I believe that I have solved the dilemma of the violation of the law of conservation in time travel. To people not familiar with this violation, it in essence is this:
The conventional view of time-travel is that a person disappears out of the present and then instantaneously appears in the past. Is that correct? For now I shall assume as if it is.
Now, the problem is that when the person appears in the past, energy is created, not to mention the body's mass. (As air molecules are replaced.) And the same thing is true for in the present; it's a loss of energy, i.e. the air molecules have to fill in the void. To conventional scientists, this is a double violation of the law of conservation of energy, and thus time-travel in the manner hence described is impossible.
However, I have come up with an interesting solution to this problem. As Einstein and Minkowski said, space and time exist simultaneously in the space/time continuum (as its name implies.)
Now, according to the incorrect theory that most scientists use, there is a double violation of the law of conservation of energy because energy disappears from the present, and energy is added to the past.
But if you take into account Einstein and Minkowski's theory, then the net loss and gain of energy and mass CANCELS EACH OTHER out, viewed from an 'Absolute Observer', who is observing, so to speak, from outside the space/time continuum.
Thus, I believe that I have made this 'double violation' invalid. How do you like them apples?
The conventional view of time-travel is that a person disappears out of the present and then instantaneously appears in the past. Is that correct? For now I shall assume as if it is.
Now, the problem is that when the person appears in the past, energy is created, not to mention the body's mass. (As air molecules are replaced.) And the same thing is true for in the present; it's a loss of energy, i.e. the air molecules have to fill in the void. To conventional scientists, this is a double violation of the law of conservation of energy, and thus time-travel in the manner hence described is impossible.
However, I have come up with an interesting solution to this problem. As Einstein and Minkowski said, space and time exist simultaneously in the space/time continuum (as its name implies.)
Now, according to the incorrect theory that most scientists use, there is a double violation of the law of conservation of energy because energy disappears from the present, and energy is added to the past.
But if you take into account Einstein and Minkowski's theory, then the net loss and gain of energy and mass CANCELS EACH OTHER out, viewed from an 'Absolute Observer', who is observing, so to speak, from outside the space/time continuum.
Thus, I believe that I have made this 'double violation' invalid. How do you like them apples?