creedo299
Epochal Historian
Note on all MEM\'s post:
Darby, from Anomalies correctly described the larger black hole, as affecting spatial mechanics, due to its size and reference to space, near this class of body.
It was supposed, not proven, that a simulated Kerrs black hole, was the product of two eletromechanical devices, which had produced tandem sets of field, which expressly terms, a temporal non-locality.
In order words, in the very technical sence, a Kerrs double black hole, or doublearity. I have termed this type of BH, is an area that does not exist time, however functions much the same way a soap bubble would, that is not affectant, to its own space and time.
What I am saying, is that the Kerr's double poled black hole, is only a passport, to other destinations?
Because of the both mechanics and size difference, one can not properly compare a Kerrs double poled BH, to the said G.E. unit manufactured black hole, in manifold exhausted Hawking Radiation, alone.
This is imposable to do, as even at proper size, the Kerrs would tend to maintain that injestion points of raw matter and energy from known debris entering this induction layers, of the Kerrs, would markedly differ from that of a single poled event injestion, of a standard model black hole.
*A note of caution however on the said and proposed Kerrs.
Any projected field from the gnerations of ((cluster momma BHes)), would throw an extremely hot field outward. This would cut through anything.It may be that a certain level of microwaves are produced, however the body of the auto would protect in this case?
Darby, from Anomalies correctly described the larger black hole, as affecting spatial mechanics, due to its size and reference to space, near this class of body.
It was supposed, not proven, that a simulated Kerrs black hole, was the product of two eletromechanical devices, which had produced tandem sets of field, which expressly terms, a temporal non-locality.
In order words, in the very technical sence, a Kerrs double black hole, or doublearity. I have termed this type of BH, is an area that does not exist time, however functions much the same way a soap bubble would, that is not affectant, to its own space and time.
What I am saying, is that the Kerr's double poled black hole, is only a passport, to other destinations?
Because of the both mechanics and size difference, one can not properly compare a Kerrs double poled BH, to the said G.E. unit manufactured black hole, in manifold exhausted Hawking Radiation, alone.
This is imposable to do, as even at proper size, the Kerrs would tend to maintain that injestion points of raw matter and energy from known debris entering this induction layers, of the Kerrs, would markedly differ from that of a single poled event injestion, of a standard model black hole.
*A note of caution however on the said and proposed Kerrs.
Any projected field from the gnerations of ((cluster momma BHes)), would throw an extremely hot field outward. This would cut through anything.It may be that a certain level of microwaves are produced, however the body of the auto would protect in this case?
