G
Guest
This is just a theory based on some thoughts I had. I already typed it, but lost it because I do not have a password for my username, so it didn't let me post with since I had preregistered the name I entered. Said to use the back button, where upon doing so my text was gone. I will try to post it as close to the original as I can...
Anyways, I do not have much background with time travel. I only recently started thinking a little about it after seeing mention of it on a Stephen Hawking site. Here's the idea...
Suppose that all atoms in the universe are numbered. Each one has its own unique ID number. Any given object could have its atoms catalogued (hypothetically as this would be a huge task) at any given time. (The exact atoms within objects, especially living objects are dynamic.)
Now suppose that we have a potential time traveller. A catalog of all the atoms in the time traveller is taken right before they are to depart. They travel back in time. However now there is a conflict -- many of the atoms catalogued as being in the traveller may (and probably are) located in other places back in time. This would suggest that the same atoms are in two places at once, in the traveller and in something else (i.e. a tree). Now either this is not possible, or the traveller is creating matter as he/she travels backwards.
Again, suppose time travel is possible. Suppose that atoms cannot be in two places at once, and that atoms cannot be created/duplicated. I would think in such a situation, the time traveller would disintegrate as they travelled backwards (as would any 'time machine' they might have). However, if they travelled forwards into time the results could be different. Supposing that the future is not already laid out, or has happened, then atoms would not be preallocated or have any guaranteed destination. Then the traveller could travel forwards without conflict. Hypothetically, the traveller could travel back to their starting position from the future when all the atoms in their body were not present anywhere else, and not a millisecond sooner.
Any thoughts, criticisms are gladly accepted. If anyone can find any holes in thie theory, I welcome hearing them. I'm new to this whole thing, and have probably overlooked something somewhere.
Joel
([email protected])
ICQ: 3426951
Anyways, I do not have much background with time travel. I only recently started thinking a little about it after seeing mention of it on a Stephen Hawking site. Here's the idea...
Suppose that all atoms in the universe are numbered. Each one has its own unique ID number. Any given object could have its atoms catalogued (hypothetically as this would be a huge task) at any given time. (The exact atoms within objects, especially living objects are dynamic.)
Now suppose that we have a potential time traveller. A catalog of all the atoms in the time traveller is taken right before they are to depart. They travel back in time. However now there is a conflict -- many of the atoms catalogued as being in the traveller may (and probably are) located in other places back in time. This would suggest that the same atoms are in two places at once, in the traveller and in something else (i.e. a tree). Now either this is not possible, or the traveller is creating matter as he/she travels backwards.
Again, suppose time travel is possible. Suppose that atoms cannot be in two places at once, and that atoms cannot be created/duplicated. I would think in such a situation, the time traveller would disintegrate as they travelled backwards (as would any 'time machine' they might have). However, if they travelled forwards into time the results could be different. Supposing that the future is not already laid out, or has happened, then atoms would not be preallocated or have any guaranteed destination. Then the traveller could travel forwards without conflict. Hypothetically, the traveller could travel back to their starting position from the future when all the atoms in their body were not present anywhere else, and not a millisecond sooner.
Any thoughts, criticisms are gladly accepted. If anyone can find any holes in thie theory, I welcome hearing them. I'm new to this whole thing, and have probably overlooked something somewhere.
Joel
([email protected])
ICQ: 3426951