Especially when the only references anywhere to this Earth shattering archeological "find" is the original article (which you don't have above) and nary a word thereafter.The original article references Jiang Yanyu former curator of the Guangxi Museum as the discoverer. The museum does exist. Not a word about this Nobel prize in archeology class discovery anywhere on its website. The only reference to Jiang Yanyu on the Internet? Yup - the watch. The curator (rather, former curator) of a major museum of natural history in a major country and not a word about him on the Internet anywhere - except for the watch. Oh, yeah. A film crew was apparently there filming a documentary when this occurred. Have you seen the documentary anywhere?

We went over all of this years ago and nothing has changed. No curator, no watch, no documentary, no Nobel prize and no reference to the watch since December 18, 2008 other than references taken directly from Cher Thornhill's original article in the UK tabloid Daily Mail.

Here's the original article from 2008: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1096959/Mystery-century-old-Swiss-watch-discovered-ancient-tomb-sealed-400-years.html

Here's the museum's website: http://www.gxmuseum.com/ (It's in Chinese so you'll probably have to use Bing or another translator to read it.)

 
Well, you can be right, it can be a well made hoax, like you say you looked up for the tomb and didn't find it. I do not have the knowledge to say if it's true or not, I just wonder why someone would make up something like this.
Click to expand...
You're on an alt-sci time travel forum and you're surprised, in abject wonderment - baffled no less - that someone would make up a fantastic story and have it printed in a British tabloid (The Daily Mail)?Lissen up, son. I have this bridge, see. It's for sale, see. And for you, and you alone, I'm going to make such a deal...

 
Back
Top