Homeland Security Creating 'SS' Type Unit - RDF

TheCigSmokingMan

TheCigSmokingMan

Rift Surfer
Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1089882806156912.xml
Hudson County Prosecutor Edward DeFazio said his office - at the behest of the federal Department of Homeland Security - is creating a Rapid Deployment Force that will be trained to respond, within the county, to any threats.
Hudson is recruiting special security force for convention, beyond

Hudson County Prosecutor Edward DeFazio said his office - at the behest of the federal Department of Homeland Security - is creating a Rapid Deployment Force that will be trained to respond, within the county, to any threats.
"And that could include anything from possible terrorist activity to any sort of natural disaster or civil disturbance," DeFazio said.

DeFazio said each police department is being asked to assign 5 percent of its force to the new unit.

"Right now, we're looking for volunteers," he said. "We're asking people to make a three-year commitment to the unit. People who do sign up will be screened to see if they're physically up to it."

When the unit is formed and ready to operate, its members will wear distinctive uniforms identifying them as the Rapid Deployment Force, DeFazio said.
 
Re: Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

Thanks for the warning. However, given that terrorists are like deadly viruses, hidden within our midst ready to strike at a moment's notice, I wonder how you would go about preparing for the eventuality of such strikes? If you would not adopt this "special forces" tactic, then what would you do? Or is your role only that of Chicken Little?
 
Re: Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

Azkaban,

As for...

"However, given that terrorists are like deadly viruses, hidden within our midst ready to strike at a moment's notice, I wonder how you would go about preparing for the eventuality of such strikes?"

So? If we know they are here? How come we do not arrest them? So? WE are waiting to catch them in the act? lol?

AS BEFORE 9/11, 11 different nations told of us of the upcoming attack and we did nothing... One nation even sent a group to video tape the attack!!! - ISRAEL

"If you would not adopt this "special forces" tactic, then what would you do? Or is your role only that of Chicken Little?"

The DHS RDF force is for emergencies and CIVIL DISTRUBANCES... NOT TERRORISTS they are here to STOP any CIVILIAN UPRISINGS....

Learn to read and know what you are talking about before you shoot your mouth off and act like a big shot...lol

WAKE UP! AND SMELL THE DICTATORSHIP and ONGOING COUP! /ttiforum/images/graemlins/smile.gif


TheCigMan
 
Re: Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

"Learn to read and know what you are talking about before you shoot your mouth off and act like a big shot"

Does your cigarette smoking result in you being overly sensitive? Why so angry? I only asked a question. And by the way, you did not answer either of them. Assume we do not know who the terrorists are, so arresting them before they strike would not be possible. Thank you.

"creating a Rapid Deployment Force that will be trained to respond, within the county, to any threats. "And that could include anything from possible terrorist activity to any sort of natural disaster or civil disturbance," DeFazio said. "

From your own post, it would seem this is for more than just civil disturbances. It says right here it is for possible terrorist activity.
 
Re: Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

They are not more Civil Distrubances... They are not investigators... They are for crowd control...

Read between the lines...

Physical Fit?... Civil Distrubances?... Distinct Uniforms?... 3 Year Commitment?

As for your rhetorical statements... leave personal attacks to private messages if do not agree with the poster so people do not have to listen to your dribble.
 
Re: Homeland Security Creating \'SS\' Type Unit - RDF

"As for your rhetorical statements... leave personal attacks to private messages if do not agree with the poster so people do not have to listen to your dribble."

They were not rhetorical questions. I would really like to know your answers. I am not attacking you, I am asking you questions. Thank you.
 
Back
Top