RainmanTime
Super Moderator
RainmanTime\'s Maths - For jmpet
jmpet,
Can we leave the pot-shots behind us in this thread? I told you I would begin to explain the more simple aspects of my theory and maths, and that is what I intend to do here. The theory begins with definitions, as should all solid theories. Some defintions are well-known and accepted in science, and others might be disputed. But as long as you refer to these definitions as we move forward, the theory and maths should hold together:
1) Mass - A fictional metric of the force resistance inherent to an object. This metric is thought to be a static (unchanging in Time) measure of a body's inertia which is also thought to be independent of Space. From our empirical measurements of atomic charges and electron quantum states, we know that Mass is anything but static. It is always changing. Science has seen fit (so far) to call this a scalar quantity.
2) Space - Another fictional metric which attempts to define a fixed frame of reference which objects and their motion can be measured with respect to. We know it is fictional because Einstein proved to us that there is NO preferred reference frame, and that all are relative. However, given our world is based upon our human perception, and that is focused on measuring things relative to self, this fictional metric does come in handy, even if it is not 100% accurate. Science calls Space a field, and therefore it has magnitude and direction, so it is a vector.
3) Time - Yet another fictional metric created by mankind as nothing more than a means to be able to track Matter in Motion. Like the other fictional metrics, we used to think Time was fixed and unchangeable, but Einstein again showed us that Time can be dilated...changed. Science again calls this a scalar quantity.
4) Motion - Also Known As (AKA): SpaceTime. This is the first metric we have developed which is not based on static measurements. Rather, it is true to Einstein's GTR in that it defines an integrated relationship between two of our primary metrics described above. We measure Motion as derivatives of Space with respect to Time, usually for some specific body of Mass. Therefore, the "base metric" of motion would be (and is) velocity. Note how velocity is the primary metric that defines levels of kinetic energy. This establishes its importance with respect to any theorized "unified field" of Massive SpaceTime.
5) Matter - I also refer to this as: MassTime. In physics and engineering, this is more commonly known as mass flow rate (m-dot). It is my position that this metric is just as important as SpaceTime, and one can readily see the relative analogy between the two. It is also my position that the concept of Matter, as distinct from Mass, can also help us understand and resolve the difference between "rest mass" and "relativistic mass".
That's enough definitions for now, but there will be more as we go along. But right off the bat I'd like to point out that there should be general agreement that the way we (humans) measure what we think of as "linear time" is actually by measuring Matter in Motion. If Matter is Mass/Time and Motion is Space/Time, some simple math & dimensional analysis will show that what we are really measuring when we track Matter in Motion (Matter/Motion) is: Mass/Space. Another term for this would be mass density. This is something near and dear to Creedo's heart, and a topic I have agreed with him on many occasions. Unfortunately, I have not been successful in getting him to talk in depth about it.
So far, so good? We haven't gotten into any heavy math yet, but that will come in time (pardon the pun). In fact, if you are OK with this so far, I think the next post should begin to describe why the derivative of calculus is so important, and how we can apply the derivative to the definitions above to reach a deeper understanding of established physics... and maybe establish a few "extended" properties of existing physics that we may not have considered before.
RMT
jmpet,
Can we leave the pot-shots behind us in this thread? I told you I would begin to explain the more simple aspects of my theory and maths, and that is what I intend to do here. The theory begins with definitions, as should all solid theories. Some defintions are well-known and accepted in science, and others might be disputed. But as long as you refer to these definitions as we move forward, the theory and maths should hold together:
1) Mass - A fictional metric of the force resistance inherent to an object. This metric is thought to be a static (unchanging in Time) measure of a body's inertia which is also thought to be independent of Space. From our empirical measurements of atomic charges and electron quantum states, we know that Mass is anything but static. It is always changing. Science has seen fit (so far) to call this a scalar quantity.
2) Space - Another fictional metric which attempts to define a fixed frame of reference which objects and their motion can be measured with respect to. We know it is fictional because Einstein proved to us that there is NO preferred reference frame, and that all are relative. However, given our world is based upon our human perception, and that is focused on measuring things relative to self, this fictional metric does come in handy, even if it is not 100% accurate. Science calls Space a field, and therefore it has magnitude and direction, so it is a vector.
3) Time - Yet another fictional metric created by mankind as nothing more than a means to be able to track Matter in Motion. Like the other fictional metrics, we used to think Time was fixed and unchangeable, but Einstein again showed us that Time can be dilated...changed. Science again calls this a scalar quantity.
4) Motion - Also Known As (AKA): SpaceTime. This is the first metric we have developed which is not based on static measurements. Rather, it is true to Einstein's GTR in that it defines an integrated relationship between two of our primary metrics described above. We measure Motion as derivatives of Space with respect to Time, usually for some specific body of Mass. Therefore, the "base metric" of motion would be (and is) velocity. Note how velocity is the primary metric that defines levels of kinetic energy. This establishes its importance with respect to any theorized "unified field" of Massive SpaceTime.
5) Matter - I also refer to this as: MassTime. In physics and engineering, this is more commonly known as mass flow rate (m-dot). It is my position that this metric is just as important as SpaceTime, and one can readily see the relative analogy between the two. It is also my position that the concept of Matter, as distinct from Mass, can also help us understand and resolve the difference between "rest mass" and "relativistic mass".
That's enough definitions for now, but there will be more as we go along. But right off the bat I'd like to point out that there should be general agreement that the way we (humans) measure what we think of as "linear time" is actually by measuring Matter in Motion. If Matter is Mass/Time and Motion is Space/Time, some simple math & dimensional analysis will show that what we are really measuring when we track Matter in Motion (Matter/Motion) is: Mass/Space. Another term for this would be mass density. This is something near and dear to Creedo's heart, and a topic I have agreed with him on many occasions. Unfortunately, I have not been successful in getting him to talk in depth about it.
So far, so good? We haven't gotten into any heavy math yet, but that will come in time (pardon the pun). In fact, if you are OK with this so far, I think the next post should begin to describe why the derivative of calculus is so important, and how we can apply the derivative to the definitions above to reach a deeper understanding of established physics... and maybe establish a few "extended" properties of existing physics that we may not have considered before.
RMT