Unsubstantiated RMT?
Me thinks the "pressure" may have gone to his head~ need some asprin Darbs?
"Amplitude pressure" can also be effected via random bombardment of phase congegational waves, provided that the oscillations of ulf, or uhf frequencies are in synch with the harmonics of the pressure variances upon the surface of whatever is in flight.
These so called "Laws" of Physics you mention are not only misunderstood, they have been manipulated by others to create a 'biased perception' to conclude that anything outside of this misconception of how they function, are being sold as in violation to anything related to antigravitic propulsion concepts which demonstrate overunity and reated concepts when describing their power source.
Again there are no "Laws" of physics being violated at all, (on the contrary) in fact, it appears that you simply refuse to accept this. I'll give you that, since you might have difficulty wrapping your brain around all this (sigh) Moeover, it seems as if what you are describing according to your own limited perception of these laws are not only incomplete, but are always being rudimentionaly challenged!
*THE ENERGY OF EMPTY SPACE THAT ISN'T ZERO!
As for "Confronting Gravity." Krauss intended to have "a meeting where people would look forward to the key issues facing fundamental physics and cosmology".
This EDGE edition, which contains photos, is available on the EDGE Website at:
http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge188.html
Darby, as you know,
an electron is an integration of electro-magnetic waves. But an
electro-magnetic wave can be of positive or negative polarity. If we were to
send electro-magnetic pulses between magnets, the waves thus produced
would create an ether different from that on Earth. A variation in the
distance between the plates would bring about a modification in the ether
produced.
There are various means of producing more powerful energies, It can
be obtained by turning hydrogen into helium at low temperature and
bombarding deuterium with heavier mesons, releasing a fabulous amount of
energy; or by using ultra rays in an acid solution saturated with helium
nuclei. The latter process is the most usual.
How does the transformation of ultra rays into useable energy take
place?
If you allow radioactivity to pass through a magnetic field you will
get alpha, beta and gamma rays. The first are helium nuclei, the second
are electrons and the third are gamma rays which are similar to ultra
rays in their electro-magnetic content. These three components of
radioactivity are related. The ultra rays, or gamma rays, on passing close
to helium nuclei, bring about a deformation of space and give birth to
electrons until their wave energy is expended. Thus when gamma rays
pass through an acid solution saturated with helium nuclei, the newly
created electrons gyrate around the nuclei, but the acid prevents them from
joining up with the nuclei, and they are collected on plates at the
bottom of the apparatus. This provides an inexhaustible supply of energy
which requires nothing more than a little acid solution and some helium
nuclei.
If you were to travel in a spacecraft that contained an artificial
etheric atmosphere and not the ordinary Earth atmosphere, Note that your
eyes are accustomed to seeing the terrestrial ether, the artificial
ether would appear to be luminous inside.
Without this artificial ether no interplanetary voyage is possible.
If you tried to make a journey without this precaution, you could face
certain death. The fluid which binds you to your physical body would
leave you, and your body would instantly be crystallised. This is the
mystery of the crystallised bodies which reach the Earth in the form of
meteorites, (inclding the deformaties produced from the hutchinson effect experiments that
changed the molecular structures of materials subjected to this HE field)
thus any body travelling throughout interplanetary deep space without ether undergoes this process, whether it be made of carbon, calcium, iron, nickel, or any other element!
After passing out of the magnetic field of the Earth, all we need to
do is to create an ether similar to that of the planet to which we are
travelling, and we will then be attracted by it. We can create this
ether of another planet even on Earth, so that we will be repelled from
Earth and attracted to the other planet whose ether is contained within
our spaecraft.
To reach another planet, we need only to change the ether again to
propel ourselves once more into space.By this means life can be
maintained inside the craft whatever its construction, and at the same time it
provides us with a means of locomotion.
Ref: *The Hunt for Zero Point
Although this very recent book (August, 2001) is not yet available in the US, it contains some of the strongest evidence yet for major efforts and success in the field of antigravity technology. The author, Nick Cook, who for the past 15 years has been the Aviation Editor and Aerospace Consultant for Jane’s Defense Weekly, spent the last 10 years collecting information for the book. This included archival research on Nazi Germany’s antigravity technology and interviews with top officials at NASA, the Pentagon and secret defense installations. He shows that America has cracked the gravity code and classified the information at the highest security levels. Because antigravity and its allied zero point energy technologies potentially offer the world a future of unlimited, non-polluting energy it has been suppressed because of the "huge economic threat". His findings support those reported by many of the Disclosure Project witnesses cited above.
*Antigravity Technology Demonstrations
Although T. Brown reported many of his findings nearly a half century ago, other experimenters have just recently begun to reproduce his work and report it in the open literature and on the WWWeb. For example, Davenport published the results of his work in 1995 supporting the findings of T. Brown. More recently, Transdimensional Technologies in the USA and J. Naudin labs in France have posted on the WWWeb: diagrams, web videos, and data on their versions of antigravity "Lifters" based on an extension of Brown’s work. It is a sad commentary on this whole area of research to see that public science is requiring us to demonstrate principles that were demonstrated nearly fifty years ago.
There have also been a number of other demonstrations of "antigravity" phenomena by researchers throughout the world. This includes the work of Brazilian physics professor, Fran De Aquino, and such devices as: the Searl Electrogravity Disc, the Podkletnov Gravity Shield and Project Greenglow, the Zinsser Kineto-baric Field Propulsion and the Woodward Field Thrust Experiments on Piezoelectrics. All of these are described in more detail by
Souce: Theodore C. Loder, III
Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space
University of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824
[url=http://www.seaspower.com/Outsidethebox-Loder.htm]
*Challenging Newton
In her book Gravitational Force of the Sun,1 Pari Spolter criticizes the orthodox theory that gravity is proportional to the quantity or density of inert mass. She goes as far as to argue that there is no reason to include any term for mass in either of the force equations. She points out that to deduce from the earth-moon system that gravity obeys an inverse-square law (i.e. that its strength diminishes by the square of the distance from the attracting body), Newton did not need to know or estimate the masses of the earth and moon. He needed to know only the acceleration due to gravity at the earth’s surface, the radius of the earth, the orbital speed of the moon, and the distance between the earth and moon. And as already said, a body’s gravitational acceleration in free fall is independent of its mass, something that has been verified to a high degree of precision.2
Spolter rejects Newton’s second law (F = ma) as an arbitrary definition or convention, and maintains that it is not force that is equal to mass times acceleration, but weight. Her equation for ‘linear’ force is F = ad (acceleration times distance). Her equation for ‘circular’ force (including gravity) is F = aA, where a is the acceleration and A is the area of a circle with a radius equal to the mean distance of the orbiting body from the central body. She holds that the acceleration due to gravity declines by the square of the distance, but that the gravitational force of the sun, earth, etc. is constant for any body revolving around it. In newtonian theory, by contrast, it varies according to both the mass of the orbiting body and its distance from the central body.
Spolter’s theory contains several flaws. First, her attempt to deny any link between force and mass is unconvincing. She does not question the equation for a body’s momentum (momentum = mass times velocity), yet momentum with a rate of repetition constitutes a force, which therefore cannot be independent of mass. Moreover, weight is a type of force, rather than a completely separate phenomenon. Second, Spolter would have us believe that there are two types of force and energy – one linear and one circular – with different dimensions: she gives ‘linear’ force the dimensions metres squared per second squared, while ‘circular’ force is given the dimensions metres cubed per second squared. But there is no justification for inventing two forms of force and energy and for abandoning uniform dimensions in this way.
Third, defining ‘circular’ force in such a way that the gravitational force of a star or planet remains exactly the same no matter how far away from it we happen to be, is counterintuitive if not absurd. Furthermore, it is disingenuous of Spolter to say that her equation implies that acceleration is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. If it were true that a = F/A, with force (F) proportional to r3 (see below) and area (A = πr2) proportional to r2, acceleration would in fact be directly proportional to r3/r2 = r!
Spolter believes that her gravity equation solves the mystery of Kepler’s third law of planetary motion: this law states that the ratio of the cube of the mean distance (r) of each planet from the sun to the square of its period of revolution (T) is always the same number (r³/T² = constant). Her gravity equation can be rewritten: F = 22π3r3/T2. As explained elsewhere, the factor 22π3 is entirely arbitrary, and Spolter has merely obscured the real significance of Kepler’s constant.3
Gravity does not involve some (mean) area being accelerated around the sun, as Spolter’s equation implies. Rather, it involves a coupling of the mass-energy of the sun and planets, along with their associated massfree gravitational energy. And it acts not through empty space but through an energetic ether – something that is as much missing from Spolter’s physics as from orthodox physics (see section 3). As shown in subsequent sections, the net gravitational force need not be directly proportional to inert mass, as characteristics such as spin and charge can modify a body’s gravitational properties.
Spolter proposes that it is the rotation of a star, planet, etc. that somehow generates the gravitational force and causes other bodies to revolve around it – an idea advanced by the 17th-century astronomer Johannes Kepler.4 But she does not suggest a mechanism to explain how this might work, or what causes a celestial body to rotate in the first place. She shows that the mean distance of successive planetary orbits from the centre of the sun, or of successive lunar orbits from the centre of a planet, is not random but follows an exponential law, indicating that gravity is quantized on a macro scale, just as electron orbits in an atom are quantized on a micro scale. There is no generally accepted theory to explain this key fact either.
The Devil’s Dictionary defines gravitation as: ‘The tendency of all bodies to approach one another with a strength proportioned to the quantity of matter they contain – the quantity of matter they contain being ascertained by the strength of their tendency to approach one another’.5 Such is the seemingly circular logic underlying standard gravity theory. The figures given for the masses and densities of all planets, stars, etc. are purely theoretical; nobody has ever placed one on a balance and weighed it! It should be borne in mind, however, that weight is always a relative measure, since one mass can only be weighed in relation to some other mass. The fact that observed artificial satellite speeds match predictions is usually taken as evidence that the fundamentals of newtonian theory must be correct.
The masses of celestial bodies can be calculated from what is known as Newton’s form of Kepler’s third law, which assumes that Kepler’s constant ratio of r³/T² is equal to the inert mass of the body multiplied by the gravitational constant divided by 4π² (GM = 4π²r³/T² = v²r [if we substitute 2πr/v for T]). Using this method, the earth’s mean density turns out to be 5.5 g/cm³. Since the mean density of the earth’s outer crust is 2.75 g/cm³, scientists have concluded that the density of the earth’s inner layers must increase substantially with depth. However, there are good reasons for questioning the standard earth model.6
Source: Gravity and Antigravity
David Pratt
Feb 2001, Feb 2005
[url=http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DP5/gravity.htm]
*[url="http://ROSCHIN & GODIN: Searl Effect "]ROSCHIN & GODIN: Searl Effect
*
SEARL: Searl Effect
Note: In the Searl and Godin & Roschin SEG - an inner stator is rotated at speed to the point where the outer rollers start to self rotate in a cycloidal action around the stator. The stator is itself made up of layers of iron, titanium, nylon and neodymium, with the inner layer of iron then being magnetised in a fairly complex way.
"Consider the bottom section of the UFO as an enclosed circular cavity wherein the energy fields can be developed into fields of high permittivity.
The group velocities of the electromagnetic waves will consequently be slowed down. A packet of such electromagnetic waves when ejected tangentially out of that cavity will be a stretched wave-packet. When it leaves the rim and rounds the upper dome shell that stretched wave-packet begins to compress as it curls around the dome through smaller curvature toward the dome's apex. Magnetic pads situated around the apex by working on both the radial element of the electromagnetic wave-packet and on the craft's magnetic flux lines will allow the craft's flux lines to form into a collimated helical filament-tube with pre-designated trajectory. The wave-packets curling round the dome can then curl round the apex and into that collimated filament-tube, and be accelerated ahead of the craft along a pre-designated trajectory.
The geometry of the upper dome and the inhomogeneity of the craft's flux lines will work in concert with the geometry of the filament-tube to compress the envelope of that wave-packet in a way analogous to a chirped circularly-polarized field. Back-scatter could also be envisioned to act as an additional compressive mechanism to further amplify the amplitude of that moving field. Either way, the much amplified wave-packet will be sent ahead of the craft.
The result of this action will of course be fully dependent upon what energies the wave-packets will be comprised of and too their repetition rate. It will be sufficient to say here that if these factors are dialed-in correctly the wave-packet will become the most intense field of energy (of that particular kind of energy) in the immediate vicinity of that craft, succinctly more intense than when they left the craft's rim as a lowly stretched pulse. So therefore that craft would have no choice but to be dragged in whatever direction those compressed and intensified wave-packets were sent.
Travel in space would be easy as the craft would be buoyant and would have no gravitational weight. But so too would it be easy in earth's atmosphere if inside the craft there were means by which a horizontal gravitational center were in operation providing a more powerful attraction than earth's vertical gravitational field"
---Paul E Potter
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ufophysics
Related:
http://laufo.com/ufophysics/science.html
