You are partly right.Reminds me of a singularity diagram
At first glance, it looks like output from a 360 degree scintillation detector array for a low(ish) energy particle collision, with measurements and reference points added. At second glance, I have absolutely no idea. What is it?After trying to post a couple of times and seeing the number of postings increase but not the pages...I assume it is limited to 11 pages.
Any thoughts?
View attachment 1832
Come on now (again), if you "started" this then you know that you already answered the question about the diagram in 2001. Right?After trying to post a couple of times and seeing the number of postings increase but not the pages...I assume it is limited to 11 pages.
Any thoughts?
You and I even discussed the diagram in detail.Come on now (again), if you "started" this then you know that you already answered the question about the diagram in 2001. Right?
(Are you sure you've actually read the posts from Topics Limited to, Parallel Universes, I am from 2036, etc?)
I'm going to give the OP a bit of time to respond to my posts. But I will give you an answer if (s)he can't or won't.At first glance, it looks like output from a 360 degree scintillation detector array for a low(ish) energy particle collision, with measurements and reference points added. At second glance, I have absolutely no idea. What is it?
You can't give a single answer. Your knowledge of this story and the reasons for the origin of this story, as well as the design of the time machine, is zero.I'm going to give the OP a bit of time to respond to my posts. But I will give you an answer if (s)he can't or won't.
Bingo! Where's the bottom half with the writing?Where's the bottom half with the writing
Bingo! Where's the bottom half with the writing?
The bottom half is missing. Now we have a conundrum. When Titor/TT0 originally posted the above graphic he posted it without the bottom half. It was The Book group that included the graphic in The Book with the bottom half attached . The bottom half, of course, has the legend to the numbered points in the graphic.
Now, based on the posts, there's no easy explanation as to why Titor/TT0 didn't include the legend when he posted the graphic. The answer isn't found in any of the posts. The answer came directly from Ben Z to Rick Donaldson and me via email which we posted on Anomalies.net. Ben said The Book group made it up. "Momma" Kay Titor didn't give them any instructions nor did Larry Haber give them any instructions. They simply made up the legend and added it to the graphic. Neither "Momma" Kay nor Larry Haber objected. As Ben told us, The Book group was led to believe the entire story was an online role playing game and their job was to add props (the graphics) and The Book.
This is a separate image (without description of elements)Where's the bottom half with the writing
There are separate images (diagrams), and there is a full page on which the elements under the image are indicated.Where's the bottom half with the writing
This diagram shows the gravitational fields created by two electron singularities. This diagram shows the basis for movement into the future and the past. Since the center of the electron singularities is shifted, the diagram shows the movement of the time machine into the future or the past, depending on the turn of the diagram.View attachment 1939Alrighty all I could find is the mislabeled one. #2 and #3 are off.
Your turn, @Time travel_O
sureI renamed this thread so others don't confuse it for the original when trying to search for it:
After trying to post a couple of times and seeing the number of postings increase but not the pages...I assume it is limited to 11 pages.
Any thoughts?
- TimeTravel_01
- Replies: 403
- Forum: Original Threads
This diagram shows the gravitational fields created by two electron singularities. This diagram shows the basis for movement into the future and the past. Since the center of the electron singularities is shifted, the diagram shows the movement of the time machine into the future or the past, depending on the turn of the diagram.
They are called electron singularities only because - to control these singularities electrons are used, which must be injected into the field of the singularity kerr in order to control its mass and direction of rotation. That's why they're electrons.Not sure I'm on board with calling them "electron singularities" yet.
Can we talk about this further? I updated one of my older threads with my actual take on the diagram, but as this one continues...
@Time travel_O can you please:
1) Explain what an electron singularity means vs a micro singularity
2) Describe what the geodesic would be for an electron singularity
3) Walk us through why the turn of the diagram changes anything (if at all)