In the past couple of decades scientists have played with light, making it faster and making it slower. Recently a galaxy that is further away then any one has ever seen before (thought to be at the dawn of the universe) was discovered, the galaxy is in redshift 7, which is 500 million years old. At present day the universe is said to be over 13 billion years old.
Now we all no like doesnt is fast, incredibly fast but its not fast enough for us to see real time of events in the galaxy, as described with the recent discovery of a galaxy that apears to be 500 million years old when we no the universe is 13 billion years old. The position of this galaxy is also said to be at the edge of the universe ( hmm ) but any way.
It has taken over 12.5 billion years for that light to reach us. And well that tells us light doesnt move fast... As we can see into the past, yes the past, this galaxy in theory if we went to it now could possibly not even be their any more. As we are only seeing the light coming from it over 12 billion years ago. Alot can happen in that time frame.
So to fininsh with them starting paragraphs, lets talk about the theory.
As we see using light, it reflects of an object into are eyes.
The scenario-
Your in front of a mirror, the speed of light has been reduced to 50cm/s (to date this speed has all ready been recoreded) using extreme conditions (radiation, gases, cold, ect..) you wave into the mirror, the light comes from the source hits the mirror and then hits your eye, and you are then able to see. But if the speed of light was slown down to the point where a delay was created that could mean you would be able to wave into the mirror wait 4 seconds and then you would see your reflection mirroring (pun intended) your exact movement.
Now that would mean you just saw into the past, the past that happen 4 seconds ago.
The same thing could happen if you increased the speed of light, the same scenario above but if the speed of light was incrased, this theory of seeing into the future using light has been shown and proven with an experiment that tested a beam of light entering a cell even before it had left it. The laws of physics were not broken though (before any of you start complaining /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif ).
The decrease of light, being the easiest one to explain is the most plausable as we have done it.
The increase of light, being the hardest one to explain is the most unplausable even thought we have increased it, the concept and logic behind this idea is unknown.
Any way, i've been writing this for 10 minutes now, their is alot more i wont to say but my tea is getting cold. I'll leave you all to read, ponder and write about how exellent this theory is or you can knock it and write how this wouldnt be logical. I welcome this and i need critisum so i can expand my theory.
A good example of practicle use using decrease of light is the film DeJa Vue, even though its a crude example, it shows that if light was reflected at a slowed rate onto a targeted area and a camera or thermal imaging device was to record this happening that we could see into the past. Even though the plot behind that film was using a generator and a worm hole (something like that).
Now we all no like doesnt is fast, incredibly fast but its not fast enough for us to see real time of events in the galaxy, as described with the recent discovery of a galaxy that apears to be 500 million years old when we no the universe is 13 billion years old. The position of this galaxy is also said to be at the edge of the universe ( hmm ) but any way.
It has taken over 12.5 billion years for that light to reach us. And well that tells us light doesnt move fast... As we can see into the past, yes the past, this galaxy in theory if we went to it now could possibly not even be their any more. As we are only seeing the light coming from it over 12 billion years ago. Alot can happen in that time frame.
So to fininsh with them starting paragraphs, lets talk about the theory.
As we see using light, it reflects of an object into are eyes.
The scenario-
Your in front of a mirror, the speed of light has been reduced to 50cm/s (to date this speed has all ready been recoreded) using extreme conditions (radiation, gases, cold, ect..) you wave into the mirror, the light comes from the source hits the mirror and then hits your eye, and you are then able to see. But if the speed of light was slown down to the point where a delay was created that could mean you would be able to wave into the mirror wait 4 seconds and then you would see your reflection mirroring (pun intended) your exact movement.
Now that would mean you just saw into the past, the past that happen 4 seconds ago.
The same thing could happen if you increased the speed of light, the same scenario above but if the speed of light was incrased, this theory of seeing into the future using light has been shown and proven with an experiment that tested a beam of light entering a cell even before it had left it. The laws of physics were not broken though (before any of you start complaining /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif ).
The decrease of light, being the easiest one to explain is the most plausable as we have done it.
The increase of light, being the hardest one to explain is the most unplausable even thought we have increased it, the concept and logic behind this idea is unknown.
Any way, i've been writing this for 10 minutes now, their is alot more i wont to say but my tea is getting cold. I'll leave you all to read, ponder and write about how exellent this theory is or you can knock it and write how this wouldnt be logical. I welcome this and i need critisum so i can expand my theory.
A good example of practicle use using decrease of light is the film DeJa Vue, even though its a crude example, it shows that if light was reflected at a slowed rate onto a targeted area and a camera or thermal imaging device was to record this happening that we could see into the past. Even though the plot behind that film was using a generator and a worm hole (something like that).