On timeline corruption:

creedo299

creedo299

Epochal Historian
It was said that there is a severyt three percent divergence in the present current timeline.

There are proof of mathematical table problems with two says.

One that any affiliate connection with said Montauk generic sorts of use, may have diverged the timeline.

2.That due to too many time travelers, the timeline has been diverged.

3.That via an aerospace experts say, here, that the timeline has been enhanced, in some way, via an Earth orbiting satellite, so the timeline, or some parts of the timeline, have been compression enhanced.

4.That as said by the beings through Barbara Marcinack, that the Sirians have shot a memory-awakening beam into our central sun, so awakening many past existences, in standard people here on Earth.

5.That due to a phenomenon, known as Planet X, there is a fractal perception in unit wide realities, due to mass, over gravity and C incoming at length fro Sol, so frequency is increased.

Mathematical Fourier’s would be entailed, as an understanding collection of all variables in a said super computer, which can map spatially.

All entries into this time, by time travelers, would be done in some respects, by modulated instrumentations.
 
I think,

And i may be wrong. But this 73% change in the Timeline, also means that in our line (i may have got this wrong) The philadelphia Experiment now never happened. We have diverted this much.

It was also said that the Timeline was shifted in a major way at some point (as much as 60%?) to keep it in existance. They really did mess with it so much at montauk, they actually had to shift it on purpose in some instances. Or it probably would have blinked out of existance.

In the other timeline where 43' and 83' were linked up this Loop will now exist as long at time itself does. The people inside this worldline are now stuck in the loop. Of course not many people will be interested in this, depending on there views toward the said Montauk events.

Creed,

can you expand on your third point - i was interested in this one specifically?
 
RMT, is that pic real? and am i to assume that the little white saucer thing is of course an alien space craft?
 
RMT, is that pic real? and am i to assume that the little white saucer thing is of course an alien space craft?
Click to expand...

First, one would need to define "real". I have, for quite a long time now, posted about how that which our senses deliver to us are a VERY small portion of the total reality of our universe.

Second, you should understand that not everything NASA knows is willingly shared with the world. They know a LOT more than they tell the world (including average Americans).

Our reality is in the process of changing. Governments don't want to admit to it, but there is little they can do to stop it.

If anyone honestly believes we are alone in this entire universe, it is time for you to wake-up from your naieve beliefs that only things you experience first-hand can be "real".

We are not the only denizens of this universe, and we are certainly not the most advanced.

RMT
 
Second, you should understand that not everything NASA knows is willingly shared with the world. They know a LOT more than they tell the world (including average Americans).
Click to expand...

Also not everything is shared with NASA. Though they'd probably like to believe otherwise.

Anyone who believes or can believe that we are the only Humans in the universe, really are very deserved of this assumption. Its only them that lose out in the end. At some point, the truth will out! Truth can only be suppressed, never gotten rid of.

(Also bare in mind the human template does not specifically mean exclusively Earth humans - even the pop-culture 'grey' is also basically 'Human').

'Offworld entities/Humans' are far better decriptions then 'aliens'.

Kind regards,
Olly
 
On beam shot into sol:

Looked at j-peg of o-part as positioned near sun.

Very provocative thoughts here.

Thank you RMT

Edit, date on sol j-peg, is year 2005.

Marciniack said in her book, 70s or earlier.I do not know.
 
Note on Marciniack, Earth The Pleiadean Keys book.

Was written in 80s 90s.Said beam was in the 70s or ealrier???

On RMT offered photo, was not established in Marciniack’s writings, weather discharge was close, or at a distance.

Sirians are tall, have very large heads, highly intelligent.

This is Earth-making news, if the sol j-peg still showing o-part via RMT’s giving, is not altered?
 
a 73% divergence from What? You have to have a starting point to claim divergence, and 73% from anything is going to be Major. Keep in mind a 0.00000000000000001% change would be more than enough for changes as extreme as you never being born, a diff president in the white house, man never landing on the moon.

I would like to know where this 73% divergence comes from and just what exactly it is related to? Also, again, according to Multiple timeline/worldline theory every universe is divergent from every other universe. And still without a Base there is no way to calculate divergence.
 
Ren,

Creedo was refering to Montauk accounts. There is little to no way of really expanding on that information unless you ring up Preston Nichols and present him with that same question. Even then that no solid proof.

The experiments at Montauk on time were dramatic. They pretty much played around with all major events regarding our history. Much of the time things worked and some of the time things didnt. Suffice to say, Often they really didnt have a clue what they were doing. Or how its was/wasn't working.

Like i said before though, depending on your view of the validity of Montauk. You might not even choose to even care for that information.

Kind regards,
Olly
 
"Our reality is in the process of changing" what you mean by that?
Click to expand...
When I make statements such as this, there are generally two levels of meaning. At the most direct level, it simply means that we are continuing to discover that things are not quite as we thought they were in our universe (e.g. the advent of our knowledge of dark energy and dark matter). This is in the Copernican tradition, and should come as no surprise to anyone... however, there are still people who exist today who act as if it is heresy to propose something that is against the scientific mainstream. In Copernicus' day these people would have been relegated to the Church. However, in modern times there are many in the scientific community who will now carry this torch.

At the deeper level, this statement is really pointing towards our new understanding of the relationship between energy and information (and why one can and does affect the other). Folks like John Archibald Wheeler and others describe our universe as being "holographic" in its true nature. At a superficial level this essentially means "what we see is not necessarily the way things really are."

RMT
 
As asked by Ren, meaning as of late, the timeline has diverged.

There are people who have defiantly died, but somehow in records, are all of a sudden now alive.

Shows timeline mixing.

Not in the same category as P. Nichols.
 
Note also by coasttocost.coms saying, there were time vortex rings, noted back in the eastern U.S. as posted on the coast to coast web site?
 
SO people are coming back from the dead, basicly? Is it a big problem? Should i stock pile shot guns/chain saws/ and Chem. 101 books? (10 points to who ever gets the reference)
 
This is may be viewed as very disrespectful. But the fact is, Preston and Al (and a couple of others) are part of the Montauk timeline. Even they don't know the origins of Montauk or P.Experiment.

They still don't know to what extent they are being used. It's a ctach 22 really. they bring the stuff out - but those clever enough to realise, know that they still can't be trusted. Sad but True.

Phil Schnieder was probably our best hope. And we all know what happened there. The question is this;

How was it that Phil Schneider was Killed (when he was suffering from terminal cancer anyway) Yet, Al and the Montauk gang are allowed to live beyond 2003 (those that 'had' too). Even though they were all privy to the same information as Phil, And also talk about his work and experiences, Relaying the same info he got killed for.

I think to an extent, this is maybe a telling situation.

Of course i'm probably wrong. But somethings doesn't quite fit.

Kind regards,
Olly
 
Back
Top