Re: Is there any device that has not been concider
Hello,
To understand a possible device you have to understand the relation of time in
our physical realm as compaired to infinity.
I propose a new fundamental understanding of time and space.
All physical objects in our universe are finite in dimension embeded into
a universe of infinite space and time.
Objects of finite units of space and time are in a state of constant
motion in other words in a state of forever motion or at least until
the end of our universe.
What does this mean?
If my proposal is true then.(as I see it)
Each unit of space and time has a max and min "length".
embeded into a infinite field of space and time.
If true this would effectively explain basically not only how of the
universe but "why" as well. Since elementary particles would be considered
a geometric construction in 3 dimensions of fundamental units of space time
construction- blocks of finite length. I have been beating my brains on how
to create a math model of this for many years with no success yet.
To visulise this, understand our universe and the elementary particles
that make it up are of one size, this size is finite in a infinite field.
Imagine that you had a universe inside a ant's eye ball, Imagine our universe
is embedded in a head of pin. If you can imagine this then you can understand
fundamentally what I am saying. Our universe is the only one of our "size" at
this space time, as far as I can tell.
If you understand this then fundamentally to build a time machine you
must find a machine to "create" a time that is larger or smaller than
our time. How is a big problem.
Generally I think a set of rings that are set up to create a field between them
may do it. To artifically bathe the device and center object with a different
space time field than normal.
I think this may be could be done, the trick is not letting the inner ring
and outer ring become sycronised in space time. Then you would be able to create
a field that has a different space time than what is normally possible in our
space time. Rings are just one concept, any way to create this field is the
main thing.
To understand further, you must consider that there is a max and min of
space time. A min possible speed as opposed to a max possible
speed. The speed of light is well known. There should be a corrasponding min
possible CONSTANT speed in our space time. Following this there should be
a min and max acceration as well. Note though such calculations are difficult
and only understandable in knowing that we are embedded in a infinite field
and our space time must interface with this infinite field in order to exist
in a stable way. The way "it" does this is by constant motion of our space
time in all objects, including inside the elementary particles. The elementary
particles are built up in a geometric way using space time as building blocks.
For instance particles of light are max velocity in one direction , to create
a 3 dimensional object the other two dimensions must be filled somehow. Using
radial coorodinates the other two dimensions are made into a circle perpendicular
to the axis of motion of the particle of light. Speed min is along the circle
and the radial dimension varies between max and min depending on the particle
of light, this gives the variance of energy levels of each particle of light.
Simular geometric creations can be done for other particals. I must confess
that even though I have put a lot of thought to this I don't know the exact
rules of particle creation or even exactly how to build them correctly.
My theory though gives some sense of why only so many particles and
the anti particles and even why the short time length of existance
of most particles. Anti particles are just the same as normal particles
but rotating in a different direction. The proton is a different geometic
stable creation that leaves out a dimension that matchs the make up
of the electron, fundamentally a nutron is a proton and electron together
in terms of its geometic creation. It depends on how the 3 deminsions
are filled up buy the building blocks of space time.
Of course to accept my ideas you have to consider a modification of
special and general theory of relativity. It is simple, there are
3 dimensions of space and 3 dimensions of time. Normally you consider
a 3 dimensional object so there is no conflict with realitivity. The troubles
start with very small objects, getting into their internal structures and so on.
How to build a actual time machine? Set a object pulsing at one space time,
and set another pulsing at a space time. In other words take a electric
currenty and set it osculating at 20 cycles per second. Then set another
at 20 cycles per second. The trick is seperating them so that the fields
meet each other at some fraction of min space/time in the center of the two.
This would be very difficult as they would want to match up with each other
and a very slight movement of eather one would get them to be in sinc
in terms of space/time. On very small objects it should be more achievable
to create this situation, hince quantum mechanics.
Dan
