Seeing and living in parallel universes

Jedi

Temporal Novice
I think this is possible at certain points in time, especially when one has been in a deep sleep. I know sometimes I have woken up and felt as if I am in the wrong place. The mind can take us to a parallel universe where things seem familiar yet are different and when we return, we recall the slight differences.

Some people do this through journeying or astral projection and other times it happens because we need to see alternative ways to solve things or to feel things. Maybe it's a way to help us when we are troubled and our alter ego helps us by allowing us to see an alternate way?

 
It's possible we cross realities daily, or by the hour, or even back and forth in a pattern like the double-helix of DNA. I interpret dreams as nothing more than a manifestation of memories and sensory input (which doesn't stop coming in even when we're asleep) but it's possible that dreams could be disturbed by the crossing of the line causing the feeling you get.

 
This is something I’m messing around with in fiction - using sleep as a vehicle to jump across realities, and then literally living a dream, I suppose. Just a question of whose ;)

I’ve often thought that dreaming was a temporary way to witness a parallel universe. Personally, so many things in my dreams are just slightly off from the way I know them in my waking life. And before I’ve woken up, sometimes there’s this distinct feeling that “I shouldn’t be here.” And then, I’m not. So I think there’s something to it.

 
In dreams we may travel around, and the brain can think we are somewhere else and in some other universe which feels like we belong there but than we wake up in the morning and brought back to the universe we are in. I think that we could be in a another universe at times and also at death we could travel there easily as we don't have a physical body which can stop us from moving around. It will take time to understand this, as even scientists and many researchers have not understood this and may understand it one day.

 
I've thought about this when you have a dream, suddenly wake up and then return to that dream when going to sleep again.

Also when you are in a specific place in a dream (multiple times actually), which you haven't seen before in real life.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In journeying what you can do ( it takes skill and practice) is go back in time to an event and 'alter' things so in effect you are going back in time but only to amend a specific event. It's called rewriting contracts in soul work, so what you do is amend the contract by adding something to it or make your contract more specific.

This has worked in many cases, but access is only granted for certain circumstances and you must also convince the gatekeeper of your intentions and state them. An example would be making a soul contract with someone and saying you would help them throughout their entire life. Then when it comes to it, they become a drug addict and attack you and bankrupt you. So, you go back in time to amend that contract to say you will help them as long as their actions do not halt or harm your own path. By adding those extra words, it can change your life subtly.

 
In journeying what you can do ( it takes skill and practice) is go back in time to an event and 'alter' things so in effect you are going back in time but only to amend a specific event.

According to what reliable source(s)? Can you design a proper experiment such that independent researchers can verify the assertion?

It's called rewriting contracts in soul work

It's call that by whom? Given that they call it by some term how does naming it equate to "its real"?

So what you do is amend the contract by adding something to it or make your contract more specific.

Amend what contract? Who are the parties to the contract and how do their instant needs supersede the needs of the entire population who are not parties to the contract?

This has worked in many cases

Where is the evidence?

Access is only granted for certain circumstances

So practice and skill are not sufficient? Who is this third party that has to grant permission? How do we contact this person?

You must also convince the gatekeeper of your intentions and state them

Gatekeeper? Is this a AD&D game or does it have some relationship with reality? WTF is the Gatekeeper and who appointed him/her as such?

---

This entire line of reasoning boils down to a False Attribution logical fallacy. You're tossing in irrelevant, unqualified, unidentified, biased and otherwise unknown sources to justify your assertions. It might sound nice to you, people who already support your minority positions won't object to the tactic but overall the tactic will fail to convince either the fence sitter or the opponent. They have no impact on the discussion. You're simply preaching to your own choir.

 
Back
Top