Human Being: SomeOne Else's System Design

RainmanTime

RainmanTime

Super Moderator
Human Being: SomeOne Else\'s System Design

Why is the Human Being the highest form of intelligent design on earth?

Is it not safe to assume that because this is true, the architecture of the human system is somehow "special" or at least "dominant"?

What if someone could demonstrate that the architectural structure of each and every human body perfectly aligns with a universal (3x3) Common Matrix System Architecture (CMSA)?

Human beings are amazingly complex and capable creatures. Is it really so difficult to believe that some LARGER (exo) system beyond our Earth "designed" a human species that exactly followed the Matrix form and function of other proto-intelligences?

Rather than killing each other, wouldn't it be good to understand our common human body system design so we could come to conclusions about WHO or WHAT MIGHT have acted to design us as a species?

The human body is an amazing AMAZING exhibition of subsystem design and integration into a Matrix Supersystem called mankind. Understanding the perfection of the system design helps you understand more and more about its Creator.

RMT
 
Re: Human Being: SomeOne Else\'s System Design

Instead of running its designed program, RMT, the human organism of this period seems to be running a "widget".
No one knows with any certainty what the human organism is really capable of doing. There are many anecdotal stories of the feats of yogis and shamans. Perhaps it is possible to actually teleport from place to place.Who knows enough to say "No Way"?
 
Re: Human Being: SomeOne Else\'s System Design

Greetings 2U PB:
Instead of running its designed program, RMT, the human organism of this period seems to be running a "widget".
Click to expand...
/ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif Uh oh...someone's catching on!
Actually, it's not so much a widget as it is my own home-brew system hack. Having the skill for being able to reverse-engineer system functional and operational designs from their physical implementation allows one to crack the Human OS quite readily. In fact, once you know the base codes (via DNA information analysis) you can gain access to all the system primitives, which are not heavily secured.
No one knows with any certainty what the human organism is really capable of doing.
Click to expand...
Very well stated, PB. Our documented human history has certainly shown an ability to exceed the achievments of humans from previous Times. So it is really a trivial (but pertinent) conclusion that the human system is certainly capable of achieving higher and higher levels of functional energy performance as Time unfolds. In fact, all of the data available to our society that describes our human advancements is data that proves this is true.

Thus, while we agree that no one knows what the human organism is really capable of, we can safely say that we are always capable of MORE than what we are currently capable of. There is always room for improvement, even in the human system design.

I maintain that the human mind has been saddled with linear thinking since the dawn of our ability to record our history. The achievements of information processing and realtime, closed-loop control systems that have been secured over the last 50-100 years have formed the foundation of our next great leap. And this leap, by the very nature of us achieving the maximum potential of our LINEAR selves, must cross the barrier from LINEAR to NON-LINEAR human system operation.

Get ready for Human OS 2.0

Our first non-linear operating system capable of achieving MUCH more than our predecessors (older system builds).

RMT
 
Re: Human Being: SomeOne Else\'s System Design

RMT, why do you always use such highly technical terms and descriptions to basically say that we need to know God? :D

Your friend,

iridium
 
Re: Human Being: SomeOne Else\'s System Design

Hi iridum,
why do you always use such highly technical terms and descriptions to basically say that we need to know God?
Click to expand...
Newsflash... not everyone believes in God, and as such they require scientific reasoning and evidence that describe the same effect (Creation).


On a similar theme... My chiropracter and myself are considering a partnership to combine her knowledge of physiology and my systems engineering capabilities to develop a functional model of the human organism (i.e. a more integrated one than is currently "out there"). While researching I found the following:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/e28172g355005h32/

Three layer functional model and energy exchange concept of aging process

(RMT notes: Hmmmmm... THREE layer. I'm liking it already!)


Abstract: Relying on a certain degree of abstraction, we can propose that no particular distinction exists between animate or living matter and inanimate matter. While focusing attention on some specifics, the dividing line between the two can be drawn. The most apparent distinction is in the level of structural and functional organization with the dissimilar streams of ‘energy flow’ between the observed entity and the surrounding environment. In essence, living matter is created from inanimate matter which is organized to contain internal intense energy processes and maintain lower intensity energy exchange processes with the environment. Taking internal and external energy processes into account, we contend in this paper that living matter can be referred to as matter of dissipative structure, with this structure assumed to be a common quality of all living creatures and living matter in general . Interruption of internal energy conversion processes and terminating the controlled energy exchange with the environment leads to degeneration of dissipative structure and reduction of the same to inanimate matter, (gas, liquid and/or solid inanimate substances), and ultimately what can be called ‘death.’ This concept of what we call dissipative nature can be extended from living organisms to social groups of animals, to mankind. An analogy based on the organization of matter provides a basis for a functional model of living entities. The models relies on the parallels among the three central structures of any cell (nucleus, cytoplasm and outer membrane) and the human body (central organs, body fluids along with the connective tissues, and external skin integument). This three-part structural organization may be observed almost universally in nature. It can be observed from the atomic structure to the planetary and intergalactic organizations. This similarity is corroborated by the membrane theory applied to living organisms. According to the energy nature of living matter and the proposed functional model, the decreased integrity of a human body's external envelope membrane is a first cause of the structural degradation and aging of the entire organism. The aging process than progresses externally to internally, as in single cell organisms, suggesting that much of the efforts towards the restoration and maintenance of the mechanisms responsible for structural development should be focused accordingly, on the membrane, i.e., the skin. Numerous reports indicate that all parts of the human body, like: bones, blood with blood vessels, muscles, skin, and so on, have some ability for restoration. Therefore, actual revival of not only aging tissue of the human body's membrane, but the entire human body enclosed within, with all internal organs, might be expected. We assess several aging theories within the context of our model and provide suggestions on how to activate the body's own anti-aging mechanisms and increase longevity. This paper presents some analogies and some distinctions that exist between the living dissipative structure matter and inanimate matter, discusses the aging process and proposes certain aging reversal solutions.
Click to expand...

Describing the nature of a living system as an orthonormal set of THREE elements.... HUH! Who would've thunk it possible? /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif
RMT
 
Back
Top