I have an Idea

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Ok, I know that somewhere in my life I have heard that it is a fact that flying into outer space at the speed of light for (blank) amount of Earth days, when you return, you would have spent a longer time gone on Earth than you did in space.

(if anyone has any information on this subject above or where I could get information, email me at [email protected])

Now, if this is true, it seems to make sense out of why no one has visited us from the future (or in history I should say), because you could travel into the future, but not in the past. It is a simple logic answer, if my basis is correct, which I would like to converse with someone who has high interest in the matter.
 
Launching ones self into space at 186,000 miles per second can be a tad dangerous. Too if you ever lost your brakes at that speed you'd NEVER get back.
 
There are other mainstream physics ways to time travel. Ever heard of a Tipler cylinder? You could travel back in time to any point after the cylinder was constructed.

Hey - you aren't the same pickle that was sighted floating ominously over Ottawa, are you?
 
Back
Top