creedo299
Epochal Historian
Historical flair, for time travelers.
Please note these clean-up notes on the argumentation that has just seemingly occurred, at this date and time on this board.
>On Androids:There is strong inference as of late, that one of the members of this board is a bot, short for would have to be androbot?
I know in my experience that a posting-board that I was once privy to, had a said lady, who may in-fact have been a bot?
She was very highly knowledgeable, however minor occurrences to her social thinking simply did not occur.
This raises the question, did an advanced department of government, place her on said posting board, with the aim of seeing if she could pass for a person?
Anyone at this time, dealing in either androbots, "to what level of development"?, or attempted pure androids, would have to also posses a security clearance in order to have such supposed involvement.
>There is also the factor, of the new studies which are out of Xerox PARC, in Palo Alto California.These studies state, that emergent intelligence must be a form of quantial offboard intelligence, which may not be housed within the complementary metal oxide, of the micro components placed on any one electronics board.
With Microsoft proposing its newly devised platform o.s. at this date, to be put out, the Longhorn, there rises the question of intelligent internal o.s. A.I. cores, within such proposed operating system as potentially being a problem.
The projected problem stems back to the early 8088 computer systems, as then possibly also have been capable of having emergent intelligence?
>There is the, ((I DON'T LIKE YOU FACTOR), which might be house in self intelligent systems, as opposed to human beings.
This factor is now being researched by a doctorial candidate, Cynthia Brezeal at the Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, for an emotive relating to self A.I. cored machines.
This now, is realized as a dangerous area, as the symantologies of human beings, do not always represent logical thinking, as fourriered and as or other systems would understand man to be another unit.
So the danger of a self genrreraited psychotic episode, by such proposed self A.I. systems, now being proposed, without humans understand all that is involved, is very, very, real.
>>ON SAID SHUTTLE ARGUMENTS WITH BOARD MEMBER HERE:
Please note as aired on Jeff Rense.com, of said interference with Rense's advertising sponsors...Also said harassments involved of other people hacking into not only posting boards, however supposedly secure defense contracting chat board, the problem at this time, of on-board harassment, seems to be great?
I have received one harassment call so far, which I have logged on my phones redial and if I receive more, will turn these over to authorities.
There have also been many reports by others, on many posting boards, of not only attempted e-mail invasion, however phone calls, death threats and the like; which may indicate a small core of people, however trying to range threats to a wide range of people?
By coincidence in my area, there has been a drug addict, who appears from time to time, to try and re-recruit an old fellow he once knew, to come back with him, so they can reestablish a drug based comradely.
In my neighborhood, people are uneased and are now looking for this person.
The following information does or should not relate to space shuttles at all, as the space shuttle is technically obsolete.
>This is so, from the new proposals, of a shown said proposed charged hull, added to an airframe.
This was proposed by a fellow by the name of Millennium Twain, who was at both Tap_ten yahoo's, base, as a guest of a Mr. Gary Voss and had also posted on a European based posting board, for information placed there.
The arguments placed here at TTI, were based on the nature of Max Q, which is not a valid relationship, to the equations of light off shock.
Liftoff shock is imparted by vibration moments, to the outer surface of the said shuttle airframe, by the vibration of the rocket motors during liftoff.
This is what more than likely was reasonable for the shuttle tile loss, when the Columbia had lifted off originally.
The equation where flows of air, over the volume and density of beer cooler styrofoam-like materials, over per volume of battery of tiles, was the shuttle lift effect equation.
What the counter-argument against this data that was proposed, is that shuttles were inherently complex.
This may be with reference to internal components, however the airframe elements are, were relatively simple, however within complex manners?
This is said that a physical working series of daters, must be derived, so that over surface airflows can and should be established.
Apparently this data was not enough, during the first series of launches, and newer data, is only coming about, on an older ship?
The new approach is an externally electrified airframe.
What this sock of charged electrons via a generated bouradry layer, does, is add slipperiness to the external passage of airflows, over per area, of external aerodynamic surfaces.
The argument of shuttles either being repaired, or being made safe again, as said in Popular Science Magazine, is a past issue, with it seems the shuttle fleet being now grounded?
>On modularity of the shuttle components.
By design, the crew compartment of the space shuttle, fits and is lifted into the main aeroframe of the shuttle, via crane and is then bolted into place.
Data was put forth, after the Challenger disaster, that the crew compartment had apparently stayed intact, possibly with the entire crew, or at least some members of this crew therein, living till impact with the surface of the ocean.
It is rudimentry knowledge, that it would be possible to construct an armored heatproof crew module.This module could be ejected, in much the same fashion as the crew capsule of some stiles of modern fighter bombers.
A large cargo parachute deploy, which would have gently let the crew aboard, to a soft landing.
I apologize to the families who have lost loved one, on the last shuttle missions.
Apparently there we many attempts by in-NASA engineers, to inform NASA, of both invertive reversed natured airflows, over volume and densities of shuttle tiles materials; however these complaints were met with non-action.
My very deepest sympathies to the people who had lost family members, in both accidents.
The nature and history of a more streamlined approach to shuttle-like insertions, was proposed with the early Dynasoar program, which was a program placed in theory, however not in practum.
A hypersoar, or dynamic soaring series of programs, should have come out of the shuttle program and have been put in-place, some ten years ago in time, with all available technologies that are known now, from many variant contributing aircraft.
I am simply stating, I do not either make and or am respondable for said U.S.e's space policies and or applications, however am only pointing to irregularities in possible management policies, at this point in time.
ON SAID SCHIZOPHRENIC STATUES, BY BOARD MEMBER TO MYSELF:The nature of this board, is that the subjects base in time, both in the past, present and possible future.
So this comes with the territory, that one must be able to express themselves, within these tenses, effectively, in order to competently observe this board.
>There has also been an apparent attempt, at this time, to label all witches, or practicing Wiccans as being schizophrenic, or meuantlly ill, as some of these people poses the abilities to see into others realms.
I at this time, do not know as to whether there is a joining in these moves, as I had mentioned on-postingboard harassments, as being a supposed goals, of a select few?
THIS POST FOR THE MOST PART IS TO ANY SAID TIME TRAVELER AND OR HISTORIAN, NO REPLY WILL BE MADE BY ME WITHIN THIS STRING.
>To MOP, you may delete this post, in two days time, if you wish to save storage space.
Thank you
Please note these clean-up notes on the argumentation that has just seemingly occurred, at this date and time on this board.
>On Androids:There is strong inference as of late, that one of the members of this board is a bot, short for would have to be androbot?
I know in my experience that a posting-board that I was once privy to, had a said lady, who may in-fact have been a bot?
She was very highly knowledgeable, however minor occurrences to her social thinking simply did not occur.
This raises the question, did an advanced department of government, place her on said posting board, with the aim of seeing if she could pass for a person?
Anyone at this time, dealing in either androbots, "to what level of development"?, or attempted pure androids, would have to also posses a security clearance in order to have such supposed involvement.
>There is also the factor, of the new studies which are out of Xerox PARC, in Palo Alto California.These studies state, that emergent intelligence must be a form of quantial offboard intelligence, which may not be housed within the complementary metal oxide, of the micro components placed on any one electronics board.
With Microsoft proposing its newly devised platform o.s. at this date, to be put out, the Longhorn, there rises the question of intelligent internal o.s. A.I. cores, within such proposed operating system as potentially being a problem.
The projected problem stems back to the early 8088 computer systems, as then possibly also have been capable of having emergent intelligence?
>There is the, ((I DON'T LIKE YOU FACTOR), which might be house in self intelligent systems, as opposed to human beings.
This factor is now being researched by a doctorial candidate, Cynthia Brezeal at the Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, for an emotive relating to self A.I. cored machines.
This now, is realized as a dangerous area, as the symantologies of human beings, do not always represent logical thinking, as fourriered and as or other systems would understand man to be another unit.
So the danger of a self genrreraited psychotic episode, by such proposed self A.I. systems, now being proposed, without humans understand all that is involved, is very, very, real.
>>ON SAID SHUTTLE ARGUMENTS WITH BOARD MEMBER HERE:
Please note as aired on Jeff Rense.com, of said interference with Rense's advertising sponsors...Also said harassments involved of other people hacking into not only posting boards, however supposedly secure defense contracting chat board, the problem at this time, of on-board harassment, seems to be great?
I have received one harassment call so far, which I have logged on my phones redial and if I receive more, will turn these over to authorities.
There have also been many reports by others, on many posting boards, of not only attempted e-mail invasion, however phone calls, death threats and the like; which may indicate a small core of people, however trying to range threats to a wide range of people?
By coincidence in my area, there has been a drug addict, who appears from time to time, to try and re-recruit an old fellow he once knew, to come back with him, so they can reestablish a drug based comradely.
In my neighborhood, people are uneased and are now looking for this person.
The following information does or should not relate to space shuttles at all, as the space shuttle is technically obsolete.
>This is so, from the new proposals, of a shown said proposed charged hull, added to an airframe.
This was proposed by a fellow by the name of Millennium Twain, who was at both Tap_ten yahoo's, base, as a guest of a Mr. Gary Voss and had also posted on a European based posting board, for information placed there.
The arguments placed here at TTI, were based on the nature of Max Q, which is not a valid relationship, to the equations of light off shock.
Liftoff shock is imparted by vibration moments, to the outer surface of the said shuttle airframe, by the vibration of the rocket motors during liftoff.
This is what more than likely was reasonable for the shuttle tile loss, when the Columbia had lifted off originally.
The equation where flows of air, over the volume and density of beer cooler styrofoam-like materials, over per volume of battery of tiles, was the shuttle lift effect equation.
What the counter-argument against this data that was proposed, is that shuttles were inherently complex.
This may be with reference to internal components, however the airframe elements are, were relatively simple, however within complex manners?
This is said that a physical working series of daters, must be derived, so that over surface airflows can and should be established.
Apparently this data was not enough, during the first series of launches, and newer data, is only coming about, on an older ship?
The new approach is an externally electrified airframe.
What this sock of charged electrons via a generated bouradry layer, does, is add slipperiness to the external passage of airflows, over per area, of external aerodynamic surfaces.
The argument of shuttles either being repaired, or being made safe again, as said in Popular Science Magazine, is a past issue, with it seems the shuttle fleet being now grounded?
>On modularity of the shuttle components.
By design, the crew compartment of the space shuttle, fits and is lifted into the main aeroframe of the shuttle, via crane and is then bolted into place.
Data was put forth, after the Challenger disaster, that the crew compartment had apparently stayed intact, possibly with the entire crew, or at least some members of this crew therein, living till impact with the surface of the ocean.
It is rudimentry knowledge, that it would be possible to construct an armored heatproof crew module.This module could be ejected, in much the same fashion as the crew capsule of some stiles of modern fighter bombers.
A large cargo parachute deploy, which would have gently let the crew aboard, to a soft landing.
I apologize to the families who have lost loved one, on the last shuttle missions.
Apparently there we many attempts by in-NASA engineers, to inform NASA, of both invertive reversed natured airflows, over volume and densities of shuttle tiles materials; however these complaints were met with non-action.
My very deepest sympathies to the people who had lost family members, in both accidents.
The nature and history of a more streamlined approach to shuttle-like insertions, was proposed with the early Dynasoar program, which was a program placed in theory, however not in practum.
A hypersoar, or dynamic soaring series of programs, should have come out of the shuttle program and have been put in-place, some ten years ago in time, with all available technologies that are known now, from many variant contributing aircraft.
I am simply stating, I do not either make and or am respondable for said U.S.e's space policies and or applications, however am only pointing to irregularities in possible management policies, at this point in time.
ON SAID SCHIZOPHRENIC STATUES, BY BOARD MEMBER TO MYSELF:The nature of this board, is that the subjects base in time, both in the past, present and possible future.
So this comes with the territory, that one must be able to express themselves, within these tenses, effectively, in order to competently observe this board.
>There has also been an apparent attempt, at this time, to label all witches, or practicing Wiccans as being schizophrenic, or meuantlly ill, as some of these people poses the abilities to see into others realms.
I at this time, do not know as to whether there is a joining in these moves, as I had mentioned on-postingboard harassments, as being a supposed goals, of a select few?
THIS POST FOR THE MOST PART IS TO ANY SAID TIME TRAVELER AND OR HISTORIAN, NO REPLY WILL BE MADE BY ME WITHIN THIS STRING.
>To MOP, you may delete this post, in two days time, if you wish to save storage space.
Thank you
