More on Hawking Radiation
- Thread starter MEM
- Start date
Darby
Epochal Historian
MEM,
Sure...I'll give it a go...considering that it is (as I recall) my post that he was respondng to.
His response was nonsense. It shows that Boomer didn't have a firm grasp on what Hawking Radiation is.
It goes without saying that Hawking Radiation wouldn't "go on" without the presence of virtual particles because Hawking Radiationis the result of virtual particles (that are given a sufficient energy boost at the limb of the event horizon to become real particles).
They aren't part of the black hole. Virtual particles pop in and out of the vacuum all the time. They take on their specific characteristic of being Hawking Radiation because they are in the grasp of the extreme gravitational field of the BH.
Sure...I'll give it a go...considering that it is (as I recall) my post that he was respondng to.
His response was nonsense. It shows that Boomer didn't have a firm grasp on what Hawking Radiation is.
It goes without saying that Hawking Radiation wouldn't "go on" without the presence of virtual particles because Hawking Radiationis the result of virtual particles (that are given a sufficient energy boost at the limb of the event horizon to become real particles).
They aren't part of the black hole. Virtual particles pop in and out of the vacuum all the time. They take on their specific characteristic of being Hawking Radiation because they are in the grasp of the extreme gravitational field of the BH.
Hercules
Temporal Navigator
I dont understand why people are targeted in proving that Titor was a hoax. Even if he was a hoax, he was not harming anyone. He was very interesting and entertaining. :D
I can say none of HIS statements can be FLAWED even if he was a hoax- interesting guy.
But what if...? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/frown.gif
I can say none of HIS statements can be FLAWED even if he was a hoax- interesting guy.
But what if...? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/frown.gif
RenUnconscious
Quantum Scribe
but what if What?
Honestly, I have not made my mind up one way or another about John Titor and it sure is fun trying to prove or disprove some of his statements. but what do you mean what if?
creedo299
Epochal Historian
From Thursday's Child by Bartsuick.
*How black holes are thought to be configured from the Hawking investigative group, is that Hawking Radiation is expressed by the near poles of any one black hole.
Hawking Radiation occurs as a result of microwave heating, as a result of the BH ingesting certain amounts, of raw space debris.
The gravity is such, that individual atoms are striped of their valient bondings, and a stream of infer-red radiation is noted, in studies so far, on these phenomenon.?Not exact, but roughly what Bartsuiack had said of black holes in her book.
The description of how matter is taken into and digested into a Kerrs, black hole, is not even put forward as of yet.
This is so, as a Kerrs is a double polled entity, not a singular device, as was the area of study, from the early post Hawking group.
It may be, that some elements of the exterior of a Kerrs phenomenon, act much like a messy finger painting, whereas the action of only a singular black holes, acts as a funnel.
The exterior of the Kerrs phenomenon, acts differently than a singular event and Hawking Radiation might in some way, be expressed diffently that a singular BH?
The proposed electromechanical entity, of a simulated Kerrs double poled black hole, may be an extension of how only some respects of a Kerrs double poled phenomenon, is supposed to act.
One thing for sure, is the Chanderschar limit, which is muddled within its configuration, to reside the event shell of the Krerrs double radii phenomenon, miles away from the heart of the said black hole clusters.
This would not happen in nature, however the event shell of a naturally occurring Kerrs, would remain very close, to the internal double BH radii, rather than almost a half light year away, if you were to scale the parts up a bit, in size.
Secondly as reported by Pamela, when the said simulated Kerrs is activated, an immeadte super hot event shell is created, which would cut through anything.
There must be a burst of some X-rays, however this X-ray area burst, which is how the Hawking group found their study BH, is caused again from the rough ingestion of raw rubble into the black hole itself.
The main danger to the occupants of this type of proposed vehicle, would be microwave radiation, as the exterior event shell, would be producing copius amounts of microwaves, in the standard operation of this kind of event shell.
The auto-body would ward off some of these effects, however what concerns me, is the glass of the auto itself?
How do you keep these microwaves from pentitrating into the crew compartment of this proposed vehicle and killing all of its occupants?
A metal rub on the windows.
*How black holes are thought to be configured from the Hawking investigative group, is that Hawking Radiation is expressed by the near poles of any one black hole.
Hawking Radiation occurs as a result of microwave heating, as a result of the BH ingesting certain amounts, of raw space debris.
The gravity is such, that individual atoms are striped of their valient bondings, and a stream of infer-red radiation is noted, in studies so far, on these phenomenon.?Not exact, but roughly what Bartsuiack had said of black holes in her book.
The description of how matter is taken into and digested into a Kerrs, black hole, is not even put forward as of yet.
This is so, as a Kerrs is a double polled entity, not a singular device, as was the area of study, from the early post Hawking group.
It may be, that some elements of the exterior of a Kerrs phenomenon, act much like a messy finger painting, whereas the action of only a singular black holes, acts as a funnel.
The exterior of the Kerrs phenomenon, acts differently than a singular event and Hawking Radiation might in some way, be expressed diffently that a singular BH?
The proposed electromechanical entity, of a simulated Kerrs double poled black hole, may be an extension of how only some respects of a Kerrs double poled phenomenon, is supposed to act.
One thing for sure, is the Chanderschar limit, which is muddled within its configuration, to reside the event shell of the Krerrs double radii phenomenon, miles away from the heart of the said black hole clusters.
This would not happen in nature, however the event shell of a naturally occurring Kerrs, would remain very close, to the internal double BH radii, rather than almost a half light year away, if you were to scale the parts up a bit, in size.
Secondly as reported by Pamela, when the said simulated Kerrs is activated, an immeadte super hot event shell is created, which would cut through anything.
There must be a burst of some X-rays, however this X-ray area burst, which is how the Hawking group found their study BH, is caused again from the rough ingestion of raw rubble into the black hole itself.
The main danger to the occupants of this type of proposed vehicle, would be microwave radiation, as the exterior event shell, would be producing copius amounts of microwaves, in the standard operation of this kind of event shell.
The auto-body would ward off some of these effects, however what concerns me, is the glass of the auto itself?
How do you keep these microwaves from pentitrating into the crew compartment of this proposed vehicle and killing all of its occupants?
A metal rub on the windows.
RenUnconscious
Quantum Scribe
Herc,
I know IT is Ginger is the stupid Segway thingy from dean kamen. is that what you're referring to? lol
I know IT is Ginger is the stupid Segway thingy from dean kamen. is that what you're referring to? lol