The Countdown Begins...

RainmanTime

RainmanTime

Super Moderator
Well,

Now that Bruce2047 has been totally humiliated, the clock is already ticking for when we can expect the "next character" in someone's endless RPG to make his/her appearance.

It is now Monday, October 23, 2006 at 18:30 Pacific Daylight Time. I would guess that "they" won't be able to restrain themselves for more than one week before their next character appears. And THAT would take a lot of patience on "their" part.

RMT
 
Oh, was I humiliated? Interesting, I don't feel humiliated. I have a feeling I will be discussed long after I leave. Anyway it started snowing today so I've started packing for my trip back. I would say that it has been nice, but it hasn't. I just stoped by to logout from the site on this computer. Farewell
 
I personally was not posting to humiliate Bruce.
I just seek the truth.
I think a real time traveler would understand skeptisism and not
be angry and wish the people were dead when they don't believe him.
I put myself in the time travelers place and think how I would respond.
He should stand back and look at his own pictures and the multimeter and see how it
looks to us. It is just ridiculous that the picture he showed would be a handheld
to a time machine when it looks just like a multimeter.

When you face a real time traveler and you say "No sorry I don't believe you.'
Would he really say "The world is better off without you people I hope you all die."
I know it is not what I would say. What kind of people have been hired for this job if
that were true? That is just a terrible response....from anyone.
 
Oh, was I humiliated? Interesting, I don't feel humiliated.
Click to expand...
Then you either weren't paying attention, or you know even less about science than you insinuated.

I have not even begun to tap into your BS. Yet you conveniently ignore the digital photo option, which would give you more credibility. What is the logical conclusion we should come to for why you refuse to provide this form of evidence?

And you also conveniently avoid answering the questions about divergence. Saying you don't understand how divergence is measured (THE PRIMARY parameter for guiding your journey) is precisely equivalent to a pilot stating he does not know how lift is generated, how it is measured, or how much he needs to stay airborne. Yet you cling to your ignorance like a child who had his hand caught in the cookie jar.

Should I continue? I can, you know...

ANY operating manual for a piece of complex machinery will most certainly have a tutorial on the BASICS related to what that machine can measure and what it can control. For example, let's just use the multimeter you tried to pass off: Did you know that a multimeter manual will describe "high impedance voltage dividers" and how this principle is used to actually measure in-circuit voltages while minimizing the impact on the circuit being measured?

A pilot knows that Angle Of Attack is the primary airmass measurement made by his airplane, and displayed for his use, that will keep him/her aloft.

And yet you know nothing about how divergence is measured. That is pretty sad, wouldn't you say? What would happen if your "divergence control circuit" malfunctioned while on a trip... would you be stuck forever in that time? Or is it possible there are multiply redundant "divergence control circuits"? And if there are, wouldn't you want to know how multiply-redundant sensors were "voted"?

RMT
 
I hope that digital mutimeter gets you back to the future. If not I know Doc Brown and Marty McFly, they can help you with a Delorean.
 
Bruce,

I have a feeling I will be discussed long after I leave.
Click to expand...

You have "feelings" about our future, but your relative past with respect to your final destination/point of origin? You mean to tell us that you never checked the Internet to see if you were discussed at all after you slinked away? I mean, according to your own story your "group" has to check the Internet for your "help page" to see if anyone in the past has left a "I wanna go home but I'm broke down in Philly circa 2006" message - and you never checked on yourself?

I don't "feel" that that's how it would go. I do "feel" that by next week people will have to scratch their head and think deep just to remember your handle. They might remember the name of their favorite pet snail. They might remember "that guy" with a multimeter aka "time machine" thingy...and have a chuckle over it. But talk about and remember you...? Nah.

On the other hand you could be right. You might be talked about long after you leave. But the person who would be talking about you would be you.
 
Pamela,
Excellent post. I was thinking along the same lines as you. I never really felt any animosity towards Bruce, and wish him the best of luck. It is to bad that he will be gone, because he did seem to have alot of knowledge regarding plants.

I do have a grudging respect for that skill, since I have tried to utilize my "green thumb" and realized my greatest ability in growing any type of plant, is with cactus. Easily maintained, even when I forget to water the thing, it hangs in there. All other plants have wilted and passed away for a variety of reasons. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/cry.gif

Regardless of anyones belief in the time traveling claim, it doesnt matter either way in the greater scheme of life...namely how we get along. It doesnt matter from where we hail, we should exhibit considerations of peace, compassion and prosperity for all.

Bruce...I dont know if you will even read this post, but I hope you understand that I "never" laughed at you, nor have any ill feeling towards you what-so-ever. I wish you the best and may life provide you with the love and beauty to which everyone is entitled.

You may have met with some hostility, however, I am hopeful you would understand that it was bound to occur, and par for the course with any claim.

You are not unique with regards to such treatment.

And I am sure you recognize that you would meet with skeptical responses, especially realizing that your proof does appear to be questonable.

Knowing people, you should have known what replies would follow such a posting. You also should be happy that there are people that DO question things placed on the table before them.

Not everyone responds the same way, we all have different personalities, and we ALL experience the good...and bad. Its what we do with them that counts.

We all have the opportunity to learn about ourselves and how we interact with others. All situations are a chance to learn about ourselves, and to recognize the need to build a foundation for evolution/ascension and developing compassion for fellow travelers walking the path we have found ourselves upon.

This includes you, yourself. We all need to learn to "sacrifice" our negative approach to others, regardless of the situation(s)...a lesson in many "religions" ignored.

Jesus, Himself, beaten, tortured and crucified, had the greatest of all reasons to hold a grudge and resentments for those that did these things to Him. However, he "sacrificed" these emotions for forgiveness and asked that they be forgiven, a universal lesson that everyone should learn.

When you return to your world-line, take this with you, an understanding that wherever creation has established itself, Love and forgiveness needs to exist as well.

So do NOT leave with negativity as a companion, but forgive those who have trespassed against you, and travel the time-lines with an (en)lightened heart.

<font color="blue">"May The Lord bless you, keep you safe; May the Lord's face shine upon you,
and be gracious upon you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon you, and give
you peace." (Numbers 6:24-26)
[/COLOR]
 
OvrLrd,

I like and respect you, my friend, but please don't apologize to Bruce on my behalf. I've posted nothing that he shouldn't have expected or that I should be sorry for.

This is a time travel forum on the Internet. If our "time traveling" friend wanted absolute and unquestioned belief he should have tried His Holiness, the Dali Lama of Tibet rather than the Time Travel Institute.

But not to worry. Bruce will be back (again) with yet another IP, handle and story.
 
I like and respect you, my friend, but please don't apologize to Bruce on my behalf.
Click to expand...
Not to worry, Darby. If anything he may have been apologizing for ME! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif I know there are some around here who think I am "nasty"... which is why I constantly point out that I am more than civil until the TT hoaxer decides to "draw first" when I ask questions or make points that they don't wish to answer. Until that point, sarcasm is my "schtick". And if someone finds sarcasm "nasty" then all they need to do is answer the freaking questions!


RMT
 
It was a general statement, not really apologizing for any ONE person in particular, or any "particular" ,identified, group, either.

There is enough negative energy floating around, I felt the need to try and plug in some positive energy...nothing more, nothing less.

I certainly had no intention(s) of offending anyone.

The statement has been removed.

I've posted nothing that he shouldn't have expected or that I should be sorry for.
Click to expand...

Never said you or anyone in particular did...and I believe that I also addressed that subject, regarding any replies he may not have liked.
 
some very interesting viewing.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

And "things will never be the same" in a very literal sense once Science has been reconciled with Spirituality. In my own opinion, this can and will be brought about when we learn that virtually ALL of our ancient scriptures which "define" our various religious beliefs, will be shown to be consistent with the SCIENCE which allowed Massive SpaceTime Travelers to visit us, thereby creating the stories that shaped all world religious (really spiritual) thought. Contact with "aliens" and understanding who/what they are will help us forever cement not only the Science of Massive SpaceTime, but how our non-bodies (minds, souls, spirits) fit into that scientific picture. Again, just my opinions, but it seems almost obvious that "disclosure" as some have called it would certainly be able to be aligned with a QUANTUM LEAP in our human evolution. In fact, it would be hard to prevent such a quantum leap once that kind of INFORMATION (i.e. how Science reconciles with Spirituality on a universal level) is available to all.

These are the vast and numerous "realizations" that we will come upon in the next 6 years. If you thought technology advancement was fast from 1950s until now, we will FAR exceed that kind of multiplication of knowledge/information in the next 6 years. For some, it can/will be like drinking from a fire hose... it will be too much. Once again, just my opinions.


RMT
 
RMT:

These are the vast and numerous "realizations" that we will come upon in the next 6 years. If you thought technology advancement was fast from 1950s until now, we will FAR exceed that kind of multiplication of knowledge/information in the next 6 years. For some, it can/will be like drinking from a fire hose... it will be too much. Once again, just my opinions.
Click to expand...

I agree, I can already see this in software development where the hardware is way ahead of the
software.

Software Must More Than Keep Up with Hardware but I can already see this is not the case.

A rule of thumb is that every time chip performance doubles, the software needed to tap into this increased performance quadruples. And if, according to Moore's First Law, chip performance makes that leap about every two years, then the amount of code has to double almost annually.

Unfortunately, that's just not happening. Industry analyst VDC estimates that the amount of code being produced in one of the best tech industries, telecommunications, is growing at only half that rate — that shortfall helping to explain why the average software project in telecom is now six months behind, and getting worse.

Look around and you can see the same problem almost everywhere. Today's average mobile phone has 2 million lines of code — by 2010 it will have 10 million. The amount of code in the average new TV doubles, like Moore's Law, every 24 months. And this year's model cars will average 35 million lines of code — a number that will jump to 100 million by 2010.
Click to expand...

source:
http://tombomb.typepad.com/tombomb/2006/10/the_last_days_o.html
 
Hi wa1ex,
Software Must More Than Keep Up with Hardware but I can already see this is not the case.
Click to expand...
This is an excellent observation, and it could easily become a topic of its own in the "Science" area of the forum. Let me just point out that there ARE tools in existence that can drastically reduce software coding time (essentially allowing one to go from an integrated design of HW+SW to actual code to run on the target platform without having to have humans manually code it). The tool that is most often used for this purpose in Aerospace is the MATLAB/Simulink toolset. This is the tool that I use to develop not only advanced control laws that fly the target aerospace vehicle, but I can also model the vehicle and the aerodynamic environment COMPLETELY within this toolset. This allows me a rapid cycle of design-test-validate in my simulation environment. Once I am satisfied that the design is "ready for prime time" we simply run the control law parts of the model through an automatic C++ code generator. Viola! The code is ready to run on any target processor which supports a C++ compiler.

Just like levers and pulleys were tools developed by the ancients to do "more with less" so tool development will continue to be the enabling technology into the future.

RMT
 
Back
Top