Is any of this true?

Pro7

Temporal Navigator
part one:
http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx1.htm

part two:
http://www.rense.com/general79/wdx2.htm

Someone is claiming that our stars in the skies are not really stars, but ships masquerading as stars. If that is true, it would explain a great detail about those 'stars' moving around in the night sky of the earth, thought to be satellites, but are something else. I have seen these 'stars' move so many times, I thought they were satellites. Compelling evidence is shown in these links. Hmmm...
 
Most interesting!!!

http://www.rense.com/general67/hackerfeelsUSnavyhas.htm

Hacker Feels US Navy Has
Spaceships, Crews In Space
7-15-5

He did a few trial runs, hacking into Oxford University's network, for example, and he found the whole business "incredibly exciting. And then it got more exciting when I started going to places where I really shouldn't be."

"Like where?" I ask.

"The US Space Command," he says.

"What was the most exciting thing you saw?"

"I found a list of officers' names," he says, "under the heading 'Non-Terrestrial Officers'. It doesn't mean little green men. What I think it means is not Earth-based. I found a list of 'fleet-to-fleet transfers', and a list of ship names. I looked them up. They weren't US Navy ships. What I saw made me believe they have some kind of spaceship, off-planet."

"The Americans have a secret spaceship?" I ask.

"That's what this trickle of evidence has led me to believe."

------

Is it a coincidence that the person viewing those "large ships" in orbit has already been confirmed by this hacker? hmm..
 
The Navy and 'Non-Terrestrial Officers'?

It could also mean off-world as in worldline, or dimension.


Perhaps they already have bases on the moon or mars. One would really never know.
Wouldn't that make them non-terrestrial as well?
 
We do have a base on Mars. It was established when the mars exploration rover arrived, but one thing about the rover, its job wasnt only collecting/analyzing specimens. NASA have kept that out of general public knowledge. How do I know? One of the Cornell alumni at TRD built the precursor to the mars exploration rover at cornell. The alumni and others were then hired by NASA to build a working prototype based on their plastic wooden designs. After the prototype was a successful build, then NASA took over the entire project with their own scientists.

The alumni told me something I never realized. We were talking about bases on other planets. We talked about a base on the moon. I said "no way, impossible", the alumni pointed out, "we did land on the moon, right?" I said "yea" then thats called a base in NASA's eyes. NASA is very clever and cautious not to mention anything about a "base" anywhere in regards to moon landings and mars.

So many pictures and claims about underground stuff being found on mars via probes, etc..the cornell alumni and I had long talks about Mars. A fascinating subject which we both do agree that NASA got alot of stuff hidden up their sleeves.

And yes, it would be called 'non-terrestrial' once anything leaves the planet Earth to land elsewhere however thats in my point of view. Other people would call anything "non-terrestrial" as long it didnt originate from Earth.
 
Yea I have seen that video before.

Know what is really BS around here? China has now been hacking the US systems as well. Wonder how much they know. I know that the govt is using mckinnon as a prime example to influence society, well GUESS WHAT! IT ISNT GONNA WORK! People will continue hacking computer systems NO MATTER how much anyone likes it or not!

One of the greatest 'guvmint' secrets is to be using some geek like mckinnon, to give him a maximum jail term. He arrives to jail... then some dude looking like a man in black shows up, offers him a deal. That deal is not in the public view.

There is a rule of ethics I have read from the "underground networks" about being a hacker. One of the rules state CLEARLY:



A true hacker never gets caught.

If a hacker gets caught, then that person isnt a hacker at all. That is a rule of clarity.
 
Back
Top