the time has come...request for instruction

Ellis, however, remains sceptical. Many experiments have looked for particles travelling faster than light speed in the past and have come up empty-handed, he says. Most troubling for OPERA is a separate analysis of a pulse of neutrinos from a nearby supernova known as 1987a. If the speeds seen by OPERA were achievable by all neutrinos, then the pulse from the supernova would have shown up years earlier than the exploding star's flash of light; instead, they arrived within hours of each other. "It's difficult to reconcile with what OPERA is seeing," Ellis says.

Data can be passed with neutrinos.

Source material to justify this statement?
 
Source material to justify this statement?

"The equipment to send neutrino messages is still wildly expensive. The researchers who sent the "Neutrino" message used a particle accelerator at Fermilab with a 2.5-mile-circumference track and the 5-ton particle detector named MINERvA. To signal the message, the scientists used binary code, with a group of neutrinos fired corresponding to a 1 and no neutrinos fired corresponding to a 0. Even MINERvA can only detect about one in 10 billion neutrinos, so the particles had to be fired in very large numbers to register.

Because the equipment is so expensive, actual communication with neutrinos is still a long way off. Still, the authors note that the particles are barely affected by gravity and not affected at all by magnetism; eventually, they could provide a stable alternative to the electromagnetic waves we use now. "

Source:
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/03/neutrinos-shot-through-780-feet-of-stone-spell-out-their-name.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss
 
Back
Top