My Own (Selfish) Mark In Time - CARPAL TUNNEL!

RainmanTime

Super Moderator
Psst...

I dunno if anyone cares, cuz I bet most people think I'm just a loud-mouth a-hole... but...

I just realized I have reached the level of "Carpal Tunnel" here on TTI!

What I don't yet know is whether that is a "good" thing or a "bad" thing. /ttiforum/images/graemlins/confused.gif
RMT
 
Dear loving father Ray, intercourse, of the love fountain, wholeness, with granola on it'

I think they screwed up here.

You get carpal tunnel syndrome, then your get Grand Poobah., not the other way around?
 
Dear loving father Ray, intercourse, of the love fountain, wholeness, with granola on it'

I think they screwed up here.

You get carpal tunnel syndrome, then your get Grand Poobah., not the other way around?

Creedo 299
Hmmph. I reckon this is an exhibition of a tad bit of jealousy from Creeds, now that I have achieved the same level as he.

I never got Grand Poobah... but just like you, I did reach the level of Poobah.

Poobah, Grand Poobah... that's an order of magnitude difference, eh friend? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif

RMT
 
If there is one thing I have noticed is that you spend an awful amount of time justifying your beliefs by disputing your opponents on every negative comment they may have on one of your theories. What I have learned is that you cannot convert everyone. Some people are so wrapped up in their own interpretations of the world they cannot escape them, regardless if they are wrong or right. People, like you and I, who reason by the Scientific Method and its ways usually have the insight of being educated enough to know to use it as a basis of discussion. Regardless of that, well educated people are like everyone else, they still hate being wrong.

Just because one uses the scientific method to justify their beliefs does not make them right because the belief could still be falsified or changed at a later date like anything else. Also, just because one does not use the scientific method does not necessarily make their views of the world wrong, it's just that there is no justification. So when someone with a questionable belief makes their case, the best you could do is find falsehoods in the logic, make your case and move on. As I mentioned earlier you cannot convert everybody. Come up with a theory for your observation, debate on it, and if people can't reason with your logic despite the fact that the theory answers it, just move on.


For the better part of 4 years I have been paying as much attention to the news as possible, reading up on all sorts of issues and advancing my knowledge in the field of work that I do. Despite the fact that I feel more enlightened and more rounded in a discussion than I did 4 years ago, and despite the fact that I make more money now and I am a different person, there is a part of me that feels dead. I've been learning to just let certain things that are currently out of my control go, and to try and live a little.

That’s it for my ramble; I’ve been listening to the Modest Mouse Album “The Moon and Antarctica.” It takes awhile, but if you could get into their style of music, you’ll find that their albums have some of the smartest lyrics around. This particular album mentions a little of everything from the Big Bang, Science, antisocialism, God, to reincarnation and the negative aspects of having a developed Super Ego. It’s one album that came at just the right time for me.

So my advice is to relax, take your new call sign literally and let your hands rest a little!
 
Hi bcforn,

You are right in much of what you say, but especially correct here:
Just because one uses the scientific method to justify their beliefs does not make them right because the belief could still be falsified or changed at a later date like anything else.
Very true; however, use of the scientific method (properly) ensures falsifiability, and that in and of itself makes it a more viable approach than a non-scientific one. And you will note that I have often asked for people to properly falsify my scientific theories (I don't expect them to falsify my beliefs, but they are welcome to try). So far, no takers. That could mean it cannot be falsified (as yet) or it could also mean no one wants to try. Either way, I am OK with it.

Your point seems to be that I am a bit of a "pitbull" for the scientific method and being able to show scientific reasoning for theories. Yes, this is true and I accept such a label. I don't think it is about "converting" anyone. However, I am a teacher of engineering, and I have continued to witness poor (or absent) application of science to form beliefs about what may be true in our (US) society. The John Titor Experiment is a perfect example. Did you see the Time cover story on the drastic rise in high school dropouts? It's appalling to me, and so you might consider that I am on a "mission" to stamp-out scientific ignorance wherever I can. Whether the person I debate with becomes "converted" or not is less important than the fact that there may just be 1, or 2, or more lurkers out there who learn something new... from a scientific approach... which is still the best "test" for reality we have and has resulted in the advances we enjoy in our modern world... like this internet!

Thanks for the constructive criticism. Believe it or not, I have already taken some of it to heart.
RMT

P.S. - wa1ex, I think I need to see more of your foundational math...because as-is there seem to be some discontinuities in it! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
carpal tunnel is a result of dedication which takes time...as times goes by your life gets shorter...as life gets shorter it will eventually meet its end.
 
Back
Top