TheCigSmokingMan
Rift Surfer
The Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006 is poised to be voted on by the lame duck Congress. That intends to "legalize" the domestic surveillance of the NSA which of course is ILLEGAL.
Will it pass?
No.
TheCigMan
------------------------
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy
The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns eavesdropping by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) without court oversight as required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Under an ongoing and formerly secret program, often referred to as the "Terrorist Surveillance Program",[1] certain telephone calls are monitored without obtaining a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court either in advance or retroactively within three days as required by FISA.
-----------------------
Bush presses domestic surveillance bill as Democrats balk
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/11/bush-presses-domestic-surveillance.php
[JURIST] The Bush administration and Democrats on Capitol Hill appear likely to clash over legislation authorizing domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] of suspected terrorists when the lame-duck Congress returns to Washington next week. During a Rose Garden appearance following a Cabinet meeting Thursday, President Bush urged lawmakers [transcript] to pass the Terrorist Surveillance Act, which he called an "important priority in the war on terror." The House version of the bill, which was passed in September [JURIST report], would allow warrantless surveillance for fixed periods following an "armed attack" or a "terrorist attack," or if the president perceives an "imminent threat of attack," with indefinite extensions pending congressional and court oversight.
Prospects for passage of a similar bill [summary] in the Senate are uncertain at best. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official website], in line to become chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in the new Congress was quoted in Friday's New York Times as saying that the Bush administration "first hid its domestic spying program from Congress and Americans for years, and when it was discovered, has ducked and weaved on its legal justifications." Although he called monitoring suspected terrorists "essential," Leahy said such surveillance "needs to be done lawfully and with adequate checks and balances to prevent abuses." Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [JURIST news archive], the current Judiciary chairman, told the Times he was "not sure exactly how all that is going to work out" because of the "seismic change" in the Senate following Tuesday's elections.
Will it pass?
No.
TheCigMan
------------------------
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy
The NSA warrantless surveillance controversy concerns eavesdropping by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) without court oversight as required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Under an ongoing and formerly secret program, often referred to as the "Terrorist Surveillance Program",[1] certain telephone calls are monitored without obtaining a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court either in advance or retroactively within three days as required by FISA.
-----------------------
Bush presses domestic surveillance bill as Democrats balk
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/11/bush-presses-domestic-surveillance.php
[JURIST] The Bush administration and Democrats on Capitol Hill appear likely to clash over legislation authorizing domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] of suspected terrorists when the lame-duck Congress returns to Washington next week. During a Rose Garden appearance following a Cabinet meeting Thursday, President Bush urged lawmakers [transcript] to pass the Terrorist Surveillance Act, which he called an "important priority in the war on terror." The House version of the bill, which was passed in September [JURIST report], would allow warrantless surveillance for fixed periods following an "armed attack" or a "terrorist attack," or if the president perceives an "imminent threat of attack," with indefinite extensions pending congressional and court oversight.
Prospects for passage of a similar bill [summary] in the Senate are uncertain at best. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official website], in line to become chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in the new Congress was quoted in Friday's New York Times as saying that the Bush administration "first hid its domestic spying program from Congress and Americans for years, and when it was discovered, has ducked and weaved on its legal justifications." Although he called monitoring suspected terrorists "essential," Leahy said such surveillance "needs to be done lawfully and with adequate checks and balances to prevent abuses." Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) [JURIST news archive], the current Judiciary chairman, told the Times he was "not sure exactly how all that is going to work out" because of the "seismic change" in the Senate following Tuesday's elections.