Parallel Realities

O

One

Temporal Novice
There was a similar post regarding this subject, but discussion about it has seemed to have died off for some time so I wanted to revise it. The subject of parallel realities is fascinating and I have noticed fine details and significant events that seem to change or alter and it appears that only a select few people notice these changes.

My question is do you think this is a natural phenomena that has always occurred, but due to our perception of time these events seem more noticeable?
<font color="#666666"> [/COLOR]
 
I am too young for Dementia.
My eyesight is fine so it could not be Charles Bonnet Syndrome.

I was referring to the Quantum Mechanic Philosophy and the significant changes that seem to be occurring. I agree this makes me sound crazy and maybe that is the case, but after extensive research I have read account after account of individuals experiencing what could be referred to as shifts in reality.

This could just be pure fiction, this could be a sad attempt to make their lives more interesting, or this could be a legitimate phenomena. The sad thing is anything paranormal, supernatural, or unexplainable by science tends to regard the experiencing individual as a person in need of medication.

Perhaps the changes I noticed where the result of my reading too many accounts and specifically looking for changes that may or may not be present. I happen o believe in this phenomena and am not alone.

Plus, I wouldn’t be bragging about my Dementia or faltering eyesight on a forum.
 
I meant no disrespect towards you.
If you are aware of this site, then I'm sure you know that there is intellectual baiting at times, as well, friendly challenges.
It's very hard through a message board to always 'feel intent', or something akin.
If you have experienced what you originally stated, you seem very well spoken and I am sorry for any negative feeling.
I tend to be an eccentric person on many levels so my over active mind has to play out all scenerios - which at times may seem that I miss a/the point entirely, which is not the case necessarily, it's just the choice of expression vs. effective communication.

So to readdress what you've asked, I think anything is possible, and I know here that many skeptics draw a breath stating such, however if you can imagine it, you can calculate it - eventually. Relevance? questionable at times, I'm learning to curb the imagination towards practicality - which is sad in some regards because it means letting go of some possibility.
Quantum mechanics to me is a Holy Grail of sorts. Why?

As children we imagine anything is possible, science inevitably slowly closes the door on this. QM is not only a key, but a series of fabulous and wonderous doors waiting to be opened, though caution is certainly to be had.
What's possible? What's irrational?
When I visualize all these things I digest and dream, I don't tend to form a bias (that includes conspiracies), rather I pose the wonderment of conjecture to myself in the form of what can be held onto rationaly, and what must be let go from the process of not only deduction, but more recently proven logic.

For me, it's not an ego trip, but more importantly a chance to visualize the fantastic.

So - back to your question, sorry - I told you I ramble /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

I've wondered if we each have our 'own' parallel reality many times. It would give sense and meaning more towards the 'I think therefore I am' aspect.
Though just as in synchronicity of 'shared time' - in that context, I imagine you'd be speaking of individual perception divergence? Something perceived that goes outside the norms of majority consensus on an event, or something paticular in the environment?

That goes back to (not color blindness) but individual perception.
How do we not know the colors we take for granted are not different hues to each of us, but yet appear normal for we agree what we both see is "green" or "blue" etc.
All we'd need is the complete range of frequencies to seperate the prism into it's respective measurements.
As long as that occurs and 'shading' is correct then the rest is personal perception.
IE; your "Red" could be my "Blue" etc, but for all intensive purposes of perception, language, and communication that wouldn't matter. It would be something only each of us can know. Unless you can look through another's eyes ^^.
(I realize that there may be ways to analyze that further, but it's an example of personal perception vs. shared for comparison value).

It's interesting. Once again, I apologize.
 
No apology necessary, as you said the computer does not interpret the appropriate emotion.

To think, the ability to communicate with people all over the world, yet sarcasm can not be interpreted. My response was sarcasm, and I apologize for the misleading.

I do look forward to the intellectual debating. furthermore, I agree that our own perception is possibly what defines our reality, therefore, changes with who we are would alter our perception thus making it an alternate reality, perception truly does hold the key to the world in which we live and possibly the worlds that exist outside of what we allow ourselves to experience.

my hope is to truly understand this phenomena and debate its existence and the truth behind this reality we all share.

fascinating subject and one that no matter how much information you gain will continue to amaze.
 
In a very general sense you almost seemed to raise a very important but often overlooked point.
In the schools of thought that predict time travel is 'possible', based upon such things as folding space, or any hypothetical - there is another major point of concern.
Obviously the thought of transitioning an inanimate physical object through time is complex enough, however the ultimate goal one would assume in that context line of progession - would be to as well transition the cognitive senses accordingly.
Would this be automatic, or would this require some sort of metaphorical 'decompression chamber' for the perception?
In some ways we could perhaps draw conclusions from some universal physical laws of motion, but yet another dimension to take into consideration is very intriguing.

What's your take?
 
Back
Top