Time Schematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Well I have seen so many diagrams on this Subject! who makes up all of this?
7.8 hz = earth res Frequency
1200 MFD = EARTH capacitance
Quartz Crystals - help grid link?
Time Grids?
Portals?

I have seen over a dozen sites with the same
stuff in the last few days? does any of this work? or is it all hot-air "PIPE DREAMS"?

I have been a sound engineer for 10 years
and many of these so called time circuts
seem the same as my x-over designs but with a pot and some power added to the circut.

I will try and make my own device as i have in the past experienced some weird things
in magnetic phaseing!

I have done some real HIGH POWER phasing
designs and that had affect on my mind like i was in another world, were talking 2000+
watts with a variable signal generater
with multiple transducers - but no i did not
see the future or past just some weird in body effects! so i think the phasing has some part in all of this tiume travel! if anyone
can help me a bit more i will be glad to take
any information! well thats all 4 now..

^The^ ^Spaceman^
 
Hey....I completly agree.At present 80% of the schematics for time travel seem to make no sense.I know little of magnetic phasing although what I have read makes a lot of sense.Iam at present trying to form a group of individuals who are prepared to put their theorys into practice including myself.If you are interested email me at [email protected] or reply here.
cheers Rftt
 
I completely agree with your perception that there are 'so many' time machines out there. All the makes and models! It is, almost certainly a great hoax when, even just one machine would probably be the most remarkable invention ever devised by mankind!
 
Here's a reply to SpaceMan...

On an electronic level, has anyone thought of time being the inverse of frequency? And how do you get specific frequencies in an oscillator? Well, you start out with an active device (transistor amplifier, let's say) and add feedback from the output to the input. The rate of feedback is usually governed by capacitance and resistance. That determines your frequency in an oscillator, right?? Well, what if one of those components had a negative value? Like, let's say, the resistor? A resistor having negative resistance. Your formula for determining frequency would then yeild a minus value. And what do you get when you invert frequency? Time! So, taking something that exhibits negative resistance, like, say the unijunction transistor or tunnel diode and use that as your negative resistive component. Sounds pretty weird but that is your basic electronics and basic math. Any comments???
 
A resistor is used to control the charge and discharge of the capacitor it can not have a negative value. If you replace the resistor with a diode you would not have a oscillator circuit.

How do you get time from an inverted frequency?
 
From equation. Time = 1/freq. The inverse, of course, is true: Freq = 1/time. A 1 MHz sine wave will take 1 usec of time to complete from beginning to end.

As for the diode, I'm not talking about just any ol' ge or si pn junction, here. A tunnel diode has, among other things, a property of negative resistance. So, this is really a mathematical concept. In formula, for f = 1/2*PI*RC*sqrt2n, for any negative value of any of the variables, your answer is going to be negative. What I am thinking about is time moving backwards. In mathematical formula only, it looks like it could work. What would an oscillator look like generating a negative frequency (backwards time)? Maybe (and I jest, here) it would not appear to be running, because if it went 'back in time', then its final stop would be just before you started it, get it? Maybe I'm not jesting, after all. Anyway, I fully understand what you are saying, but if that negative component could be utilized in this way, we just may have something...
 
So post a circuit description for those of us who know nothing about math
happy.gif
 
If you could produce |time| with such a circut, my guess is that to produce a measurable amount of it you would have to feed a large amount of power INTO the circut. You are talking about transforming frequency into time so something tangable (frequency/power) would have to "vanish" and be traded for something intangible (time).

Such a real effect could have gone unnoticed if it turns out that it takes several megawatts of power disapation to supply just a few milliseconds of local time rate shift. The power consumption problem might be averted by using static vs magnetic fields.
 
chuckk:

In your equation " time = 1/freq " what does frequency represent.

How do you define negative resistance? A diode of any kind in your circuit would fail to generate a frequeny positive or negative.
 
Now we're talking! However,I'm not so much talking about transforming frequency into time because, in this sense, they are virtually interchangable. Frequency, in literal terms, is how often a certain event occurs per a given time period (How many times does your job pay you in a month?). Time, or, more specifically, time periods, then, is a measurement between two sequential events. However, in electronic terms, frequency is the rate of a sine wave, where, graphically speaking, a horizontal line (with a leftmost zero starting point) represents time and an intersecting vertical line represents voltages. Those points above the time line represent positive (+) volts and those below represent negative (-) volts. Over a period of time, a sine wave will "start (that is, indicate voltage levels)" at the zero point, curve up to a maximum level, slowly decrease its positive voltage values, hit zero and cross the line into the negative voltage area, reach a peak there and slowly climb back and stop at the zero point again. This is one cycle. If it does this in one second, it's 1 Hz. If it does this 1,000,000 times in one second, it's 1 MHz. This is the frequency. In this example, one million is the frequency - one second is the time. Can't have one without the other. This is what is meant by "time = 1/freq". As for the negative resistance/tunnel diode, yes, TIme Master, a diode subbed for a resistor can't assist the cap into telling it when to discharge. It's just that it had this marvelous property that's just screaming for some exotic application. In the service notes for the tunnel diode, ultra-simple oscillator circuits are shown that utilize just a couple of components! Apparently, this negative resistance thing goes beyond connectivity. Think of a resistor whose value starts at a normal value (say, 47 K) and starts going down. Once it gets to zero, you figure game's over and now its just a piece of wire (not counting the wire's minute DC resistance). Well, the resistance just keeps on going, way past Zero! It behaves, by virtue of high-speed tunnelling of electrons, as if it were some kind of superconductor and has no resistance, whatsoever. Resistance is said to be 'negative' because of its energetic conducting ability. This is what I'm talking about. The property. The diode was exciting not because it was a diode (which won't work) but because of the property, which, in some way, shape or form, must be able to be used all by itself.
And Shadow, I like your thoughts in this subject. Yes, to send something backward in time takes some amount of power, which must be efficiently traded. Have you read of Nicola Tesla?
And Abe...stay tuned, but I don't quite think we'll be able to rush down to our local Radio Shack and buy a bagful of garden-variety parts so we can go back and clean up on last week's lotto. Just maybe, the main component hasn't been developed, yet. But maybe it has.
 
Back
Top