creedo299
Epochal Historian
Note on TTI
I do not know who has ownership of TTI.
I was primarily interested in TTI, as it was one area of interest, that captured my interests in technical fields, so that is why I had joined and posted here.
With the founding information that poster Razimus had come up with. This information was the emblem of said John Titor as the prime posting logo.This logo was on the founding page of TTI, then I would say that this might have something to do with John Titor and or its phenominon?
What is not figured here however, are other timelines and their possible effect, placed say if in other realities, there was an actually version of John Titor?
So as I had question Razimus in thread http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=25868&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
and this question incase these are corrupted archives, copy here>Okay Raz' since you're starting here all over again and I have had advisement to this effect this is what you are looking at.
Time paired realties always barrow from one another.
They do this, in order to maintain a parity, so that such instances as timequakes do not occur.
So you know for sure now, that there is no evidence of John Titor in another and or all timelines?
Let me hold your hand on this, since I have talked to the MOP here and he said adopt a differing view.
If I build say and F-4 Phantom Jet in this dimension and then by the sensing of timelines next to one another some artifact of this construction passes through the timelines?
Then I have to ask the question, in what way in other timelines, is this model of the famed F-4 phantom reproduced?
Do you know Raz, or can you say?
No' Im not brow beating you, however by your say, you are taking physics and this subject does deal with radial axial polarities.
Well if this spatial physics is correct given to you, by your proff, then what of said Titor and the essence of Tirtor and all his paraphernalia in other adjoining timelines?
There has to be other timelines in order for spatial space to work.
Creedo 299 end transference of copy from said thread
*Note that she skates by the question, as if this question does not exist?
Continue Creedo a problem and this must be asked, what if other timelines had barrowed from the John Titor story and the persona of John Titor then came to life?
There was also the said accusation that the appearance of John Titor was a capture-all, used to get something else?
However there are now two other componts given here which bear as mathematical parts of an overall equation.These are, what if Montauk was true and also varaited this supposed now stable timeline?
Secondly what if John Titor was true and together, with the said Montauk Experiment, had pushed this timeline over to a seventy-three percent margin, of changed variance?
Wow'.. these potentials really start to add up, from a little board that was supposed to be discussing the subject of time travel.
And additional to this, there are some precepts dealing with John Titor, that are in a way, predicting shortly, it seems what is happening with reference to the national state of affairs, in many couties.
So would it be any wonder, that the chif executive that might own TTI, may either want to sell TTI and all its projected problems, or sit back in some way and now discuss the term, plausible deniability.
Yes, this sounds familiar, as this is the term that a character Mr. Nimzickie, gave to the president, Bill Pullman, in the movie, (Independence Day).
There are other movies and this now seems the trend, that all deal with the term deniability, as big corporations often do, through no fault of their own,. get in trouble.
TTI has been a wonderful server of latitude on many subjects other than time travel such as the paranormal, or the UFO \ E.T. equation, plus the new alternate energy fields, which is another new section of TTI.
If Raul Burriel is trying to make a suggestion or offer a hint, this hint is already been enacted upon and there are new interest in others posting boards at this time.
However the act of interfering with this one posting bastion, seems by people's firewall break-in attempts, to be a fruitless exercise?
It has already been said and this is even on the front page as of now, that this is a time travel discussion board.
Not a board to where when a visitor come to have their say, then they have their system, not so much then in discussion discourse, attacked.
There is no reason for the firewall attacks and this is a fruitless and cowardly margin for those who want to do this sort of thing, to uphold.
This action by the hidden also strengthens certain convictions that there might be a veracity to some of the travel claims as well as timeline variances, which was given in Anomalies.net.
This say by a poster at Anomalies, was to the effect that certain landmarks had somehow changed their appearances, overnight.
I would care to reference a appearance of a large in-front of restaurant sign, to which the observer was told, "That sign has ale ways been there"!?, however the observer knew for sure, that this sign was never there.
>If the timelines have varaited a whopping seventy-three percent, then any action that John Titor could have taken, would then be a mute point at this time?
Thank you,
I do not know who has ownership of TTI.
I was primarily interested in TTI, as it was one area of interest, that captured my interests in technical fields, so that is why I had joined and posted here.
With the founding information that poster Razimus had come up with. This information was the emblem of said John Titor as the prime posting logo.This logo was on the founding page of TTI, then I would say that this might have something to do with John Titor and or its phenominon?
What is not figured here however, are other timelines and their possible effect, placed say if in other realities, there was an actually version of John Titor?
So as I had question Razimus in thread http://www.timetravelinstitute.com/ttiforum/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=time_travel&Number=25868&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1
and this question incase these are corrupted archives, copy here>Okay Raz' since you're starting here all over again and I have had advisement to this effect this is what you are looking at.
Time paired realties always barrow from one another.
They do this, in order to maintain a parity, so that such instances as timequakes do not occur.
So you know for sure now, that there is no evidence of John Titor in another and or all timelines?
Let me hold your hand on this, since I have talked to the MOP here and he said adopt a differing view.
If I build say and F-4 Phantom Jet in this dimension and then by the sensing of timelines next to one another some artifact of this construction passes through the timelines?
Then I have to ask the question, in what way in other timelines, is this model of the famed F-4 phantom reproduced?
Do you know Raz, or can you say?
No' Im not brow beating you, however by your say, you are taking physics and this subject does deal with radial axial polarities.
Well if this spatial physics is correct given to you, by your proff, then what of said Titor and the essence of Tirtor and all his paraphernalia in other adjoining timelines?
There has to be other timelines in order for spatial space to work.
Creedo 299 end transference of copy from said thread
*Note that she skates by the question, as if this question does not exist?
Continue Creedo a problem and this must be asked, what if other timelines had barrowed from the John Titor story and the persona of John Titor then came to life?
There was also the said accusation that the appearance of John Titor was a capture-all, used to get something else?
However there are now two other componts given here which bear as mathematical parts of an overall equation.These are, what if Montauk was true and also varaited this supposed now stable timeline?
Secondly what if John Titor was true and together, with the said Montauk Experiment, had pushed this timeline over to a seventy-three percent margin, of changed variance?
Wow'.. these potentials really start to add up, from a little board that was supposed to be discussing the subject of time travel.
And additional to this, there are some precepts dealing with John Titor, that are in a way, predicting shortly, it seems what is happening with reference to the national state of affairs, in many couties.
So would it be any wonder, that the chif executive that might own TTI, may either want to sell TTI and all its projected problems, or sit back in some way and now discuss the term, plausible deniability.
Yes, this sounds familiar, as this is the term that a character Mr. Nimzickie, gave to the president, Bill Pullman, in the movie, (Independence Day).
There are other movies and this now seems the trend, that all deal with the term deniability, as big corporations often do, through no fault of their own,. get in trouble.
TTI has been a wonderful server of latitude on many subjects other than time travel such as the paranormal, or the UFO \ E.T. equation, plus the new alternate energy fields, which is another new section of TTI.
If Raul Burriel is trying to make a suggestion or offer a hint, this hint is already been enacted upon and there are new interest in others posting boards at this time.
However the act of interfering with this one posting bastion, seems by people's firewall break-in attempts, to be a fruitless exercise?
It has already been said and this is even on the front page as of now, that this is a time travel discussion board.
Not a board to where when a visitor come to have their say, then they have their system, not so much then in discussion discourse, attacked.
There is no reason for the firewall attacks and this is a fruitless and cowardly margin for those who want to do this sort of thing, to uphold.
This action by the hidden also strengthens certain convictions that there might be a veracity to some of the travel claims as well as timeline variances, which was given in Anomalies.net.
This say by a poster at Anomalies, was to the effect that certain landmarks had somehow changed their appearances, overnight.
I would care to reference a appearance of a large in-front of restaurant sign, to which the observer was told, "That sign has ale ways been there"!?, however the observer knew for sure, that this sign was never there.
>If the timelines have varaited a whopping seventy-three percent, then any action that John Titor could have taken, would then be a mute point at this time?
Thank you,