I have proof time travel is posible, lets get real

J

johnmcm

Temporal Novice
It appears to me after reading through the many treads that for a site called "Time travel Institute" you are not taking the subject very seriously.

There is real proof that it is indeed possible that we can travel in time.

So if we are all serious about leading the field and being recognised for our contribution, I suggest we pool our obvious abundance of time and do some real reseach and experiments with our findings as a group.

If anyone is interested in forming a real research and experiment group post your "progressive comments" and suggestions.

Or maybe there is a need for a real "Institute" web site.

If you don't really beleave it is posible to tavel through time. Take a little time to read the facts about experiments that are taking place as we speak in real "institution" and it may wet your appitite.

If you are indeed interested I will be happy to share my findings to date. I guarantee you, you will be amazed at what is already posible.

We are truly on the edge of a huge leap in time.
 
There are some of us here, that don't doubt for a moment not only its possible, but that is going on as we speak.

There are many decent serious threads in this forum with regards to time travel information. You'd have to sift them out though, away from all the titor and nonsense related posts.

There quite a few posters here that aren't just 'hobbyists' and take the subject very seriously. You'd be surprised.

Kind regards,

Olly.
 
JohnMcM,

There is real proof that it is indeed possible that we can travel in time.
Click to expand...

OK, whet our appetites. Lead us to some real proof. I'm aware of many solutions to General Relativity that state in theory that non-STR time travel is possible but they all include criteria that is not known to exist.

Universal net angular momentum is the basis of the initial 1948 time travel theory by Kurt Godel. The universe has to have a considerable net angular momentum in violation of what is believed to be a fundamental law of conservation. It also requires a static universe (neither expanding nor contracting) which isn't the case.

Morris, Thorne and Yurtsever proposed a scheme similar to Titor's Gadget which involves manipulating wormholes with electromagnetic fields. Their wormholes are definitely not Titorian. This was done at the request of Carl Sagan for his novel "Contact." But the wormhole solutions are unstable. Any matter falling into the wormhole causes them to collapse.

Gott proposed infinitely long cosmic strings moving past each other at near c velocity in opposite directions and very close to each other where one flys a figure-8 around them.

Tipler proposed infinitely long neutronium cylinders spinning at 3/4 c - which is similar to Gott's cosmic strings. Infinitely long anything isn't much help.
 
Back
Top