"Religion is taken seriously and everyone can multiple and divide in the[ir] heads."
what the hell. is he trying to say the educational system is greatly improved? everyone can multiply and divide in their heads as it is. why would religion be taken more seriously? religion is a millenia old tradition that the human race is finally starting to shake. we are getting to the point where we realise that our many bibles are metaphorical. i refuse to believe that religion is being taken more seriously as time goes on. what he was doing in this sentence is trying to make the world seem a better place; it's just clear sensationalism.
why didn't he say anything about 9/11? if he's going to mention that a civil war breaks out in america i don't think he would have any special reservations against mentioning an impending tragedy that would prove beyond doubt that all of his words were true.
barring an intuitional debunking of john titor, let's look at time travel. if time travel were possible, we would know by now. someone would have travelled back in time by now. and i'm not talking about travelling back in time to post on a time travel message board about how you're from the future. if time travel were ever possible, the people of the future would make it known to the people of now, or perhaps the people of long ago. also likely is that travelling back in time would produce so many paradoxes that no one would ever do it. so either it is never possible, or it would never be done, but it hasn't been done yet so we can assume it's never been discovered.
what the hell. is he trying to say the educational system is greatly improved? everyone can multiply and divide in their heads as it is. why would religion be taken more seriously? religion is a millenia old tradition that the human race is finally starting to shake. we are getting to the point where we realise that our many bibles are metaphorical. i refuse to believe that religion is being taken more seriously as time goes on. what he was doing in this sentence is trying to make the world seem a better place; it's just clear sensationalism.
why didn't he say anything about 9/11? if he's going to mention that a civil war breaks out in america i don't think he would have any special reservations against mentioning an impending tragedy that would prove beyond doubt that all of his words were true.
barring an intuitional debunking of john titor, let's look at time travel. if time travel were possible, we would know by now. someone would have travelled back in time by now. and i'm not talking about travelling back in time to post on a time travel message board about how you're from the future. if time travel were ever possible, the people of the future would make it known to the people of now, or perhaps the people of long ago. also likely is that travelling back in time would produce so many paradoxes that no one would ever do it. so either it is never possible, or it would never be done, but it hasn't been done yet so we can assume it's never been discovered.