RainmanTime
Super Moderator
The Irony of Titor\'s CIVIL War
As if the term "CIVIL war" was not ironic enough, there is an added twist of irony for those who seriously believe, as Boomer would wish you to believe, that the USA is the one teetering ever so close to civil war. It is why I continue to find "Titor's" predictions utterly laughable, and why I am also so willing to laugh at those who do take it seriously.
The sheer volume of objective evidence available to us today makes the case for the exact OPPOSITE of the situation of what Titor told in his stories. What I mean by this can be understood by comparing and contrasting two societies that are prevalant in the drama being played out on the world stage:
1) Western Democratic society (in this case we would chiefly look at the USA, but cannot exclude the others in the Western world)
2) Middle Eastern Arabic and Muslim society (focusing on Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, but not excluding the other major players in this area of the world)
In looking at where these two societies are at this moment in Time, does anyone really believe that the odds are greater that the USA would erupt in civil war rather than a place like (yes) Iraq, or Iran, or even SA? Just the fact that the Shiites and the Sunni Muslims can hardly live together without killing each other would seem to say it is the pan-Arabic Muslim society in the Middle East that is most ripe for "Civil" war (or warS).
If you go with my theory that the John Titor story was a terrorist Psy Op, what would be truly ironic is that one can propose that some radical, funamentalist Islamist who wants to tear down the USA was actually writing about his OWN society that seems perched on the verge of a pan-Arabic civil war.
Now THAT is one tasty bowl of Ironic Chowder, isn't it???!! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif
RMT
As if the term "CIVIL war" was not ironic enough, there is an added twist of irony for those who seriously believe, as Boomer would wish you to believe, that the USA is the one teetering ever so close to civil war. It is why I continue to find "Titor's" predictions utterly laughable, and why I am also so willing to laugh at those who do take it seriously.
The sheer volume of objective evidence available to us today makes the case for the exact OPPOSITE of the situation of what Titor told in his stories. What I mean by this can be understood by comparing and contrasting two societies that are prevalant in the drama being played out on the world stage:
1) Western Democratic society (in this case we would chiefly look at the USA, but cannot exclude the others in the Western world)
2) Middle Eastern Arabic and Muslim society (focusing on Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, but not excluding the other major players in this area of the world)
In looking at where these two societies are at this moment in Time, does anyone really believe that the odds are greater that the USA would erupt in civil war rather than a place like (yes) Iraq, or Iran, or even SA? Just the fact that the Shiites and the Sunni Muslims can hardly live together without killing each other would seem to say it is the pan-Arabic Muslim society in the Middle East that is most ripe for "Civil" war (or warS).
If you go with my theory that the John Titor story was a terrorist Psy Op, what would be truly ironic is that one can propose that some radical, funamentalist Islamist who wants to tear down the USA was actually writing about his OWN society that seems perched on the verge of a pan-Arabic civil war.
Now THAT is one tasty bowl of Ironic Chowder, isn't it???!! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/yum.gif
RMT